Bleeding risk of submuscular ICD implantation with continued oral anticoagulation versus heparin bridging therapy

Standard

Bleeding risk of submuscular ICD implantation with continued oral anticoagulation versus heparin bridging therapy. / Pecha, Simon; Ayikli, Ayhan; Wilke, Iris; Hakmi, Samer; Yildirim, Yalin; Gosau, Nils; Reichenspurner, Hermann; Willems, Stephan; Aydin, Muhammet Ali.

In: HEART VESSELS, Vol. 33, No. 4, 04.2018, p. 441-446.

Research output: SCORING: Contribution to journalSCORING: Journal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{c67d729e666540fa83cb7ab76114ec88,
title = "Bleeding risk of submuscular ICD implantation with continued oral anticoagulation versus heparin bridging therapy",
abstract = "Recent studies have shown that subcutaneous or subfascial pacemaker- and ICD implantation with continued oral anticoagulation therapy is associated with lower risk for bleeding complications, when compared to heparin bridging strategies. However, ICD generators are often implanted submuscularly. We therefore compared the bleeding risk with continued phenprocoumon therapy vs. heparin bridging in patients receiving submuscular ICD implantation. Between 01/2013 and 12/2013, 104 patients with need for oral anticoagulation received submuscular ICD or CRT-D implantation in our institution. 46 patients were implanted under continued phenprocoumon therapy while 58 patients received heparin bridging for implantation procedure. All ICD generators were placed submuscularly. The primary outcome of the study was clinically significant bleeding or device pocket hematoma with need for surgical revision. Mean patients age was 63.7 years, 72.1% were male. In patients with heparin bridging therapy, preoperative INR prior to ICD implantation was 1.2 ± 0.31 while in the group of patients on continued phenprocoumon therapy, mean pre-OP INR was 2.4 ± 0.47. In heparin bridging group, 8 (13.8%) patients experienced a clinically relevant pocket hematoma, while only 1 (2.2%) patient on continued phenprocoumon therapy needed surgical revision for pocket hematoma (P = 0.04). No further bleeding complications or clinically relevant pericardial effusion was observed in any of the groups and no perioperative thromboembolic event occurred. Submuscular ICD implantation under continued phenprocoumon therapy was safe and feasible. Compared to patients with heparin bridging therapy, those with continued phenprocoumon therapy had a lower incidence of clinically relevant bleeding complications.",
keywords = "Aged, Anticoagulants/administration & dosage, Arrhythmias, Cardiac/mortality, Defibrillators, Implantable/adverse effects, Drug Administration Routes, Fascia, Female, Germany/epidemiology, Heparin/administration & dosage, Humans, Male, Postoperative Hemorrhage/chemically induced, Prevalence, Retrospective Studies, Risk Assessment, Survival Rate/trends, Thromboembolism/prevention & control",
author = "Simon Pecha and Ayhan Ayikli and Iris Wilke and Samer Hakmi and Yalin Yildirim and Nils Gosau and Hermann Reichenspurner and Stephan Willems and Aydin, {Muhammet Ali}",
year = "2018",
month = apr,
doi = "10.1007/s00380-017-1064-6",
language = "English",
volume = "33",
pages = "441--446",
journal = "HEART VESSELS",
issn = "0910-8327",
publisher = "Springer Japan",
number = "4",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Bleeding risk of submuscular ICD implantation with continued oral anticoagulation versus heparin bridging therapy

