Comparison of cytogenetic clonal evolution patterns following allogeneic hematopoietic transplantation versus conventional treatment in patients at relapse of AML.
Standard
Comparison of cytogenetic clonal evolution patterns following allogeneic hematopoietic transplantation versus conventional treatment in patients at relapse of AML. / Bacher, Ulrike; Haferlach, Torsten; Alpermann, Tamara; Zenger, Melanie; Kröger, Nicolaus; Beelen, Dietrich W; Kern, Wolfgang; Schnittger, Susanne; Haferlach, Claudia.
In: BIOL BLOOD MARROW TR, Vol. 16, No. 12, 12, 2010, p. 1649-1657.Research output: SCORING: Contribution to journal › SCORING: Journal article › Research › peer-review
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Comparison of cytogenetic clonal evolution patterns following allogeneic hematopoietic transplantation versus conventional treatment in patients at relapse of AML.
AU - Bacher, Ulrike
AU - Haferlach, Torsten
AU - Alpermann, Tamara
AU - Zenger, Melanie
AU - Kröger, Nicolaus
AU - Beelen, Dietrich W
AU - Kern, Wolfgang
AU - Schnittger, Susanne
AU - Haferlach, Claudia
PY - 2010
Y1 - 2010
N2 - Relapse of acute myelogenous leukemia has been associated with clonal cytogenetic evolution, but no study focused specifically on relapse after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). We compared karyotypes in 160 patients at both diagnosis and relapse either after allo-HSCT (n = 26) or standard chemotherapy (n = 134) using chromosome banding analysis combined with fluorescein in situ hybridization. There were 71 females and 89 males (19.7-80.6 years). At diagnosis, aberrant karyotypes were more frequent in the HSCT than in the chemotherapy cohort (16 of 26; 61.5% versus 63 of 134; 47.0%). This was most obvious in patients with unfavorable cytogenetics (8 of 26; 30.8% versus 19 of 134; 14.2%; P = .032). Differences in the karyotypes between diagnosis and relapse were more frequent in the allo-cohort (14 of 26; 53.8% versus 49 of 134; 36.6%) than in the conventional cohort (n.s.), mainly because of newly emerging cytogenetic alterations. Appearance of 3 new clonal alterations was more frequent in the allo-cohort (6 of 12; 50.0% with clonal evolution versus 5 of 41; 12.2%, P = .005). The mean number of cytogenetic alterations per patient was increasing from 2.0 at diagnosis to 4.0 at relapse in the allo-cohort, in the conventionally treated patients from 0.9 to 1.3 (both P <.001). Thus, higher frequencies of clonal evolution and increasing cytogenetic complexity were observed in the stem cell recipients probably related to the more unfavorable cytogenetic profiles already depicted at diagnosis.
AB - Relapse of acute myelogenous leukemia has been associated with clonal cytogenetic evolution, but no study focused specifically on relapse after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). We compared karyotypes in 160 patients at both diagnosis and relapse either after allo-HSCT (n = 26) or standard chemotherapy (n = 134) using chromosome banding analysis combined with fluorescein in situ hybridization. There were 71 females and 89 males (19.7-80.6 years). At diagnosis, aberrant karyotypes were more frequent in the HSCT than in the chemotherapy cohort (16 of 26; 61.5% versus 63 of 134; 47.0%). This was most obvious in patients with unfavorable cytogenetics (8 of 26; 30.8% versus 19 of 134; 14.2%; P = .032). Differences in the karyotypes between diagnosis and relapse were more frequent in the allo-cohort (14 of 26; 53.8% versus 49 of 134; 36.6%) than in the conventional cohort (n.s.), mainly because of newly emerging cytogenetic alterations. Appearance of 3 new clonal alterations was more frequent in the allo-cohort (6 of 12; 50.0% with clonal evolution versus 5 of 41; 12.2%, P = .005). The mean number of cytogenetic alterations per patient was increasing from 2.0 at diagnosis to 4.0 at relapse in the allo-cohort, in the conventionally treated patients from 0.9 to 1.3 (both P <.001). Thus, higher frequencies of clonal evolution and increasing cytogenetic complexity were observed in the stem cell recipients probably related to the more unfavorable cytogenetic profiles already depicted at diagnosis.
M3 - SCORING: Zeitschriftenaufsatz
VL - 16
SP - 1649
EP - 1657
JO - BIOL BLOOD MARROW TR
JF - BIOL BLOOD MARROW TR
SN - 1083-8791
IS - 12
M1 - 12
ER -