Research ExplorerPublicationsCan Clinicians Use Dimensional Information to Make a Categor...

Can Clinicians Use Dimensional Information to Make a Categorical Diagnosis of Paraphilic Disorders? An ICD-11 Field Study

Standard

Can Clinicians Use Dimensional Information to Make a Categorical Diagnosis of Paraphilic Disorders? An ICD-11 Field Study. / Keeley, Jared W; Briken, Peer; Evans, Spencer C. ; First, Michael B; Klein, Verena; Krueger, Richard B; Matsumoto, Chihiro; Fresán, Ana; Rebello, Tahilia J; Robles, Rebeca ; Sharan, Pratap; Reed, Geoffrey M.

In: J SEX MED, Vol. 18, No. 9, 09.2021, p. 1592-1606.

Research output: SCORING: Contribution to journal › SCORING: Journal article › Research › peer-review

Harvard

Keeley, JW, Briken, P, Evans, SC, First, MB, Klein, V, Krueger, RB, Matsumoto, C, Fresán, A, Rebello, TJ, Robles, R, Sharan, P & Reed, GM 2021, 'Can Clinicians Use Dimensional Information to Make a Categorical Diagnosis of Paraphilic Disorders? An ICD-11 Field Study', J SEX MED, vol. 18, no. 9, pp. 1592-1606. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsxm.2021.06.016

APA

Keeley, J. W., Briken, P., Evans, S. C., First, M. B., Klein, V., Krueger, R. B., Matsumoto, C., Fresán, A., Rebello, T. J., Robles, R., Sharan, P., & Reed, G. M. (2021). Can Clinicians Use Dimensional Information to Make a Categorical Diagnosis of Paraphilic Disorders? An ICD-11 Field Study. J SEX MED, 18(9), 1592-1606. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsxm.2021.06.016

Vancouver

Keeley JW, Briken P, Evans SC, First MB, Klein V, Krueger RB et al. Can Clinicians Use Dimensional Information to Make a Categorical Diagnosis of Paraphilic Disorders? An ICD-11 Field Study. J SEX MED. 2021 Sep;18(9):1592-1606. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsxm.2021.06.016

Bibtex

@article{2c26d48642654eb6a0a8916f4bebf15a,
title = "Can Clinicians Use Dimensional Information to Make a Categorical Diagnosis of Paraphilic Disorders? An ICD-11 Field Study",
abstract = "BackgroundThe diagnosis of paraphilic disorder is a complicated clinical judgment based on the integration of information from multiple dimensions to arrive at a categorical (present/absent) conclusion. The recent update of the guidelines for paraphilic disorders in ICD-11 presents an opportunity to investigate how mental health professionals use the diagnostic guidelines to arrive at a diagnosis which thereby can optimize the guidelines for clinical use.AimThis study examined clinicians{\textquoteright} ability to use the ICD-11 diagnostic guidelines for paraphilic disorders which contain multiple dimensions that must be simultaneously assessed to arrive at a diagnosis.MethodsThe study investigated the ability of 1,263 international clinicians to identify the dimensions of paraphilic disorder in the context of written case vignettes that varied on a single dimension only.OutcomesParticipants provided diagnoses for the case vignettes along with dimensional ratings of the degree of presence of five dimensions of paraphilic disorder (arousal, consent, action, distress, and risk).ResultsAcross a series of analyses, clinicians demonstrated a clear ability to recognize and appropriately integrate the dimensions of paraphilic disorders; however, there was some evidence that clinicians may over-diagnose non-pathological cases.Clinical TranslationClinicians would likely benefit from targeted training on the ICD-11 definition of paraphilic disorder and should be cautious of over-diagnosing.Strengths and LimitationsThis study represents a large international sample of health professionals and is the first to examine clinicians{\textquoteright} ability to apply the ICD-11 diagnostic guidelines for paraphilic disorders. Important limitations include not generalizing to all clinicians and acknowledging that results may be different in direct clinical interactions vs written case vignettes.ConclusionThese results indicate that clinicians appear capable of interpreting and implementing the diagnostic guidelines for paraphilic disorders in ICD-11. Keeley JW, Briken P, Evans SC, et al. Can Clinicians Use Dimensional Information to Make a Categorical Diagnosis of Paraphilic Disorders? An ICD-11 Field Study. J Sex Med 2021;18:1592–1606.",
author = "Keeley, {Jared W} and Peer Briken and Evans, {Spencer C.} and First, {Michael B} and Verena Klein and Krueger, {Richard B} and Chihiro Matsumoto and Ana Fres{\'a}n and Rebello, {Tahilia J} and Rebeca Robles and Pratap Sharan and Reed, {Geoffrey M}",
year = "2021",
month = sep,
doi = "10.1016/j.jsxm.2021.06.016",
language = "English",
volume = "18",
pages = "1592--1606",
journal = "J SEX MED",
issn = "1743-6095",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "9",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Can Clinicians Use Dimensional Information to Make a Categorical Diagnosis of Paraphilic Disorders? An ICD-11 Field Study

AU - Keeley, Jared W

AU - Briken, Peer

AU - Evans, Spencer C.

