Cardiovascular health outcomes of mobbing at work: results of the population-based, five-year follow-up of the Gutenberg health study

Standard

Cardiovascular health outcomes of mobbing at work: results of the population-based, five-year follow-up of the Gutenberg health study. / Romero Starke, Karla; Hegewald, Janice; Schulz, Andreas; Garthus-Niegel, Susan; Nübling, Matthias; Wild, Philipp S; Arnold, Natalie; Latza, Ute; Jankowiak, Sylvia; Liebers, Falk; Rossnagel, Karin; Riechmann-Wolf, Merle; Letzel, Stephan; Beutel, Manfred; Pfeiffer, Norbert; Lackner, Karl; Münzel, Thomas; Seidler, Andreas.

In: J OCCUP MED TOXICOL, Vol. 15, 15, 2020.

Research output: SCORING: Contribution to journalSCORING: Journal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Romero Starke, K, Hegewald, J, Schulz, A, Garthus-Niegel, S, Nübling, M, Wild, PS, Arnold, N, Latza, U, Jankowiak, S, Liebers, F, Rossnagel, K, Riechmann-Wolf, M, Letzel, S, Beutel, M, Pfeiffer, N, Lackner, K, Münzel, T & Seidler, A 2020, 'Cardiovascular health outcomes of mobbing at work: results of the population-based, five-year follow-up of the Gutenberg health study', J OCCUP MED TOXICOL, vol. 15, 15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12995-020-00266-z

APA

Romero Starke, K., Hegewald, J., Schulz, A., Garthus-Niegel, S., Nübling, M., Wild, P. S., Arnold, N., Latza, U., Jankowiak, S., Liebers, F., Rossnagel, K., Riechmann-Wolf, M., Letzel, S., Beutel, M., Pfeiffer, N., Lackner, K., Münzel, T., & Seidler, A. (2020). Cardiovascular health outcomes of mobbing at work: results of the population-based, five-year follow-up of the Gutenberg health study. J OCCUP MED TOXICOL, 15, [15]. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12995-020-00266-z

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{2b4f9fb5ab364c9aa76410bee741c4de,
title = "Cardiovascular health outcomes of mobbing at work: results of the population-based, five-year follow-up of the Gutenberg health study",
abstract = "Background: The aim of this study was to determine if there is an increased risk of incident cardiovascular disease (CVD) resulting from workplace mobbing measured with two mobbing instruments in the Gutenberg Health Study.Methods: In this prospective study, we examined working persons younger than 65 years for the presence of mobbing at baseline and at a 5-year follow-up using a single-item and a 5-item instrument. We used multivariate models to investigate the association between mobbing and incident CVD, hypertension, and change in arterial stiffness and further stratified the models by sex.Results: After adjustment for confounders, mobbed workers appeared to have a higher risk of incident CVD than those not mobbed (single-item HR = 1.28, 95% CI 0.73-2.24; 5-item HR = 1.57, 95% CI 0.96-2.54). With the 5-item instrument, men who reported mobbing had a higher risk of incident CVD (HR = 1.77, 95% CI 1.01-3.09), while no association was observed for women (HR = 1.05, 95% CI 0.38-2.91). There was no difference in risks between men and women with the single-item instrument. No association between mobbing and incident hypertension and arterial stiffness was seen.Conclusions: Our results show an indication of an increased risk of incident CVD for those mobbed at baseline when using the whole study population. Differences in risks between men and women when using the five-item instrument may be due to the instrument itself. Still, it is essential to detect or prevent workplace mobbing, and if present, to apply an intervention to halt it in order to minimize its adverse effects on CVD.",
author = "{Romero Starke}, Karla and Janice Hegewald and Andreas Schulz and Susan Garthus-Niegel and Matthias N{\"u}bling and Wild, {Philipp S} and Natalie Arnold and Ute Latza and Sylvia Jankowiak and Falk Liebers and Karin Rossnagel and Merle Riechmann-Wolf and Stephan Letzel and Manfred Beutel and Norbert Pfeiffer and Karl Lackner and Thomas M{\"u}nzel and Andreas Seidler",
note = "{\textcopyright} The Author(s) 2020.",
year = "2020",
doi = "10.1186/s12995-020-00266-z",
language = "English",
volume = "15",
journal = "J OCCUP MED TOXICOL",
issn = "1745-6673",
publisher = "BioMed Central Ltd.",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Cardiovascular health outcomes of mobbing at work: results of the population-based, five-year follow-up of the Gutenberg health study

