Circulating Tumor-Macrophage Fusion Cells and Circulating Tumor Cells Complement Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Screening in Patients With Suspicious Lung-RADS 4 Nodules
Standard
Circulating Tumor-Macrophage Fusion Cells and Circulating Tumor Cells Complement Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Screening in Patients With Suspicious Lung-RADS 4 Nodules. / Manjunath, Yariswamy; Suvilesh, Kanve Nagaraj; Mitchem, Jonathan B; Avella Patino, Diego M; Kimchi, Eric T; Staveley-O'Carroll, Kevin F; Pantel, Klaus; Yi, Huang; Li, Guangfu; Harris, Peter K; Chaudhuri, Aadel A; Kaifi, Jussuf T.
In: JCO PRECIS ONCOL, Vol. 6, e2100378, 03.2022.Research output: SCORING: Contribution to journal › SCORING: Journal article › Research › peer-review
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Circulating Tumor-Macrophage Fusion Cells and Circulating Tumor Cells Complement Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Screening in Patients With Suspicious Lung-RADS 4 Nodules
AU - Manjunath, Yariswamy
AU - Suvilesh, Kanve Nagaraj
AU - Mitchem, Jonathan B
AU - Avella Patino, Diego M
AU - Kimchi, Eric T
AU - Staveley-O'Carroll, Kevin F
AU - Pantel, Klaus
AU - Yi, Huang
AU - Li, Guangfu
AU - Harris, Peter K
AU - Chaudhuri, Aadel A
AU - Kaifi, Jussuf T
PY - 2022/3
Y1 - 2022/3
N2 - PURPOSE: Low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) screening of high-risk patients decreases lung cancer-related mortality. However, high false-positive rates associated with LDCT result in unnecessary interventions. To distinguish non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) from benign nodules, in the present study, we integrated cellular liquid biomarkers in patients with suspicious lung nodules (lung cancer screening reporting and data system [Lung-RADS] 4).METHODS: Prospectively, 7.5 mL of blood was collected from 221 individuals (training set: 90 nonscreened NSCLC patients, 74 high-risk screening patients with no/benign nodules [Lung-RADS 1-3], and 20 never smokers; validation set: 37 patients with suspicious nodules [Lung-RADS 4]). Circulating tumor cells (CTCs), CTC clusters, and tumor-macrophage fusion (TMF) cells were identified by blinded analyses. Screening patients underwent a median of two LDCTs (range, 1-4) with a median surveillance time of 30 (range, 11-50) months.RESULTS: In the validation set of 37 Lung-RADS 4 patients, all circulating cellular biomarker counts (P < .005; Wilcoxon test) and positivity rates were significantly higher in 23 biopsy-proven NSCLC patients (CTCs: 23 of 23 [100%], CTC clusters: 6 of 23 [26.1%], and TMF cells: 15 of 23 [65.2%]) than in 14 patients with biopsy-proven benign nodules (6 of 14 [42.9%], 0 of 14 [0%], and 2 of 14 [14.3%]). On the basis of cutoff values from the training set, logistic regression with receiver operating characteristic and area under the curve analyses demonstrated that CTCs (sensitivity: 0.870, specificity: 1.0, and area under the curve: 0.989) and TMF cells (0.652; 0.880; 0.790) complement LDCT in diagnosing NSCLC in Lung-RADS 4 patients.CONCLUSION: Cellular liquid biomarkers have a potential to complement LDCT interpretation of suspicious Lung-RADS 4 nodules to distinguish NSCLC from benign lung nodules. A future prospective, large-scale, multicenter clinical trial should validate the role of cellular liquid biomarkers in improving diagnostic accuracy in high-risk patients with Lung-RADS 4 nodules.
AB - PURPOSE: Low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) screening of high-risk patients decreases lung cancer-related mortality. However, high false-positive rates associated with LDCT result in unnecessary interventions. To distinguish non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) from benign nodules, in the present study, we integrated cellular liquid biomarkers in patients with suspicious lung nodules (lung cancer screening reporting and data system [Lung-RADS] 4).METHODS: Prospectively, 7.5 mL of blood was collected from 221 individuals (training set: 90 nonscreened NSCLC patients, 74 high-risk screening patients with no/benign nodules [Lung-RADS 1-3], and 20 never smokers; validation set: 37 patients with suspicious nodules [Lung-RADS 4]). Circulating tumor cells (CTCs), CTC clusters, and tumor-macrophage fusion (TMF) cells were identified by blinded analyses. Screening patients underwent a median of two LDCTs (range, 1-4) with a median surveillance time of 30 (range, 11-50) months.RESULTS: In the validation set of 37 Lung-RADS 4 patients, all circulating cellular biomarker counts (P < .005; Wilcoxon test) and positivity rates were significantly higher in 23 biopsy-proven NSCLC patients (CTCs: 23 of 23 [100%], CTC clusters: 6 of 23 [26.1%], and TMF cells: 15 of 23 [65.2%]) than in 14 patients with biopsy-proven benign nodules (6 of 14 [42.9%], 0 of 14 [0%], and 2 of 14 [14.3%]). On the basis of cutoff values from the training set, logistic regression with receiver operating characteristic and area under the curve analyses demonstrated that CTCs (sensitivity: 0.870, specificity: 1.0, and area under the curve: 0.989) and TMF cells (0.652; 0.880; 0.790) complement LDCT in diagnosing NSCLC in Lung-RADS 4 patients.CONCLUSION: Cellular liquid biomarkers have a potential to complement LDCT interpretation of suspicious Lung-RADS 4 nodules to distinguish NSCLC from benign lung nodules. A future prospective, large-scale, multicenter clinical trial should validate the role of cellular liquid biomarkers in improving diagnostic accuracy in high-risk patients with Lung-RADS 4 nodules.
KW - Biomarkers
KW - Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/diagnosis
KW - Early Detection of Cancer/methods
KW - Humans
KW - Lung/pathology
KW - Lung Neoplasms/diagnosis
KW - Macrophages/pathology
KW - Neoplastic Cells, Circulating/pathology
KW - Precancerous Conditions
KW - Tomography, X-Ray Computed/methods
U2 - 10.1200/PO.21.00378
DO - 10.1200/PO.21.00378
M3 - SCORING: Journal article
C2 - 35417204
VL - 6
JO - JCO PRECIS ONCOL
JF - JCO PRECIS ONCOL
SN - 2473-4284
M1 - e2100378
ER -