Comparing the Patient Health Questionnaire - 15 and the Somatic Symptom Scale - 8 as measures of somatic symptom burden

Standard

Comparing the Patient Health Questionnaire - 15 and the Somatic Symptom Scale - 8 as measures of somatic symptom burden. / Toussaint, Anne; Kroenke, Kurt; Baye, Fitsum; Lourens, Spencer.

In: J PSYCHOSOM RES, Vol. 101, 10.2017, p. 44-50.

Research output: SCORING: Contribution to journalSCORING: Journal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{16a28ddb3d2043b69821b512b3c3e42c,
title = "Comparing the Patient Health Questionnaire - 15 and the Somatic Symptom Scale - 8 as measures of somatic symptom burden",
abstract = "PURPOSE: The Patient Health Questionnaire - 15 (PHQ-15) and the Somatic Symptom Scale - 8 (SSS-8) are self-report measures which assess somatic symptom burden. The present study investigates whether the two measures are comparable in terms of their psychometric properties and estimates of symptom burden.METHOD: Item characteristics, reliability, symptom severity and construct validity with regard to other relevant psychological, health-related quality of life and disability measures were compared for the PHQ-15m and the SSS-8 in 294 primary care patients who participated in a randomized comparative effectiveness trial targeting pain and mood symptoms.RESULTS: The reliabilities of the PHQ-15m and the SSS-8 were α=0.66 and α=0.72, respectively. Both measures were highly correlated (r=0.79). All item characteristics were comparable and both instruments showed the same pattern of correlations with instruments measuring depression, anxiety, pain, quality of life and impairment (r=0.25 to 0.53). A 1-point score increase (worsening of somatic symptoms) on either instrument resulted in a 3.7% to 3.9% increase in the number of disability days reported for the last four weeks. Using the same severity thresholds (5: low, 10: medium, 15: high), both measures identified nearly identical subgroups of patients with regard to health-related quality of life and disability.CONCLUSION: The PHQ-15m and the SSS-8 are comparable measures in terms of reliability and validity and severity classifications. These findings are in line with previous results and support the use of the SSS-8 as a valuable and short alternative to the original PHQ-15 in settings with limited assessment time.",
keywords = "Journal Article",
author = "Anne Toussaint and Kurt Kroenke and Fitsum Baye and Spencer Lourens",
note = "Copyright {\textcopyright} 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.",
year = "2017",
month = oct,
doi = "10.1016/j.jpsychores.2017.08.002",
language = "English",
volume = "101",
pages = "44--50",
journal = "J PSYCHOSOM RES",
issn = "0022-3999",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparing the Patient Health Questionnaire - 15 and the Somatic Symptom Scale - 8 as measures of somatic symptom burden

AU - Toussaint, Anne

AU - Kroenke, Kurt

AU - Baye, Fitsum

AU - Lourens, Spencer

N1 - Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

PY - 2017/10

Y1 - 2017/10

N2 - PURPOSE: The Patient Health Questionnaire - 15 (PHQ-15) and the Somatic Symptom Scale - 8 (SSS-8) are self-report measures which assess somatic symptom burden. The present study investigates whether the two measures are comparable in terms of their psychometric properties and estimates of symptom burden.METHOD: Item characteristics, reliability, symptom severity and construct validity with regard to other relevant psychological, health-related quality of life and disability measures were compared for the PHQ-15m and the SSS-8 in 294 primary care patients who participated in a randomized comparative effectiveness trial targeting pain and mood symptoms.RESULTS: The reliabilities of the PHQ-15m and the SSS-8 were α=0.66 and α=0.72, respectively. Both measures were highly correlated (r=0.79). All item characteristics were comparable and both instruments showed the same pattern of correlations with instruments measuring depression, anxiety, pain, quality of life and impairment (r=0.25 to 0.53). A 1-point score increase (worsening of somatic symptoms) on either instrument resulted in a 3.7% to 3.9% increase in the number of disability days reported for the last four weeks. Using the same severity thresholds (5: low, 10: medium, 15: high), both measures identified nearly identical subgroups of patients with regard to health-related quality of life and disability.CONCLUSION: The PHQ-15m and the SSS-8 are comparable measures in terms of reliability and validity and severity classifications. These findings are in line with previous results and support the use of the SSS-8 as a valuable and short alternative to the original PHQ-15 in settings with limited assessment time.

AB - PURPOSE: The Patient Health Questionnaire - 15 (PHQ-15) and the Somatic Symptom Scale - 8 (SSS-8) are self-report measures which assess somatic symptom burden. The present study investigates whether the two measures are comparable in terms of their psychometric properties and estimates of symptom burden.METHOD: Item characteristics, reliability, symptom severity and construct validity with regard to other relevant psychological, health-related quality of life and disability measures were compared for the PHQ-15m and the SSS-8 in 294 primary care patients who participated in a randomized comparative effectiveness trial targeting pain and mood symptoms.RESULTS: The reliabilities of the PHQ-15m and the SSS-8 were α=0.66 and α=0.72, respectively. Both measures were highly correlated (r=0.79). All item characteristics were comparable and both instruments showed the same pattern of correlations with instruments measuring depression, anxiety, pain, quality of life and impairment (r=0.25 to 0.53). A 1-point score increase (worsening of somatic symptoms) on either instrument resulted in a 3.7% to 3.9% increase in the number of disability days reported for the last four weeks. Using the same severity thresholds (5: low, 10: medium, 15: high), both measures identified nearly identical subgroups of patients with regard to health-related quality of life and disability.CONCLUSION: The PHQ-15m and the SSS-8 are comparable measures in terms of reliability and validity and severity classifications. These findings are in line with previous results and support the use of the SSS-8 as a valuable and short alternative to the original PHQ-15 in settings with limited assessment time.

KW - Journal Article

U2 - 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2017.08.002

DO - 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2017.08.002

M3 - SCORING: Journal article

C2 - 28867423

VL - 101

SP - 44

EP - 50

JO - J PSYCHOSOM RES

JF - J PSYCHOSOM RES

SN - 0022-3999

ER -