AU - Romero Starke, Karla

AU - Hegewald, Janice

AU - Schulz, Andreas

AU - Garthus-Niegel, Susan

AU - Nübling, Matthias

AU - Wild, Philipp S

AU - Arnold, Natalie

AU - Latza, Ute

AU - Jankowiak, Sylvia

AU - Liebers, Falk

AU - Rossnagel, Karin

AU - Riechmann-Wolf, Merle

AU - Letzel, Stephan

AU - Beutel, Manfred

AU - Pfeiffer, Norbert

AU - Lackner, Karl

AU - Münzel, Thomas

AU - Seidler, Andreas

N1 - © The Author(s) 2020.

PY - 2020

Y1 - 2020

N2 - Background: The aim of this study was to determine if there is an increased risk of incident cardiovascular disease (CVD) resulting from workplace mobbing measured with two mobbing instruments in the Gutenberg Health Study.Methods: In this prospective study, we examined working persons younger than 65 years for the presence of mobbing at baseline and at a 5-year follow-up using a single-item and a 5-item instrument. We used multivariate models to investigate the association between mobbing and incident CVD, hypertension, and change in arterial stiffness and further stratified the models by sex.Results: After adjustment for confounders, mobbed workers appeared to have a higher risk of incident CVD than those not mobbed (single-item HR = 1.28, 95% CI 0.73-2.24; 5-item HR = 1.57, 95% CI 0.96-2.54). With the 5-item instrument, men who reported mobbing had a higher risk of incident CVD (HR = 1.77, 95% CI 1.01-3.09), while no association was observed for women (HR = 1.05, 95% CI 0.38-2.91). There was no difference in risks between men and women with the single-item instrument. No association between mobbing and incident hypertension and arterial stiffness was seen.Conclusions: Our results show an indication of an increased risk of incident CVD for those mobbed at baseline when using the whole study population. Differences in risks between men and women when using the five-item instrument may be due to the instrument itself. Still, it is essential to detect or prevent workplace mobbing, and if present, to apply an intervention to halt it in order to minimize its adverse effects on CVD.

AB - Background: The aim of this study was to determine if there is an increased risk of incident cardiovascular disease (CVD) resulting from workplace mobbing measured with two mobbing instruments in the Gutenberg Health Study.Methods: In this prospective study, we examined working persons younger than 65 years for the presence of mobbing at baseline and at a 5-year follow-up using a single-item and a 5-item instrument. We used multivariate models to investigate the association between mobbing and incident CVD, hypertension, and change in arterial stiffness and further stratified the models by sex.Results: After adjustment for confounders, mobbed workers appeared to have a higher risk of incident CVD than those not mobbed (single-item HR = 1.28, 95% CI 0.73-2.24; 5-item HR = 1.57, 95% CI 0.96-2.54). With the 5-item instrument, men who reported mobbing had a higher risk of incident CVD (HR = 1.77, 95% CI 1.01-3.09), while no association was observed for women (HR = 1.05, 95% CI 0.38-2.91). There was no difference in risks between men and women with the single-item instrument. No association between mobbing and incident hypertension and arterial stiffness was seen.Conclusions: Our results show an indication of an increased risk of incident CVD for those mobbed at baseline when using the whole study population. Differences in risks between men and women when using the five-item instrument may be due to the instrument itself. Still, it is essential to detect or prevent workplace mobbing, and if present, to apply an intervention to halt it in order to minimize its adverse effects on CVD.

U2 - 10.1186/s12995-020-00266-z

DO - 10.1186/s12995-020-00266-z

M3 - SCORING: Journal article

C2 - 32536961

VL - 15

JO - J OCCUP MED TOXICOL

JF - J OCCUP MED TOXICOL

SN - 1745-6673

M1 - 15

ER -