Clinical and analytical validation of Ki-67 in 9069 patients from IBCSG VIII + IX, BIG1-98 and GeparTrio trial

Standard

Clinical and analytical validation of Ki-67 in 9069 patients from IBCSG VIII + IX, BIG1-98 and GeparTrio trial : systematic modulation of interobserver variance in a comprehensive in silico ring trial. / Denkert, Carsten; Budczies, Jan; Regan, Meredith M; Loibl, Sibylle; Dell'Orto, Patrizia; von Minckwitz, Gunter; Mastropasqua, Mauro G; Solbach, Christine; Thürlimann, Beat; Mehta, Keyur; Blohmer, Jens-Uwe; Colleoni, Marco; Müller, Volkmar; Klauschen, Frederick; Ataseven, Beyhan; Engels, Knut; Kammler, Roswitha; Pfitzner, Berit M; Dietel, Manfred; Fasching, Peter A; Viale, Giuseppe.

In: BREAST CANCER RES TR, Vol. 176, No. 3, 08.2019, p. 557-568.

Research output: SCORING: Contribution to journalSCORING: Journal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Denkert, C, Budczies, J, Regan, MM, Loibl, S, Dell'Orto, P, von Minckwitz, G, Mastropasqua, MG, Solbach, C, Thürlimann, B, Mehta, K, Blohmer, J-U, Colleoni, M, Müller, V, Klauschen, F, Ataseven, B, Engels, K, Kammler, R, Pfitzner, BM, Dietel, M, Fasching, PA & Viale, G 2019, 'Clinical and analytical validation of Ki-67 in 9069 patients from IBCSG VIII + IX, BIG1-98 and GeparTrio trial: systematic modulation of interobserver variance in a comprehensive in silico ring trial', BREAST CANCER RES TR, vol. 176, no. 3, pp. 557-568. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-018-05112-9

APA

Denkert, C., Budczies, J., Regan, M. M., Loibl, S., Dell'Orto, P., von Minckwitz, G., Mastropasqua, M. G., Solbach, C., Thürlimann, B., Mehta, K., Blohmer, J-U., Colleoni, M., Müller, V., Klauschen, F., Ataseven, B., Engels, K., Kammler, R., Pfitzner, B. M., Dietel, M., ... Viale, G. (2019). Clinical and analytical validation of Ki-67 in 9069 patients from IBCSG VIII + IX, BIG1-98 and GeparTrio trial: systematic modulation of interobserver variance in a comprehensive in silico ring trial. BREAST CANCER RES TR, 176(3), 557-568. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-018-05112-9

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{139f3bbf339b427f884404f9ce36e42e,
title = "Clinical and analytical validation of Ki-67 in 9069 patients from IBCSG VIII + IX, BIG1-98 and GeparTrio trial: systematic modulation of interobserver variance in a comprehensive in silico ring trial",
abstract = "PURPOSE: Ki-67 has been clinically validated for risk assessment in breast cancer, but the analytical validation and cutpoint-definition remain a challenge. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) are a statistical parameter for Ki-67 interobserver performance. However, the maximum degree of variance among pathologists allowed for meaningful biomarker results has not been defined.METHODS: Different amounts of variance were added to central pathology Ki-67 data (n = 9069) from three cohorts (IBCSGVIII + IX, BIG1-98, GeparTrio) by simulation of 4500 evaluations for each cohort, which were grouped by ICCs, ranging from excellent (ICC = 0.9) to poor concordance (ICC = 0.1). Endpoints were disease-free survival (DFS) and pathological complete response (pCR, GeparTrio).RESULTS: Ki-67 was a significant continuous prognostic marker for DFS over a wide range of cutpoints between 8% and 30% in all three cohorts. In our modelling approach, Ki-67 was a stable prognostic marker despite increased interpathologist variance. Even for a poor ICC of 0.5, one or more significant Ki-67 cutoffs were detected in 86.8% (GeparTrio), 92.4% (IBCSGVIII + IX) and 100% of analyses (BIG1-98). Similarly, in GeparTrio, even with an extremely low ICC of 0.2, 99.6% of analyses were significant for pCR.CONCLUSIONS: Our study shows that Ki-67 is a continuous marker which is extremely robust to pathologist variation. Even if only 50% of variance is attributable to true Ki-67-based proliferation (ICC = 0.5), this information is sufficient to obtain statistically significant differences in clinical cohorts. This stable performance explains the observation that many Ki-67 studies achieve significant results despite relevant interobserver variance and points to a high clinical validity of this biomarker. For clinical decisions based on analysis of individual patient data, ongoing efforts to further reduce interobserver variability, including ring trials and standardized guidelines as well as image analysis approaches, should be continued.",
keywords = "Adult, Aged, Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/adverse effects, Biomarkers, Tumor, Breast Neoplasms/diagnosis, Clinical Trials as Topic, Cohort Studies, Female, Humans, Ki-67 Antigen/metabolism, Middle Aged, Models, Theoretical, Neoadjuvant Therapy, Neoplasm Metastasis, Neoplasm Staging, Observer Variation, Prognosis, Reproducibility of Results, Treatment Outcome",
author = "Carsten Denkert and Jan Budczies and Regan, {Meredith M} and Sibylle Loibl and Patrizia Dell'Orto and {von Minckwitz}, Gunter and Mastropasqua, {Mauro G} and Christine Solbach and Beat Th{\"u}rlimann and Keyur Mehta and Jens-Uwe Blohmer and Marco Colleoni and Volkmar M{\"u}ller and Frederick Klauschen and Beyhan Ataseven and Knut Engels and Roswitha Kammler and Pfitzner, {Berit M} and Manfred Dietel and Fasching, {Peter A} and Giuseppe Viale",
year = "2019",
month = aug,
doi = "10.1007/s10549-018-05112-9",
language = "English",
volume = "176",
pages = "557--568",
journal = "BREAST CANCER RES TR",
issn = "0167-6806",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "3",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Clinical and analytical validation of Ki-67 in 9069 patients from IBCSG VIII + IX, BIG1-98 and GeparTrio trial

