Bias and imprecision in analysis of real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction data

Standard

Bias and imprecision in analysis of real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction data. / Tellinghuisen, Joel; Spiess, Andrej-Nikolai.

In: ANAL CHEM, Vol. 87, No. 17, 01.09.2015, p. 8925-31.

Research output: SCORING: Contribution to journalSCORING: Journal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{fa4170d125c1407e96c50c0b21bc3680,
title = "Bias and imprecision in analysis of real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction data",
abstract = "Monte Carlo simulations are used to examine the bias and loss of precision that result from experimental error and analysis procedures in real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (PCR). In the limit of small copy numbers (N0), Poisson statistics govern the dispersion in estimates of the quantification cycle (Cq) for replicate experiments, permitting the estimation of N0 from the Cq variance, which is inversely proportional to N0. We derive corrections to expressions given previously for this determination. With increasing N0, the Poisson contribution decreases and other effects, like pipet volume uncertainty (typically >3%), dominate. Cycle-to-cycle variability in the amplification efficiency E produces scale dispersion similar to that for variability in the sensitivity of fluorescence detection. When this E variability is proportional to just the amplification (E - 1), there is insignificant effect on Cq if scale-independent definitions are used for this marker. Single-reaction analysis methods based on the exponential growth equation are inherently low-biased in E and high-biased in N0, and these biases can amount to factor-of-4 or greater error in N0. For estimating Cq, their greatest limitation is use of a constant absolute threshold, making them inefficient for data that exhibit scale variability.",
author = "Joel Tellinghuisen and Andrej-Nikolai Spiess",
year = "2015",
month = sep,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1021/acs.analchem.5b02057",
language = "English",
volume = "87",
pages = "8925--31",
journal = "ANAL CHEM",
issn = "0003-2700",
publisher = "American Chemical Society",
number = "17",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Bias and imprecision in analysis of real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction data

AU - Tellinghuisen, Joel

AU - Spiess, Andrej-Nikolai

PY - 2015/9/1

Y1 - 2015/9/1

N2 - Monte Carlo simulations are used to examine the bias and loss of precision that result from experimental error and analysis procedures in real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (PCR). In the limit of small copy numbers (N0), Poisson statistics govern the dispersion in estimates of the quantification cycle (Cq) for replicate experiments, permitting the estimation of N0 from the Cq variance, which is inversely proportional to N0. We derive corrections to expressions given previously for this determination. With increasing N0, the Poisson contribution decreases and other effects, like pipet volume uncertainty (typically >3%), dominate. Cycle-to-cycle variability in the amplification efficiency E produces scale dispersion similar to that for variability in the sensitivity of fluorescence detection. When this E variability is proportional to just the amplification (E - 1), there is insignificant effect on Cq if scale-independent definitions are used for this marker. Single-reaction analysis methods based on the exponential growth equation are inherently low-biased in E and high-biased in N0, and these biases can amount to factor-of-4 or greater error in N0. For estimating Cq, their greatest limitation is use of a constant absolute threshold, making them inefficient for data that exhibit scale variability.

AB - Monte Carlo simulations are used to examine the bias and loss of precision that result from experimental error and analysis procedures in real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (PCR). In the limit of small copy numbers (N0), Poisson statistics govern the dispersion in estimates of the quantification cycle (Cq) for replicate experiments, permitting the estimation of N0 from the Cq variance, which is inversely proportional to N0. We derive corrections to expressions given previously for this determination. With increasing N0, the Poisson contribution decreases and other effects, like pipet volume uncertainty (typically >3%), dominate. Cycle-to-cycle variability in the amplification efficiency E produces scale dispersion similar to that for variability in the sensitivity of fluorescence detection. When this E variability is proportional to just the amplification (E - 1), there is insignificant effect on Cq if scale-independent definitions are used for this marker. Single-reaction analysis methods based on the exponential growth equation are inherently low-biased in E and high-biased in N0, and these biases can amount to factor-of-4 or greater error in N0. For estimating Cq, their greatest limitation is use of a constant absolute threshold, making them inefficient for data that exhibit scale variability.

U2 - 10.1021/acs.analchem.5b02057

DO - 10.1021/acs.analchem.5b02057

M3 - SCORING: Journal article

C2 - 26235706

VL - 87

SP - 8925

EP - 8931

JO - ANAL CHEM

JF - ANAL CHEM

SN - 0003-2700

IS - 17

ER -