Clinical effect of accessory renal artery coverage after endovascular repair of aneurysms in abdominal and thoracoabdominal aorta

Standard

Clinical effect of accessory renal artery coverage after endovascular repair of aneurysms in abdominal and thoracoabdominal aorta. / Spanos, Konstantinos; Nana, Petroula; Brotis, Alexandros G; Kouvelos, George; Behrendt, Christian-Alexander; Tsilimparis, Nikos; Kölbel, Tilo; Matsagkas, Miltiadis; Giannoukas, Athanasios.

In: J VASC SURG, Vol. 74, No. 6, 12.2021, p. 2104-2113.e7.

Research output: SCORING: Contribution to journalSCORING: Review articleResearch

Harvard

Spanos, K, Nana, P, Brotis, AG, Kouvelos, G, Behrendt, C-A, Tsilimparis, N, Kölbel, T, Matsagkas, M & Giannoukas, A 2021, 'Clinical effect of accessory renal artery coverage after endovascular repair of aneurysms in abdominal and thoracoabdominal aorta', J VASC SURG, vol. 74, no. 6, pp. 2104-2113.e7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2021.06.032

APA

Spanos, K., Nana, P., Brotis, A. G., Kouvelos, G., Behrendt, C-A., Tsilimparis, N., Kölbel, T., Matsagkas, M., & Giannoukas, A. (2021). Clinical effect of accessory renal artery coverage after endovascular repair of aneurysms in abdominal and thoracoabdominal aorta. J VASC SURG, 74(6), 2104-2113.e7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2021.06.032

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{e04fe519c0614c2ebdf00a3f2cbcf05e,
title = "Clinical effect of accessory renal artery coverage after endovascular repair of aneurysms in abdominal and thoracoabdominal aorta",
abstract = "BACKGROUND: The aim of our systematic review and meta-analysis was to assess the effect of accessory renal artery (ARA) coverage on renal function in terms of acute kidney injury (AKI), renal infarction, chronic renal failure (CRF), and mortality in patients undergoing standard endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) or endovascular repair of complex aneurysms.METHODS: An electronic search of the English language medical literature from 2000 to September 2020 was conducted using the MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases with the PRISMA (preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses) method for studies reporting on ARA management in patients undergoing endovascular repair of aneurysms in the abdominal and thoracoabdominal aorta. The patients were divided into two groups: group 1, patients with ARA coverage; and group 2, patients without an ARA or without coverage of the ARA. Each group included two arms, one of patients who had undergone standard EVAR and one of patients who had undergone endovascular treatment of a complex aortic aneurysm. The GRADE (grading of recommendations assessment, development, evaluation) approach was used to evaluate the quality of evidence and summary of the findings. The primary outcomes included the incidence of AKI, renal infarction, CRF, and mortality.RESULTS: Ten retrospective, nonrandomized, control studies were included in the systematic review reporting on 1014 patients (302 with a covered ARA vs 712 without an ARA or without ARA coverage). In six studies, the mean diameter of the covered ARA was <4 mm (range, 2.7-3.4 mm). The mean follow-up was 22.74 months (range, 1-42 months). In the standard EVAR subgroup, the risk of AKI (odds ratio [OR], 0.72; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.21-2.51; I2 = 0%] in the early period, and CRF (OR, 4.44; 95% CI, 0.46-42.61; I2 = 87%) and death (OR, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.36-2.31; I2 = 0%) during follow-up were similar between groups 1 and 2. Only the risk of renal infarction was greater in group 1 than in group 2 (OR, 93.3; 95% CI, 1.48-5869; I2 = 92%). In the complex aneurysm repair subgroup, the risk of AKI (OR, 1.85; 95% CI, 0.61-5.64; I2 = 42%) in early period and CRF (OR, 1.64; 95% CI, 0.88-3.07; I2 = not applicable) and death (OR, 3.63; 95% CI, 0.14-96.29; I2 = 56%) during follow-up were similar between groups 1 and 2. Only the risk of renal infarction was greater for group 1 compared with group 2 (OR, 8.58; 95% CI, 4.59-16.04; I2 = 0%).CONCLUSIONS: ARA (<4 mm) coverage in patients undergoing standard EVAR or endovascular repair of complex aneurysms is associated with an increased risk of renal infarction. However, we found no clinical effects of ARA coverage on renal function or mortality in early postoperative and follow-up period. Preservation of an ARA >4 mm should be considered.",
keywords = "Acute Kidney Injury/etiology, Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal/diagnostic imaging, Aortic Aneurysm, Thoracic/diagnostic imaging, Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation/adverse effects, Endovascular Procedures/adverse effects, Humans, Kidney Failure, Chronic/etiology, Renal Artery/abnormalities, Risk Assessment, Risk Factors, Time Factors, Treatment Outcome",
author = "Konstantinos Spanos and Petroula Nana and Brotis, {Alexandros G} and George Kouvelos and Christian-Alexander Behrendt and Nikos Tsilimparis and Tilo K{\"o}lbel and Miltiadis Matsagkas and Athanasios Giannoukas",
note = "Copyright {\textcopyright} 2021 Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.",
year = "2021",
month = dec,
doi = "10.1016/j.jvs.2021.06.032",
language = "English",
volume = "74",
pages = "2104--2113.e7",
journal = "J VASC SURG",
issn = "0741-5214",
publisher = "Mosby Inc.",
number = "6",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Clinical effect of accessory renal artery coverage after endovascular repair of aneurysms in abdominal and thoracoabdominal aorta

