Cabazitaxel plus prednisone for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer progressing after docetaxel: results from the German compassionate-use programme.

  • Axel Heidenreich
  • Hans-Jörg Scholz
  • Sebastian Rogenhofer
  • Christian Arsov
  • Margitta Retz
  • Stefan C Müller
  • Peter Albers
  • Jürgen Gschwend
  • Manfred Wirth
  • Ursula Steiner
  • Kurt Miller
  • Elmar Heinrich
  • Lutz Trojan
  • Björn Volkmer
  • Friedemann Ulrich Honecker
  • Carsten Bokemeyer
  • Bastian Keck
  • Burkhard Otremba
  • Evelyne Ecstein-Fraisse
  • David Pfister

Related Research units

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Cabazitaxel (Cbz) is an approved second-line treatment in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) following docetaxel therapy with a significant survival benefit compared with mitoxantrone. However, grade 3/4 toxicities were reported in 82% of patients.

OBJECTIVE: To report on the safety results of mCRPC patients treated within a compassionate-use programme in Germany.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A total of 111 patients with a mean age of 67.9 yr (range: 49-81 yr) and progressive mCRPC were included. Patients had received a mean number of 12.7 ± 10.8 cycles (range: 6-69 cycles) of docetaxel with a mean cumulative dose of 970.9 mg/m(2); mean time from last docetaxel application to progression was 6.95 mo (range: 2-54 mo). Of the patients, 31.5% progressed by prostate-specific antigen (PSA) increase only; the remainder had a combination of PSA increase and clinical progression.

INTERVENTION: Cbz at a dosage of 25mg/m(2) intravenously every 3 wk combined with 5mg of oral prednisone twice a day.

OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Treatment-associated toxicity was the primary study end point; progression-free and overall survival were secondary end points. A descriptive statistical analysis was performed.

RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: Patients received a mean number of 6.5 ± 2.2 cycles of Cbz and a mean cumulative dose of 160.3 ± 51.5mg/m(2). Grade 3 and 4 treatment-emergent adverse events were recorded in 34 patients (30.6%) and 18 patients (16.2%), respectively. Grade 3/4 anaemia, neutropenia, and thrombocytopenia were reported in 4.5%, 7.2%, and 0.9% of the patients, respectively. Neutropenic fever was reported in 1.8% of the patients. Grade 3/4 gastrointestinal toxicity was identified in 4.5% of the patients. Three patients died because of Cbz-related toxicity. Granulocyte colony-stimulating growth factors were used in 17.1% of patients. The limitations are due to the nonrandomised nature of the trial.

CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with Cbz is tolerable and is associated with a low incidence of serious adverse events in a real-world patient population with CRPC. The outcome of serious adverse events can be minimised with proactive treatment management and conscientious monitoring.

Bibliographical data

Original languageEnglish
Article number6
ISSN0302-2838
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2013
pubmed 23116658