Borderline tumours of the ovary: A cohort study of the Arbeitsgmeinschaft Gynäkologische Onkologie (AGO) Study Group
Standard
Borderline tumours of the ovary: A cohort study of the Arbeitsgmeinschaft Gynäkologische Onkologie (AGO) Study Group. / du Bois, Andreas; Ewald-Riegler, Nina; de Gregorio, Nikolaus; Reuss, Alexander; Mahner, Sven; Fotopoulou, Christina; Kommoss, Friedrich; Schmalfeldt, Barbara; Hilpert, Felix; Fehm, Tanja; Burges, Alexander; Meier, Werner; Hillemanns, Peter; Hanker, Lars; Hasenburg, Annette; Strauss, Hans-Georg; Hellriegel, Martin; Wimberger, Pauline; Keyver-Paik, Mignon-Denise; Baumann, Klaus; Canzler, Ulrich; Wollschlaeger, Kerstin; Forner, Dirk; Pfisterer, Jacobus; Schröder, Willibald; Münstedt, Karsten; Richter, Barbara; Kommoss, Stefan; Hauptmann, Steffen; Arbeitsgmeinschaft Gynäkologische Onkologie (AGO) Study Group.
In: EUR J CANCER, Vol. 49, No. 8, 01.05.2013, p. 1905-14.Research output: SCORING: Contribution to journal › SCORING: Journal article › Research › peer-review
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Borderline tumours of the ovary: A cohort study of the Arbeitsgmeinschaft Gynäkologische Onkologie (AGO) Study Group
AU - du Bois, Andreas
AU - Ewald-Riegler, Nina
AU - de Gregorio, Nikolaus
AU - Reuss, Alexander
AU - Mahner, Sven
AU - Fotopoulou, Christina
AU - Kommoss, Friedrich
AU - Schmalfeldt, Barbara
AU - Hilpert, Felix
AU - Fehm, Tanja
AU - Burges, Alexander
AU - Meier, Werner
AU - Hillemanns, Peter
AU - Hanker, Lars
AU - Hasenburg, Annette
AU - Strauss, Hans-Georg
AU - Hellriegel, Martin
AU - Wimberger, Pauline
AU - Keyver-Paik, Mignon-Denise
AU - Baumann, Klaus
AU - Canzler, Ulrich
AU - Wollschlaeger, Kerstin
AU - Forner, Dirk
AU - Pfisterer, Jacobus
AU - Schröder, Willibald
AU - Münstedt, Karsten
AU - Richter, Barbara
AU - Kommoss, Stefan
AU - Hauptmann, Steffen
AU - Arbeitsgmeinschaft Gynäkologische Onkologie (AGO) Study Group
N1 - Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
PY - 2013/5/1
Y1 - 2013/5/1
N2 - BACKGROUND: Borderline ovarian tumours (BOTs) are recognised as a unique entity of ovarian tumours that do not exert infiltrative destructive growth or stromal invasion. Prognosis of BOT is much better compared to the more common invasive epithelial ovarian cancer. Information regarding prognostic factors is inconclusive and no prospective studies exist that evaluate therapeutic strategies. We therefore started a retrospective-prospective cohort study to better understand BOT and identify scenarios in which future studies could be developed.METHODS: Consecutive patients with BOT treated between 1998 and 2008 in 24 German centres were analysed. The retrospective part of the study retrieved patients' data from hospital records and clinical tumour registries while active follow-up and an independent central pathology review were carried out prospectively.FINDINGS: BOT was confirmed in 950 patients, two thirds had serous BOT and 30.5% mucinous BOT. Most were diagnosed in stage I (82.3%); 7.6% and 10.1% had stages II and III, respectively. Overall, 74 patients (7.8%) experienced relapse and 43 (4.5%) died within the observation period. Multivariate analysis revealed higher stage, incomplete staging, tumour residuals, and organ preservation as independent prognostic factors for disease recurrence. Neither microinvasion nor micropapillary growth pattern showed any significant impact. Of 74 relapsed patients, 30% had malignant transformation to invasive ovarian cancer with five-year progression-free survival and overall survival of 12% and 50%, respectively.INTERPRETATION: Prognosis of BOT correlates with tumour-related as well as surgery-related factors. The balance between recurrence risk and organ preservation and fertility-sparing surgery is an important issue deserving further research.
AB - BACKGROUND: Borderline ovarian tumours (BOTs) are recognised as a unique entity of ovarian tumours that do not exert infiltrative destructive growth or stromal invasion. Prognosis of BOT is much better compared to the more common invasive epithelial ovarian cancer. Information regarding prognostic factors is inconclusive and no prospective studies exist that evaluate therapeutic strategies. We therefore started a retrospective-prospective cohort study to better understand BOT and identify scenarios in which future studies could be developed.METHODS: Consecutive patients with BOT treated between 1998 and 2008 in 24 German centres were analysed. The retrospective part of the study retrieved patients' data from hospital records and clinical tumour registries while active follow-up and an independent central pathology review were carried out prospectively.FINDINGS: BOT was confirmed in 950 patients, two thirds had serous BOT and 30.5% mucinous BOT. Most were diagnosed in stage I (82.3%); 7.6% and 10.1% had stages II and III, respectively. Overall, 74 patients (7.8%) experienced relapse and 43 (4.5%) died within the observation period. Multivariate analysis revealed higher stage, incomplete staging, tumour residuals, and organ preservation as independent prognostic factors for disease recurrence. Neither microinvasion nor micropapillary growth pattern showed any significant impact. Of 74 relapsed patients, 30% had malignant transformation to invasive ovarian cancer with five-year progression-free survival and overall survival of 12% and 50%, respectively.INTERPRETATION: Prognosis of BOT correlates with tumour-related as well as surgery-related factors. The balance between recurrence risk and organ preservation and fertility-sparing surgery is an important issue deserving further research.
KW - Adolescent
KW - Adult
KW - Aged
KW - Aged, 80 and over
KW - Cohort Studies
KW - Female
KW - Humans
KW - Kaplan-Meier Estimate
KW - Middle Aged
KW - Multivariate Analysis
KW - Neoplasm Invasiveness
KW - Neoplasm Recurrence, Local
KW - Neoplasm Staging
KW - Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
KW - Ovarian Neoplasms
KW - Ovary
KW - Prognosis
KW - Proportional Hazards Models
KW - Young Adult
U2 - 10.1016/j.ejca.2013.01.035
DO - 10.1016/j.ejca.2013.01.035
M3 - SCORING: Journal article
C2 - 23490647
VL - 49
SP - 1905
EP - 1914
JO - EUR J CANCER
JF - EUR J CANCER
SN - 0959-8049
IS - 8
ER -