Bi-planar calibration method for templating of hip joint arthroplasty: phantom study and proof of concept

Standard

Bi-planar calibration method for templating of hip joint arthroplasty: phantom study and proof of concept. / Boese, Christoph Kolja; Rolvien, Tim; Henes, Frank Oliver; Beil, Frank Timo; Strahl, André; Ries, Christian.

In: INT ORTHOP, Vol. 47, No. 5, 05.2023, p. 1249-1257.

Research output: SCORING: Contribution to journalSCORING: Journal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{54e9e1204e364060b67aadcb4b150d6d,
title = "Bi-planar calibration method for templating of hip joint arthroplasty: phantom study and proof of concept",
abstract = "PURPOSE: Calibration of radiographs is a critical step in digital templating for hip arthroplasty. Calibration errors of > 1.5% lead to over- or undersizing of the templated implants and may affect logistics and patient safety. Contemporary calibration methods are known to be imprecise with average errors of 6.5% and wide variance. A novel bi-planar radiograph-based calibration method is proposed, and a phantom study was conducted as proof of concept.METHODS: A spherical external calibration marker (ECM) is placed in front of the pubic symphysis of a pelvic bone model at twelve different positions. For each marker position, standard anteroposterior radiographs and four corresponding lateral radiographs with different degrees of rotation (0°-30°) are taken (overall, 60 radiographs). Calibration factors are calculated for an internal calibration marker (ICM) at the centre of the right hip (reference) and the ECM using a novel algorithm. Rotation and marker positions simulate foreseeable use errors and misplacements and aim to test robustness of the method against these errors.RESULTS: ECM calibration factor was 125.9% (range 124.7-127.2), and the mean ICM calibration factor was 126.6% (range 126.2-127.1) ([Formula: see text]). Four images (8.3%) were beyond the 1% error threshold (all with 30° rotation). The mean difference was 0.79% (SD 0.49).CONCLUSION: The bi-planar method precisely predicts the true calibration factor of the hip joint plane under various conditions. In lateral radiographs, rotation of up to 20° did not adversely affect the precision and all images had calibration errors below the threshold for clinical significance.",
author = "Boese, {Christoph Kolja} and Tim Rolvien and Henes, {Frank Oliver} and Beil, {Frank Timo} and Andr{\'e} Strahl and Christian Ries",
note = "{\textcopyright} 2023. The Author(s).",
year = "2023",
month = may,
doi = "10.1007/s00264-023-05747-4",
language = "English",
volume = "47",
pages = "1249--1257",
journal = "INT ORTHOP",
issn = "0341-2695",
publisher = "Springer",
number = "5",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Bi-planar calibration method for templating of hip joint arthroplasty: phantom study and proof of concept

AU - Boese, Christoph Kolja

AU - Rolvien, Tim

AU - Henes, Frank Oliver

AU - Beil, Frank Timo

AU - Strahl, André

AU - Ries, Christian

N1 - © 2023. The Author(s).

PY - 2023/5

Y1 - 2023/5

N2 - PURPOSE: Calibration of radiographs is a critical step in digital templating for hip arthroplasty. Calibration errors of > 1.5% lead to over- or undersizing of the templated implants and may affect logistics and patient safety. Contemporary calibration methods are known to be imprecise with average errors of 6.5% and wide variance. A novel bi-planar radiograph-based calibration method is proposed, and a phantom study was conducted as proof of concept.METHODS: A spherical external calibration marker (ECM) is placed in front of the pubic symphysis of a pelvic bone model at twelve different positions. For each marker position, standard anteroposterior radiographs and four corresponding lateral radiographs with different degrees of rotation (0°-30°) are taken (overall, 60 radiographs). Calibration factors are calculated for an internal calibration marker (ICM) at the centre of the right hip (reference) and the ECM using a novel algorithm. Rotation and marker positions simulate foreseeable use errors and misplacements and aim to test robustness of the method against these errors.RESULTS: ECM calibration factor was 125.9% (range 124.7-127.2), and the mean ICM calibration factor was 126.6% (range 126.2-127.1) ([Formula: see text]). Four images (8.3%) were beyond the 1% error threshold (all with 30° rotation). The mean difference was 0.79% (SD 0.49).CONCLUSION: The bi-planar method precisely predicts the true calibration factor of the hip joint plane under various conditions. In lateral radiographs, rotation of up to 20° did not adversely affect the precision and all images had calibration errors below the threshold for clinical significance.

AB - PURPOSE: Calibration of radiographs is a critical step in digital templating for hip arthroplasty. Calibration errors of > 1.5% lead to over- or undersizing of the templated implants and may affect logistics and patient safety. Contemporary calibration methods are known to be imprecise with average errors of 6.5% and wide variance. A novel bi-planar radiograph-based calibration method is proposed, and a phantom study was conducted as proof of concept.METHODS: A spherical external calibration marker (ECM) is placed in front of the pubic symphysis of a pelvic bone model at twelve different positions. For each marker position, standard anteroposterior radiographs and four corresponding lateral radiographs with different degrees of rotation (0°-30°) are taken (overall, 60 radiographs). Calibration factors are calculated for an internal calibration marker (ICM) at the centre of the right hip (reference) and the ECM using a novel algorithm. Rotation and marker positions simulate foreseeable use errors and misplacements and aim to test robustness of the method against these errors.RESULTS: ECM calibration factor was 125.9% (range 124.7-127.2), and the mean ICM calibration factor was 126.6% (range 126.2-127.1) ([Formula: see text]). Four images (8.3%) were beyond the 1% error threshold (all with 30° rotation). The mean difference was 0.79% (SD 0.49).CONCLUSION: The bi-planar method precisely predicts the true calibration factor of the hip joint plane under various conditions. In lateral radiographs, rotation of up to 20° did not adversely affect the precision and all images had calibration errors below the threshold for clinical significance.

U2 - 10.1007/s00264-023-05747-4

DO - 10.1007/s00264-023-05747-4

M3 - SCORING: Journal article

C2 - 36881153

VL - 47

SP - 1249

EP - 1257

JO - INT ORTHOP

JF - INT ORTHOP

SN - 0341-2695

IS - 5

ER -