Clinically Relevant Interactions with Anti-Infectives on Intensive Care Units—A Multicenter Delphi Study

  • Joachim Andreas Koeck (Shared first author)
  • Heike Hilgarth (Shared first author)
  • Andreas von Ameln-Mayerhofer
  • Damaris Meyn
  • Ruediger Warlich
  • Andreas Münstedt
  • Dagmar Horn (Shared last author)
  • Christina Koenig (Shared last author)

Related Research units

Abstract

Patients in intensive care units (ICUs) are at high risk of drug-drug interactions (DDIs) due to polypharmacy. Little is known about type and frequency of DDIs within German ICUs. Clinical pharmacists' interventions (PI) recorded in a national database (ADKA-DokuPIK) were filtered for ICU patients. Binary DDIs involving ≥1 anti-infective agent with >1 database entry were selected. A modified two-step Delphi process with a group of senior hospital pharmacists was employed to evaluate selected DDIs for clinical relevance by using a five-point scale and to develop guidance for clinical practice. In total, 16,173 PI were recorded, including 1836 (11%) DDIs in the ICU setting. Of the latter, 41% (756/1836) included ≥1 anti-infective agent, 32% (590/1836) were binary DDIs, and 25% (455/1836) were listed at least twice. This translates into 88 different DDIs, 74% (65/88) of which were rated as being clinically relevant by our expert panel. The majority of DDIs (76% [67/88]) included macrolides, antifungals, or fluoroquinolones. This percentage was even higher in DDIs being rated as clinically relevant by the experts (85% [55/65]). It is noted that an inter-professional discussion and approach is needed in the individual patient management of DDIs. The guidance developed might be a tool for decision support.

Bibliographical data

Original languageEnglish
Article number1330
ISSN2079-6382
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 31.10.2021