T2 - systematic modulation of interobserver variance in a comprehensive in silico ring trial

AU - Denkert, Carsten

AU - Budczies, Jan

AU - Regan, Meredith M

AU - Loibl, Sibylle

AU - Dell'Orto, Patrizia

AU - von Minckwitz, Gunter

AU - Mastropasqua, Mauro G

AU - Solbach, Christine

AU - Thürlimann, Beat

AU - Mehta, Keyur

AU - Blohmer, Jens-Uwe

AU - Colleoni, Marco

AU - Müller, Volkmar

AU - Klauschen, Frederick

AU - Ataseven, Beyhan

AU - Engels, Knut

AU - Kammler, Roswitha

AU - Pfitzner, Berit M

AU - Dietel, Manfred

AU - Fasching, Peter A

AU - Viale, Giuseppe

PY - 2019/8

Y1 - 2019/8

N2 - PURPOSE: Ki-67 has been clinically validated for risk assessment in breast cancer, but the analytical validation and cutpoint-definition remain a challenge. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) are a statistical parameter for Ki-67 interobserver performance. However, the maximum degree of variance among pathologists allowed for meaningful biomarker results has not been defined.METHODS: Different amounts of variance were added to central pathology Ki-67 data (n = 9069) from three cohorts (IBCSGVIII + IX, BIG1-98, GeparTrio) by simulation of 4500 evaluations for each cohort, which were grouped by ICCs, ranging from excellent (ICC = 0.9) to poor concordance (ICC = 0.1). Endpoints were disease-free survival (DFS) and pathological complete response (pCR, GeparTrio).RESULTS: Ki-67 was a significant continuous prognostic marker for DFS over a wide range of cutpoints between 8% and 30% in all three cohorts. In our modelling approach, Ki-67 was a stable prognostic marker despite increased interpathologist variance. Even for a poor ICC of 0.5, one or more significant Ki-67 cutoffs were detected in 86.8% (GeparTrio), 92.4% (IBCSGVIII + IX) and 100% of analyses (BIG1-98). Similarly, in GeparTrio, even with an extremely low ICC of 0.2, 99.6% of analyses were significant for pCR.CONCLUSIONS: Our study shows that Ki-67 is a continuous marker which is extremely robust to pathologist variation. Even if only 50% of variance is attributable to true Ki-67-based proliferation (ICC = 0.5), this information is sufficient to obtain statistically significant differences in clinical cohorts. This stable performance explains the observation that many Ki-67 studies achieve significant results despite relevant interobserver variance and points to a high clinical validity of this biomarker. For clinical decisions based on analysis of individual patient data, ongoing efforts to further reduce interobserver variability, including ring trials and standardized guidelines as well as image analysis approaches, should be continued.

AB - PURPOSE: Ki-67 has been clinically validated for risk assessment in breast cancer, but the analytical validation and cutpoint-definition remain a challenge. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) are a statistical parameter for Ki-67 interobserver performance. However, the maximum degree of variance among pathologists allowed for meaningful biomarker results has not been defined.METHODS: Different amounts of variance were added to central pathology Ki-67 data (n = 9069) from three cohorts (IBCSGVIII + IX, BIG1-98, GeparTrio) by simulation of 4500 evaluations for each cohort, which were grouped by ICCs, ranging from excellent (ICC = 0.9) to poor concordance (ICC = 0.1). Endpoints were disease-free survival (DFS) and pathological complete response (pCR, GeparTrio).RESULTS: Ki-67 was a significant continuous prognostic marker for DFS over a wide range of cutpoints between 8% and 30% in all three cohorts. In our modelling approach, Ki-67 was a stable prognostic marker despite increased interpathologist variance. Even for a poor ICC of 0.5, one or more significant Ki-67 cutoffs were detected in 86.8% (GeparTrio), 92.4% (IBCSGVIII + IX) and 100% of analyses (BIG1-98). Similarly, in GeparTrio, even with an extremely low ICC of 0.2, 99.6% of analyses were significant for pCR.CONCLUSIONS: Our study shows that Ki-67 is a continuous marker which is extremely robust to pathologist variation. Even if only 50% of variance is attributable to true Ki-67-based proliferation (ICC = 0.5), this information is sufficient to obtain statistically significant differences in clinical cohorts. This stable performance explains the observation that many Ki-67 studies achieve significant results despite relevant interobserver variance and points to a high clinical validity of this biomarker. For clinical decisions based on analysis of individual patient data, ongoing efforts to further reduce interobserver variability, including ring trials and standardized guidelines as well as image analysis approaches, should be continued.

KW - Adult

KW - Aged

KW - Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/adverse effects

KW - Biomarkers, Tumor

KW - Breast Neoplasms/diagnosis

KW - Clinical Trials as Topic

KW - Cohort Studies

KW - Female

KW - Humans

KW - Ki-67 Antigen/metabolism

KW - Middle Aged

KW - Models, Theoretical

KW - Neoadjuvant Therapy

KW - Neoplasm Metastasis

KW - Neoplasm Staging

KW - Observer Variation

KW - Prognosis

KW - Reproducibility of Results

KW - Treatment Outcome

U2 - 10.1007/s10549-018-05112-9

DO - 10.1007/s10549-018-05112-9

M3 - SCORING: Journal article

C2 - 31065870

VL - 176

SP - 557

EP - 568

JO - BREAST CANCER RES TR

JF - BREAST CANCER RES TR

SN - 0167-6806

IS - 3

ER -