Cardiovascular Outcomes in Adults with Coronary Artery Disease and Obstructive Sleep Apnea with versus without Excessive Daytime Sleepiness in the RICCADSA Cinical Trial

TY - JOUR

T1 - Cardiovascular Outcomes in Adults with Coronary Artery Disease and Obstructive Sleep Apnea with versus without Excessive Daytime Sleepiness in the RICCADSA Cinical Trial

AU - Eulenburg, Christine

AU - Celik, Yeliz

AU - Redline, Susan

AU - Thunström, Erik

AU - Glantz, Helena

AU - Strollo, Patrick J

AU - Peker, Yüksel

PY - 2023/7

Y1 - 2023/7

N2 - Rationale: Recent randomized controlled trials did not show cardiovascular benefits of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) in adults with coronary artery disease (CAD) and obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) in intention-to-treat analyses. It has been argued that exclusion of patients with OSA with excessive daytime sleepiness (EDS), who may be most likely to benefit from CPAP treatment, may be a reason for the null results. Objectives: We addressed 1) the effect of concomitant EDS on adverse outcomes in patients with CAD and OSA; and 2) whether the cardiovascular benefit of CPAP adherence differs between individuals with versus without EDS. Methods: This was a secondary analysis of the RICCADSA (Randomized Intervention with CPAP in CAD and Obstructive Sleep Apnea) trial, conducted in Sweden between 2005 and 2013. Data were analyzed from 155 patients with CAD with OSA (apnea-hypopnea index ⩾ 15/h) and EDS (Epworth Sleepiness Scale score ⩾ 10), who were allocated to CPAP and 244 patients without EDS (ESS < 10), who were randomized to CPAP or no CPAP. Patients who were allocated to no CPAP or were nonadherent (CPAP usage < 4 h/night) were compared with adherent patients (CPAP usage ⩾ 4 h/night) at 1-year follow-up. Inverse probability of treatment weighting was applied to mimic randomization of EDS. The primary endpoint was the first event of repeat revascularization, myocardial infarction, stroke, or cardiovascular mortality. Results: The median follow-up was 52.2 months. The incidence of the primary endpoint did not differ significantly between the EDS versus no-EDS groups in the entire cohort. Within the adherent group, patients without EDS had a significantly decreased risk compared with patients with EDS (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.41; 95% confidence interval, 0.20-0.85; P = 0.02). Conclusions: Adverse cardiovascular outcomes did not differ by degrees of EDS for patients with CAD with OSA who were untreated or nonadherent to treatment. CPAP use, at least 4 h/night, was associated with reduced adverse outcomes in participants without EDS. Clinical trial registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT00519597).

AB - Rationale: Recent randomized controlled trials did not show cardiovascular benefits of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) in adults with coronary artery disease (CAD) and obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) in intention-to-treat analyses. It has been argued that exclusion of patients with OSA with excessive daytime sleepiness (EDS), who may be most likely to benefit from CPAP treatment, may be a reason for the null results. Objectives: We addressed 1) the effect of concomitant EDS on adverse outcomes in patients with CAD and OSA; and 2) whether the cardiovascular benefit of CPAP adherence differs between individuals with versus without EDS. Methods: This was a secondary analysis of the RICCADSA (Randomized Intervention with CPAP in CAD and Obstructive Sleep Apnea) trial, conducted in Sweden between 2005 and 2013. Data were analyzed from 155 patients with CAD with OSA (apnea-hypopnea index ⩾ 15/h) and EDS (Epworth Sleepiness Scale score ⩾ 10), who were allocated to CPAP and 244 patients without EDS (ESS < 10), who were randomized to CPAP or no CPAP. Patients who were allocated to no CPAP or were nonadherent (CPAP usage < 4 h/night) were compared with adherent patients (CPAP usage ⩾ 4 h/night) at 1-year follow-up. Inverse probability of treatment weighting was applied to mimic randomization of EDS. The primary endpoint was the first event of repeat revascularization, myocardial infarction, stroke, or cardiovascular mortality. Results: The median follow-up was 52.2 months. The incidence of the primary endpoint did not differ significantly between the EDS versus no-EDS groups in the entire cohort. Within the adherent group, patients without EDS had a significantly decreased risk compared with patients with EDS (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.41; 95% confidence interval, 0.20-0.85; P = 0.02). Conclusions: Adverse cardiovascular outcomes did not differ by degrees of EDS for patients with CAD with OSA who were untreated or nonadherent to treatment. CPAP use, at least 4 h/night, was associated with reduced adverse outcomes in participants without EDS. Clinical trial registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT00519597).

KW - Adult

KW - Humans

KW - Continuous Positive Airway Pressure/methods

KW - Coronary Artery Disease/complications

KW - Disorders of Excessive Somnolence/epidemiology

KW - Sleep Apnea, Obstructive/complications

KW - Sweden/epidemiology

U2 - 10.1513/AnnalsATS.202208-676OC

DO - 10.1513/AnnalsATS.202208-676OC

M3 - SCORING: Journal article

C2 - 36800433

VL - 20

SP - 1048

EP - 1056

JO - ANN AM THORAC SOC

JF - ANN AM THORAC SOC

SN - 1546-3222

IS - 7

ER -