Clofarabine increases the eradication of minimal residual disease of primary B-precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia compared to high-dose cytarabine without improvement of outcome. Results from the randomized clinical trial 08-09 of the Cooperative Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Study Group
Standard
Clofarabine increases the eradication of minimal residual disease of primary B-precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia compared to high-dose cytarabine without improvement of outcome. Results from the randomized clinical trial 08-09 of the Cooperative Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Study Group. / Escherich, Gabriele; Zur Stadt, Udo; Borkhardt, Arndt; Dilloo, Dagmar; Faber, Jörg; Feuchtinger, Tobias; Imschweiler, Thomas; Jorch, Norbert; Pekrun, Arnulf; Schmid, Irene; Schramm, Franziska; Spohn, Michael; Zimmermann, Martin; Horstmann, Martin A.
In: HAEMATOLOGICA, Vol. 107, No. 5, 01.05.2022, p. 1026-1033.Research output: SCORING: Contribution to journal › SCORING: Journal article › Research › peer-review
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Clofarabine increases the eradication of minimal residual disease of primary B-precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia compared to high-dose cytarabine without improvement of outcome. Results from the randomized clinical trial 08-09 of the Cooperative Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Study Group
AU - Escherich, Gabriele
AU - Zur Stadt, Udo
AU - Borkhardt, Arndt
AU - Dilloo, Dagmar
AU - Faber, Jörg
AU - Feuchtinger, Tobias
AU - Imschweiler, Thomas
AU - Jorch, Norbert
AU - Pekrun, Arnulf
AU - Schmid, Irene
AU - Schramm, Franziska
AU - Spohn, Michael
AU - Zimmermann, Martin
AU - Horstmann, Martin A
PY - 2022/5/1
Y1 - 2022/5/1
N2 - Novel treatment strategies are needed to improve cure for all children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). To this end, we investigated the therapeutic potential of clofarabine in primary ALL in trial CoALL 08-09 (clinicaltrials gov. identifier: NCT01228331). The primary study objective was the minimal residual disease (MRD)- based comparative assessment of cytotoxic efficacies of clofarabine 5x40 mg/m2 versus high-dose cytarabine (HIDAC) 4x3g/m2, both in combination with PEG-ASP 2,500 IU/m2 as randomized intervention in early consolidation. The secondary objective was an outcome analysis focused on treatment arm dependence and MRD after randomized intervention. In B-cell precursor (BCP)-ALL, eradication of MRD was more profound after clofarabine compared to cytarabine, with 93 versus 79 of 143 randomized patients per arm reaching MRD-negativity (c2 test P=0.03, leftsided P [Fisher's exact test]=0.04). MRD status of BCP-ALL after randomized intervention maintained its prognostic relevance, with a significant impact on event-free survival (EFS) and relapse rate. However, no difference in outcome regarding EFS and overall survival (OS) between randomized courses was observed (5-year EFS: clofarabine 85.7, SE=4.1 vs. HIDAC 84.8, SE=4.7 [P=0.96]; OS: 95.7, SE=1.9 vs. 92.2, SE=3.2 [P=0.59]), independent of covariates or overall risk strata. Severe toxicities between randomized and subsequent treatment elements were also without significant difference. In conclusion, clofarabine/PEG-ASP is effective and safe, but greater cytotoxic efficacy of clofarabine compared to HIDAC did not translate into improved outcomes indicating a lack of surrogacy of post-intervention MRD at the trial level as opposed to the patient level, which hampers a broader implementation of this regimen in the frontline treatment of ALL.
AB - Novel treatment strategies are needed to improve cure for all children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). To this end, we investigated the therapeutic potential of clofarabine in primary ALL in trial CoALL 08-09 (clinicaltrials gov. identifier: NCT01228331). The primary study objective was the minimal residual disease (MRD)- based comparative assessment of cytotoxic efficacies of clofarabine 5x40 mg/m2 versus high-dose cytarabine (HIDAC) 4x3g/m2, both in combination with PEG-ASP 2,500 IU/m2 as randomized intervention in early consolidation. The secondary objective was an outcome analysis focused on treatment arm dependence and MRD after randomized intervention. In B-cell precursor (BCP)-ALL, eradication of MRD was more profound after clofarabine compared to cytarabine, with 93 versus 79 of 143 randomized patients per arm reaching MRD-negativity (c2 test P=0.03, leftsided P [Fisher's exact test]=0.04). MRD status of BCP-ALL after randomized intervention maintained its prognostic relevance, with a significant impact on event-free survival (EFS) and relapse rate. However, no difference in outcome regarding EFS and overall survival (OS) between randomized courses was observed (5-year EFS: clofarabine 85.7, SE=4.1 vs. HIDAC 84.8, SE=4.7 [P=0.96]; OS: 95.7, SE=1.9 vs. 92.2, SE=3.2 [P=0.59]), independent of covariates or overall risk strata. Severe toxicities between randomized and subsequent treatment elements were also without significant difference. In conclusion, clofarabine/PEG-ASP is effective and safe, but greater cytotoxic efficacy of clofarabine compared to HIDAC did not translate into improved outcomes indicating a lack of surrogacy of post-intervention MRD at the trial level as opposed to the patient level, which hampers a broader implementation of this regimen in the frontline treatment of ALL.
KW - Acute Disease
KW - Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use
KW - Child
KW - Clofarabine
KW - Cytarabine/therapeutic use
KW - Disease-Free Survival
KW - Humans
KW - Lymphoma, Non-Hodgkin/drug therapy
KW - Neoplasm, Residual/drug therapy
KW - Precursor Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-Lymphoma/diagnosis
KW - Treatment Outcome
U2 - 10.3324/haematol.2021.279357
DO - 10.3324/haematol.2021.279357
M3 - SCORING: Journal article
C2 - 34348455
VL - 107
SP - 1026
EP - 1033
JO - HAEMATOLOGICA
JF - HAEMATOLOGICA
SN - 0390-6078
IS - 5
ER -