AU - Spanos, Konstantinos

AU - Nana, Petroula

AU - Brotis, Alexandros G

AU - Kouvelos, George

AU - Behrendt, Christian-Alexander

AU - Tsilimparis, Nikos

AU - Kölbel, Tilo

AU - Matsagkas, Miltiadis

AU - Giannoukas, Athanasios

N1 - Copyright © 2021 Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

PY - 2021/12

Y1 - 2021/12

N2 - BACKGROUND: The aim of our systematic review and meta-analysis was to assess the effect of accessory renal artery (ARA) coverage on renal function in terms of acute kidney injury (AKI), renal infarction, chronic renal failure (CRF), and mortality in patients undergoing standard endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) or endovascular repair of complex aneurysms.METHODS: An electronic search of the English language medical literature from 2000 to September 2020 was conducted using the MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases with the PRISMA (preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses) method for studies reporting on ARA management in patients undergoing endovascular repair of aneurysms in the abdominal and thoracoabdominal aorta. The patients were divided into two groups: group 1, patients with ARA coverage; and group 2, patients without an ARA or without coverage of the ARA. Each group included two arms, one of patients who had undergone standard EVAR and one of patients who had undergone endovascular treatment of a complex aortic aneurysm. The GRADE (grading of recommendations assessment, development, evaluation) approach was used to evaluate the quality of evidence and summary of the findings. The primary outcomes included the incidence of AKI, renal infarction, CRF, and mortality.RESULTS: Ten retrospective, nonrandomized, control studies were included in the systematic review reporting on 1014 patients (302 with a covered ARA vs 712 without an ARA or without ARA coverage). In six studies, the mean diameter of the covered ARA was <4 mm (range, 2.7-3.4 mm). The mean follow-up was 22.74 months (range, 1-42 months). In the standard EVAR subgroup, the risk of AKI (odds ratio [OR], 0.72; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.21-2.51; I2 = 0%] in the early period, and CRF (OR, 4.44; 95% CI, 0.46-42.61; I2 = 87%) and death (OR, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.36-2.31; I2 = 0%) during follow-up were similar between groups 1 and 2. Only the risk of renal infarction was greater in group 1 than in group 2 (OR, 93.3; 95% CI, 1.48-5869; I2 = 92%). In the complex aneurysm repair subgroup, the risk of AKI (OR, 1.85; 95% CI, 0.61-5.64; I2 = 42%) in early period and CRF (OR, 1.64; 95% CI, 0.88-3.07; I2 = not applicable) and death (OR, 3.63; 95% CI, 0.14-96.29; I2 = 56%) during follow-up were similar between groups 1 and 2. Only the risk of renal infarction was greater for group 1 compared with group 2 (OR, 8.58; 95% CI, 4.59-16.04; I2 = 0%).CONCLUSIONS: ARA (<4 mm) coverage in patients undergoing standard EVAR or endovascular repair of complex aneurysms is associated with an increased risk of renal infarction. However, we found no clinical effects of ARA coverage on renal function or mortality in early postoperative and follow-up period. Preservation of an ARA >4 mm should be considered.