AU - First, Michael B

AU - Klein, Verena

AU - Krueger, Richard B

AU - Matsumoto, Chihiro

AU - Fresán, Ana

AU - Rebello, Tahilia J

AU - Robles, Rebeca

AU - Sharan, Pratap

AU - Reed, Geoffrey M

PY - 2021/9

Y1 - 2021/9

N2 - BackgroundThe diagnosis of paraphilic disorder is a complicated clinical judgment based on the integration of information from multiple dimensions to arrive at a categorical (present/absent) conclusion. The recent update of the guidelines for paraphilic disorders in ICD-11 presents an opportunity to investigate how mental health professionals use the diagnostic guidelines to arrive at a diagnosis which thereby can optimize the guidelines for clinical use.AimThis study examined clinicians’ ability to use the ICD-11 diagnostic guidelines for paraphilic disorders which contain multiple dimensions that must be simultaneously assessed to arrive at a diagnosis.MethodsThe study investigated the ability of 1,263 international clinicians to identify the dimensions of paraphilic disorder in the context of written case vignettes that varied on a single dimension only.OutcomesParticipants provided diagnoses for the case vignettes along with dimensional ratings of the degree of presence of five dimensions of paraphilic disorder (arousal, consent, action, distress, and risk).ResultsAcross a series of analyses, clinicians demonstrated a clear ability to recognize and appropriately integrate the dimensions of paraphilic disorders; however, there was some evidence that clinicians may over-diagnose non-pathological cases.Clinical TranslationClinicians would likely benefit from targeted training on the ICD-11 definition of paraphilic disorder and should be cautious of over-diagnosing.Strengths and LimitationsThis study represents a large international sample of health professionals and is the first to examine clinicians’ ability to apply the ICD-11 diagnostic guidelines for paraphilic disorders. Important limitations include not generalizing to all clinicians and acknowledging that results may be different in direct clinical interactions vs written case vignettes.ConclusionThese results indicate that clinicians appear capable of interpreting and implementing the diagnostic guidelines for paraphilic disorders in ICD-11. Keeley JW, Briken P, Evans SC, et al. Can Clinicians Use Dimensional Information to Make a Categorical Diagnosis of Paraphilic Disorders? An ICD-11 Field Study. J Sex Med 2021;18:1592–1606.

AB - BackgroundThe diagnosis of paraphilic disorder is a complicated clinical judgment based on the integration of information from multiple dimensions to arrive at a categorical (present/absent) conclusion. The recent update of the guidelines for paraphilic disorders in ICD-11 presents an opportunity to investigate how mental health professionals use the diagnostic guidelines to arrive at a diagnosis which thereby can optimize the guidelines for clinical use.AimThis study examined clinicians’ ability to use the ICD-11 diagnostic guidelines for paraphilic disorders which contain multiple dimensions that must be simultaneously assessed to arrive at a diagnosis.MethodsThe study investigated the ability of 1,263 international clinicians to identify the dimensions of paraphilic disorder in the context of written case vignettes that varied on a single dimension only.OutcomesParticipants provided diagnoses for the case vignettes along with dimensional ratings of the degree of presence of five dimensions of paraphilic disorder (arousal, consent, action, distress, and risk).ResultsAcross a series of analyses, clinicians demonstrated a clear ability to recognize and appropriately integrate the dimensions of paraphilic disorders; however, there was some evidence that clinicians may over-diagnose non-pathological cases.Clinical TranslationClinicians would likely benefit from targeted training on the ICD-11 definition of paraphilic disorder and should be cautious of over-diagnosing.Strengths and LimitationsThis study represents a large international sample of health professionals and is the first to examine clinicians’ ability to apply the ICD-11 diagnostic guidelines for paraphilic disorders. Important limitations include not generalizing to all clinicians and acknowledging that results may be different in direct clinical interactions vs written case vignettes.ConclusionThese results indicate that clinicians appear capable of interpreting and implementing the diagnostic guidelines for paraphilic disorders in ICD-11. Keeley JW, Briken P, Evans SC, et al. Can Clinicians Use Dimensional Information to Make a Categorical Diagnosis of Paraphilic Disorders? An ICD-11 Field Study. J Sex Med 2021;18:1592–1606.

U2 - 10.1016/j.jsxm.2021.06.016

DO - 10.1016/j.jsxm.2021.06.016

M3 - SCORING: Journal article

VL - 18

SP - 1592

EP - 1606

JO - J SEX MED

JF - J SEX MED

SN - 1743-6095

IS - 9

ER -