AU - Pecha, Simon

AU - Ayikli, Ayhan

AU - Wilke, Iris

AU - Hakmi, Samer

AU - Yildirim, Yalin

AU - Gosau, Nils

AU - Reichenspurner, Hermann

AU - Willems, Stephan

AU - Aydin, Muhammet Ali

PY - 2018/4

Y1 - 2018/4

N2 - Recent studies have shown that subcutaneous or subfascial pacemaker- and ICD implantation with continued oral anticoagulation therapy is associated with lower risk for bleeding complications, when compared to heparin bridging strategies. However, ICD generators are often implanted submuscularly. We therefore compared the bleeding risk with continued phenprocoumon therapy vs. heparin bridging in patients receiving submuscular ICD implantation. Between 01/2013 and 12/2013, 104 patients with need for oral anticoagulation received submuscular ICD or CRT-D implantation in our institution. 46 patients were implanted under continued phenprocoumon therapy while 58 patients received heparin bridging for implantation procedure. All ICD generators were placed submuscularly. The primary outcome of the study was clinically significant bleeding or device pocket hematoma with need for surgical revision. Mean patients age was 63.7 years, 72.1% were male. In patients with heparin bridging therapy, preoperative INR prior to ICD implantation was 1.2 ± 0.31 while in the group of patients on continued phenprocoumon therapy, mean pre-OP INR was 2.4 ± 0.47. In heparin bridging group, 8 (13.8%) patients experienced a clinically relevant pocket hematoma, while only 1 (2.2%) patient on continued phenprocoumon therapy needed surgical revision for pocket hematoma (P = 0.04). No further bleeding complications or clinically relevant pericardial effusion was observed in any of the groups and no perioperative thromboembolic event occurred. Submuscular ICD implantation under continued phenprocoumon therapy was safe and feasible. Compared to patients with heparin bridging therapy, those with continued phenprocoumon therapy had a lower incidence of clinically relevant bleeding complications.

AB - Recent studies have shown that subcutaneous or subfascial pacemaker- and ICD implantation with continued oral anticoagulation therapy is associated with lower risk for bleeding complications, when compared to heparin bridging strategies. However, ICD generators are often implanted submuscularly. We therefore compared the bleeding risk with continued phenprocoumon therapy vs. heparin bridging in patients receiving submuscular ICD implantation. Between 01/2013 and 12/2013, 104 patients with need for oral anticoagulation received submuscular ICD or CRT-D implantation in our institution. 46 patients were implanted under continued phenprocoumon therapy while 58 patients received heparin bridging for implantation procedure. All ICD generators were placed submuscularly. The primary outcome of the study was clinically significant bleeding or device pocket hematoma with need for surgical revision. Mean patients age was 63.7 years, 72.1% were male. In patients with heparin bridging therapy, preoperative INR prior to ICD implantation was 1.2 ± 0.31 while in the group of patients on continued phenprocoumon therapy, mean pre-OP INR was 2.4 ± 0.47. In heparin bridging group, 8 (13.8%) patients experienced a clinically relevant pocket hematoma, while only 1 (2.2%) patient on continued phenprocoumon therapy needed surgical revision for pocket hematoma (P = 0.04). No further bleeding complications or clinically relevant pericardial effusion was observed in any of the groups and no perioperative thromboembolic event occurred. Submuscular ICD implantation under continued phenprocoumon therapy was safe and feasible. Compared to patients with heparin bridging therapy, those with continued phenprocoumon therapy had a lower incidence of clinically relevant bleeding complications.

KW - Aged

KW - Anticoagulants/administration & dosage

KW - Arrhythmias, Cardiac/mortality

KW - Defibrillators, Implantable/adverse effects

KW - Drug Administration Routes

KW - Fascia

KW - Female

KW - Germany/epidemiology

KW - Heparin/administration & dosage

KW - Humans

KW - Male

KW - Postoperative Hemorrhage/chemically induced

KW - Prevalence

KW - Retrospective Studies

KW - Risk Assessment

KW - Survival Rate/trends

KW - Thromboembolism/prevention & control

U2 - 10.1007/s00380-017-1064-6

DO - 10.1007/s00380-017-1064-6

M3 - SCORING: Journal article

C2 - 29030709

VL - 33

SP - 441

EP - 446

JO - HEART VESSELS

JF - HEART VESSELS

SN - 0910-8327

IS - 4

ER -