AB - BACKGROUND: The aim of our systematic review and meta-analysis was to assess the effect of accessory renal artery (ARA) coverage on renal function in terms of acute kidney injury (AKI), renal infarction, chronic renal failure (CRF), and mortality in patients undergoing standard endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) or endovascular repair of complex aneurysms.METHODS: An electronic search of the English language medical literature from 2000 to September 2020 was conducted using the MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases with the PRISMA (preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses) method for studies reporting on ARA management in patients undergoing endovascular repair of aneurysms in the abdominal and thoracoabdominal aorta. The patients were divided into two groups: group 1, patients with ARA coverage; and group 2, patients without an ARA or without coverage of the ARA. Each group included two arms, one of patients who had undergone standard EVAR and one of patients who had undergone endovascular treatment of a complex aortic aneurysm. The GRADE (grading of recommendations assessment, development, evaluation) approach was used to evaluate the quality of evidence and summary of the findings. The primary outcomes included the incidence of AKI, renal infarction, CRF, and mortality.RESULTS: Ten retrospective, nonrandomized, control studies were included in the systematic review reporting on 1014 patients (302 with a covered ARA vs 712 without an ARA or without ARA coverage). In six studies, the mean diameter of the covered ARA was <4 mm (range, 2.7-3.4 mm). The mean follow-up was 22.74 months (range, 1-42 months). In the standard EVAR subgroup, the risk of AKI (odds ratio [OR], 0.72; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.21-2.51; I2 = 0%] in the early period, and CRF (OR, 4.44; 95% CI, 0.46-42.61; I2 = 87%) and death (OR, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.36-2.31; I2 = 0%) during follow-up were similar between groups 1 and 2. Only the risk of renal infarction was greater in group 1 than in group 2 (OR, 93.3; 95% CI, 1.48-5869; I2 = 92%). In the complex aneurysm repair subgroup, the risk of AKI (OR, 1.85; 95% CI, 0.61-5.64; I2 = 42%) in early period and CRF (OR, 1.64; 95% CI, 0.88-3.07; I2 = not applicable) and death (OR, 3.63; 95% CI, 0.14-96.29; I2 = 56%) during follow-up were similar between groups 1 and 2. Only the risk of renal infarction was greater for group 1 compared with group 2 (OR, 8.58; 95% CI, 4.59-16.04; I2 = 0%).CONCLUSIONS: ARA (<4 mm) coverage in patients undergoing standard EVAR or endovascular repair of complex aneurysms is associated with an increased risk of renal infarction. However, we found no clinical effects of ARA coverage on renal function or mortality in early postoperative and follow-up period. Preservation of an ARA >4 mm should be considered.

KW - Acute Kidney Injury/etiology

KW - Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal/diagnostic imaging

KW - Aortic Aneurysm, Thoracic/diagnostic imaging

KW - Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation/adverse effects

KW - Endovascular Procedures/adverse effects

KW - Humans

KW - Kidney Failure, Chronic/etiology

KW - Renal Artery/abnormalities

KW - Risk Assessment

KW - Risk Factors

KW - Time Factors

KW - Treatment Outcome

U2 - 10.1016/j.jvs.2021.06.032

DO - 10.1016/j.jvs.2021.06.032

M3 - SCORING: Review article

C2 - 34197943

VL - 74

SP - 2104-2113.e7

JO - J VASC SURG

JF - J VASC SURG

SN - 0741-5214

IS - 6

ER -