Comparison of four commercial EBV DNA quantitative tests to a new test at an early stage of development

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of four commercial EBV DNA quantitative tests to a new test at an early stage of development

AU - Stelzl, Evelyn

AU - Kessler, Harald H

AU - Parulekar, Amit D

AU - Bier, Carolin

AU - Nörz, Dominik

AU - Schneider, Tanja

AU - Kumar, Suchitra

AU - Simon, Christian O

AU - Lütgehetmann, Marc

N1 - Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

PY - 2023/4

Y1 - 2023/4

N2 - BACKGROUND: Regular screening for Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) DNA using quantitative RT-PCR is recommended for early intervention in at-risk patients. Harmonization of quantitative RT-PCR assays is critical to avoid misinterpretation of results. Here, we compare quantitative results of the cobas® EBV assay to four commercial RT-qPCR assays.METHODS: The cobas EBV, EBV R-Gene, artus EBV RG PCR, RealStar EBV PCR kit 2.0 and Abbott EBV RealTime assays were compared for analytic performance using a 10-fold dilution series of EBV reference material, normalized to the WHO standard. For clinical performance, their quantitative results were compared using anonymized, leftover EBV-DNA-positive EDTA plasma samples.RESULTS: For analytic accuracy, the cobas EBV deviated -0.0097 log10 from target values. The other tests showed deviations between 0.0037 and -0.12 log10. For clinical performance, accuracy and linearity of cobas EBV data from both study sites were excellent. Bland-Altman bias and Deming regression analyses showed statistical correlation for cobas EBV to both EBV R-Gene and Abbott RealTime assays but an offset of cobas EBV to artus EBV RG PCR and RealStar EBV PCR kit 2.0.CONCLUSION: The cobas EBV showed the closest correlation to the reference material, followed closely by EBV R-Gene and Abbott EBV RealTime. Values obtained are stated in IU/mL, facilitating comparison across testing sites and potentially improving utilization of guidelines for diagnosis, monitoring, and treatment of patients.

AB - BACKGROUND: Regular screening for Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) DNA using quantitative RT-PCR is recommended for early intervention in at-risk patients. Harmonization of quantitative RT-PCR assays is critical to avoid misinterpretation of results. Here, we compare quantitative results of the cobas® EBV assay to four commercial RT-qPCR assays.METHODS: The cobas EBV, EBV R-Gene, artus EBV RG PCR, RealStar EBV PCR kit 2.0 and Abbott EBV RealTime assays were compared for analytic performance using a 10-fold dilution series of EBV reference material, normalized to the WHO standard. For clinical performance, their quantitative results were compared using anonymized, leftover EBV-DNA-positive EDTA plasma samples.RESULTS: For analytic accuracy, the cobas EBV deviated -0.0097 log10 from target values. The other tests showed deviations between 0.0037 and -0.12 log10. For clinical performance, accuracy and linearity of cobas EBV data from both study sites were excellent. Bland-Altman bias and Deming regression analyses showed statistical correlation for cobas EBV to both EBV R-Gene and Abbott RealTime assays but an offset of cobas EBV to artus EBV RG PCR and RealStar EBV PCR kit 2.0.CONCLUSION: The cobas EBV showed the closest correlation to the reference material, followed closely by EBV R-Gene and Abbott EBV RealTime. Values obtained are stated in IU/mL, facilitating comparison across testing sites and potentially improving utilization of guidelines for diagnosis, monitoring, and treatment of patients.

U2 - 10.1016/j.jcv.2023.105400

DO - 10.1016/j.jcv.2023.105400

M3 - SCORING: Journal article

C2 - 36796282

VL - 161

JO - J CLIN VIROL

JF - J CLIN VIROL

SN - 1386-6532

M1 - 105400

ER -