Clopidogrel desensitization after drug-eluting stent placement.

Standard

Clopidogrel desensitization after drug-eluting stent placement. / Tiehl, von; Karl, F; Price, Matthew J; Valencia, Rafael; Ludington, Katherine J; Simon, Ronald; Simon, Ronald A.

In: J AM COLL CARDIOL, Vol. 50, No. 21, 21, 2007, p. 2039-2043.

Research output: SCORING: Contribution to journalSCORING: Journal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Tiehl, V, Karl, F, Price, MJ, Valencia, R, Ludington, KJ, Simon, R & Simon, RA 2007, 'Clopidogrel desensitization after drug-eluting stent placement.', J AM COLL CARDIOL, vol. 50, no. 21, 21, pp. 2039-2043. <http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18021870?dopt=Citation>

APA

Tiehl, V., Karl, F., Price, M. J., Valencia, R., Ludington, K. J., Simon, R., & Simon, R. A. (2007). Clopidogrel desensitization after drug-eluting stent placement. J AM COLL CARDIOL, 50(21), 2039-2043. [21]. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18021870?dopt=Citation

Vancouver

Tiehl V, Karl F, Price MJ, Valencia R, Ludington KJ, Simon R et al. Clopidogrel desensitization after drug-eluting stent placement. J AM COLL CARDIOL. 2007;50(21):2039-2043. 21.

Bibtex

@article{8fedab8d4785418eb883c0aaef6d4130,
title = "Clopidogrel desensitization after drug-eluting stent placement.",
abstract = "OBJECTIVES: We hypothesized that a standardized outpatient clopidogrel desensitization protocol would be safe and effective. BACKGROUND: Adverse reactions to clopidogrel are not uncommon, and affected patients must switch to ticlopidine after drug-eluting stent placement, despite its more malignant side-effect profile, because of the risk of ischemic events associated with premature discontinuation of dual antiplatelet therapy. METHODS: Patients with suspected clopidogrel sensitivity were treated with escalating doses of clopidogrel administered orally in solution until either a clinically significant reaction occurred or the full 75-mg tablet of clopidogrel was tolerated. Desensitization was performed on an outpatient basis except in cases in which the subjects were inpatients at the time of enrollment. Follow-up was performed at 2 to 4 weeks and 6 months after treatment. Successful desensitization was defined as the ability to take clopidogrel 75 mg daily without a mucocutaneous, bronchial, or anaphylactic response. RESULTS: We enrolled 24 consecutive patients with suspected reactions to clopidogrel after DES implantation, 20 of whom were outpatients. During desensitization, allergic-type reactions occurred in 4 patients and angina occurred in 1 patient. Desensitization was acutely successful in all 24 patients, and by 6-month follow-up, 1 patient had persistent but improved pruritus controlled with oral antihistamines and 23 remained asymptomatic, with only 2 patients requiring repeat desensitization. CONCLUSIONS: Clopidogrel desensitization is safe and effective, induces a sustained remission, and could be advantageous in treating outpatients who are at-risk for premature discontinuation of dual antiplatelet therapy.",
author = "von Tiehl and F Karl and Price, {Matthew J} and Rafael Valencia and Ludington, {Katherine J} and Ronald Simon and Simon, {Ronald A}",
year = "2007",
language = "Deutsch",
volume = "50",
pages = "2039--2043",
journal = "J AM COLL CARDIOL",
issn = "0735-1097",
publisher = "Elsevier USA",
number = "21",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Clopidogrel desensitization after drug-eluting stent placement.

AU - Tiehl, von

AU - Karl, F

AU - Price, Matthew J

AU - Valencia, Rafael

AU - Ludington, Katherine J

AU - Simon, Ronald

AU - Simon, Ronald A

PY - 2007

Y1 - 2007

N2 - OBJECTIVES: We hypothesized that a standardized outpatient clopidogrel desensitization protocol would be safe and effective. BACKGROUND: Adverse reactions to clopidogrel are not uncommon, and affected patients must switch to ticlopidine after drug-eluting stent placement, despite its more malignant side-effect profile, because of the risk of ischemic events associated with premature discontinuation of dual antiplatelet therapy. METHODS: Patients with suspected clopidogrel sensitivity were treated with escalating doses of clopidogrel administered orally in solution until either a clinically significant reaction occurred or the full 75-mg tablet of clopidogrel was tolerated. Desensitization was performed on an outpatient basis except in cases in which the subjects were inpatients at the time of enrollment. Follow-up was performed at 2 to 4 weeks and 6 months after treatment. Successful desensitization was defined as the ability to take clopidogrel 75 mg daily without a mucocutaneous, bronchial, or anaphylactic response. RESULTS: We enrolled 24 consecutive patients with suspected reactions to clopidogrel after DES implantation, 20 of whom were outpatients. During desensitization, allergic-type reactions occurred in 4 patients and angina occurred in 1 patient. Desensitization was acutely successful in all 24 patients, and by 6-month follow-up, 1 patient had persistent but improved pruritus controlled with oral antihistamines and 23 remained asymptomatic, with only 2 patients requiring repeat desensitization. CONCLUSIONS: Clopidogrel desensitization is safe and effective, induces a sustained remission, and could be advantageous in treating outpatients who are at-risk for premature discontinuation of dual antiplatelet therapy.

AB - OBJECTIVES: We hypothesized that a standardized outpatient clopidogrel desensitization protocol would be safe and effective. BACKGROUND: Adverse reactions to clopidogrel are not uncommon, and affected patients must switch to ticlopidine after drug-eluting stent placement, despite its more malignant side-effect profile, because of the risk of ischemic events associated with premature discontinuation of dual antiplatelet therapy. METHODS: Patients with suspected clopidogrel sensitivity were treated with escalating doses of clopidogrel administered orally in solution until either a clinically significant reaction occurred or the full 75-mg tablet of clopidogrel was tolerated. Desensitization was performed on an outpatient basis except in cases in which the subjects were inpatients at the time of enrollment. Follow-up was performed at 2 to 4 weeks and 6 months after treatment. Successful desensitization was defined as the ability to take clopidogrel 75 mg daily without a mucocutaneous, bronchial, or anaphylactic response. RESULTS: We enrolled 24 consecutive patients with suspected reactions to clopidogrel after DES implantation, 20 of whom were outpatients. During desensitization, allergic-type reactions occurred in 4 patients and angina occurred in 1 patient. Desensitization was acutely successful in all 24 patients, and by 6-month follow-up, 1 patient had persistent but improved pruritus controlled with oral antihistamines and 23 remained asymptomatic, with only 2 patients requiring repeat desensitization. CONCLUSIONS: Clopidogrel desensitization is safe and effective, induces a sustained remission, and could be advantageous in treating outpatients who are at-risk for premature discontinuation of dual antiplatelet therapy.

M3 - SCORING: Zeitschriftenaufsatz

VL - 50

SP - 2039

EP - 2043

JO - J AM COLL CARDIOL

JF - J AM COLL CARDIOL

SN - 0735-1097

IS - 21

M1 - 21

ER -