Comparability of anterior chamber depth measurements with partial coherence interferometry and optical low-coherence reflectometry in pseudophakic eyes

Standard

Comparability of anterior chamber depth measurements with partial coherence interferometry and optical low-coherence reflectometry in pseudophakic eyes. / Luft, Nikolaus; Hirnschall, Nino; Farrokhi, Sanaz; Findl, Oliver.

In: J CATARACT REFR SURG, Vol. 41, No. 8, 08.2015, p. 1678-84.

Research output: SCORING: Contribution to journalSCORING: Journal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{3f1e3dccc5b9402d8f15a858983e26b8,
title = "Comparability of anterior chamber depth measurements with partial coherence interferometry and optical low-coherence reflectometry in pseudophakic eyes",
abstract = "PURPOSE: To assess whether anterior chamber depth (ACD) measurements in pseudophakic eyes obtained with partial coherence interferometry (PCI) and optical low-coherence reflectometry (OLCR) devices can be used interchangeably.SETTING: Vienna Institute for Research in Ocular Surgery, A Karl Landsteiner Institute, Hanusch Hospital, Vienna, Austria.DESIGN: Prospective case series.METHODS: The ACD measurements in 1 eye of each pseudophakic patient were performed with the PCI-based ACMaster device and the OLCR-based Lenstar LS900 device at least 1 day postoperatively.RESULTS: The study comprised 65 eyes of 65 patients with a mean age of 71.7 years ± 9.0 (SD) (range 39 to 91 years). In 15 eyes, no valid ACD readings could be obtained with the OLCR device. No obvious reason for these measurement failures was identified; however, tear-film alterations shortly after surgery were suspected. No significant difference in the mean ACD in the remaining 50 eyes was found between PCI measurements (5019 ± 660 μm; range 4008 to 6181 μm) and OLCR measurements (5015 ± 663 μm; range 4017 to 6163 μm) (P = .06). Three (6%) of 50 measurements were not within the 95% limits of agreement in the Bland-Altman analysis.CONCLUSIONS: Pseudophakic ACD measurements with the PCI and OLCR devices can be used interchangeably. The OLCR device proved to be more user-friendly and faster; however, in a substantial number of eyes, no usable values were obtainable.FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE: No author has a financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned.",
keywords = "Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Anterior Chamber, Biometry, Diagnostic Techniques, Ophthalmological, Female, Humans, Interferometry, Lens Implantation, Intraocular, Light, Male, Middle Aged, Organ Size, Phacoemulsification, Prospective Studies, Pseudophakia, Comparative Study, Journal Article",
author = "Nikolaus Luft and Nino Hirnschall and Sanaz Farrokhi and Oliver Findl",
note = "Copyright {\textcopyright} 2015 ASCRS and ESCRS. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.",
year = "2015",
month = aug,
doi = "10.1016/j.jcrs.2015.08.013",
language = "English",
volume = "41",
pages = "1678--84",
journal = "J CATARACT REFR SURG",
issn = "0886-3350",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "8",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparability of anterior chamber depth measurements with partial coherence interferometry and optical low-coherence reflectometry in pseudophakic eyes

AU - Luft, Nikolaus

AU - Hirnschall, Nino

AU - Farrokhi, Sanaz

AU - Findl, Oliver

N1 - Copyright © 2015 ASCRS and ESCRS. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

PY - 2015/8

Y1 - 2015/8

N2 - PURPOSE: To assess whether anterior chamber depth (ACD) measurements in pseudophakic eyes obtained with partial coherence interferometry (PCI) and optical low-coherence reflectometry (OLCR) devices can be used interchangeably.SETTING: Vienna Institute for Research in Ocular Surgery, A Karl Landsteiner Institute, Hanusch Hospital, Vienna, Austria.DESIGN: Prospective case series.METHODS: The ACD measurements in 1 eye of each pseudophakic patient were performed with the PCI-based ACMaster device and the OLCR-based Lenstar LS900 device at least 1 day postoperatively.RESULTS: The study comprised 65 eyes of 65 patients with a mean age of 71.7 years ± 9.0 (SD) (range 39 to 91 years). In 15 eyes, no valid ACD readings could be obtained with the OLCR device. No obvious reason for these measurement failures was identified; however, tear-film alterations shortly after surgery were suspected. No significant difference in the mean ACD in the remaining 50 eyes was found between PCI measurements (5019 ± 660 μm; range 4008 to 6181 μm) and OLCR measurements (5015 ± 663 μm; range 4017 to 6163 μm) (P = .06). Three (6%) of 50 measurements were not within the 95% limits of agreement in the Bland-Altman analysis.CONCLUSIONS: Pseudophakic ACD measurements with the PCI and OLCR devices can be used interchangeably. The OLCR device proved to be more user-friendly and faster; however, in a substantial number of eyes, no usable values were obtainable.FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE: No author has a financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned.

AB - PURPOSE: To assess whether anterior chamber depth (ACD) measurements in pseudophakic eyes obtained with partial coherence interferometry (PCI) and optical low-coherence reflectometry (OLCR) devices can be used interchangeably.SETTING: Vienna Institute for Research in Ocular Surgery, A Karl Landsteiner Institute, Hanusch Hospital, Vienna, Austria.DESIGN: Prospective case series.METHODS: The ACD measurements in 1 eye of each pseudophakic patient were performed with the PCI-based ACMaster device and the OLCR-based Lenstar LS900 device at least 1 day postoperatively.RESULTS: The study comprised 65 eyes of 65 patients with a mean age of 71.7 years ± 9.0 (SD) (range 39 to 91 years). In 15 eyes, no valid ACD readings could be obtained with the OLCR device. No obvious reason for these measurement failures was identified; however, tear-film alterations shortly after surgery were suspected. No significant difference in the mean ACD in the remaining 50 eyes was found between PCI measurements (5019 ± 660 μm; range 4008 to 6181 μm) and OLCR measurements (5015 ± 663 μm; range 4017 to 6163 μm) (P = .06). Three (6%) of 50 measurements were not within the 95% limits of agreement in the Bland-Altman analysis.CONCLUSIONS: Pseudophakic ACD measurements with the PCI and OLCR devices can be used interchangeably. The OLCR device proved to be more user-friendly and faster; however, in a substantial number of eyes, no usable values were obtainable.FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE: No author has a financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned.

KW - Adult

KW - Aged

KW - Aged, 80 and over

KW - Anterior Chamber

KW - Biometry

KW - Diagnostic Techniques, Ophthalmological

KW - Female

KW - Humans

KW - Interferometry

KW - Lens Implantation, Intraocular

KW - Light

KW - Male

KW - Middle Aged

KW - Organ Size

KW - Phacoemulsification

KW - Prospective Studies

KW - Pseudophakia

KW - Comparative Study

KW - Journal Article

U2 - 10.1016/j.jcrs.2015.08.013

DO - 10.1016/j.jcrs.2015.08.013

M3 - SCORING: Journal article

C2 - 26432125

VL - 41

SP - 1678

EP - 1684

JO - J CATARACT REFR SURG

JF - J CATARACT REFR SURG

SN - 0886-3350

IS - 8

ER -