Beneficial effects of denosumab on muscle performance in patients with low BMD: a retrospective, propensity score-matched study

TY - JOUR

T1 - Beneficial effects of denosumab on muscle performance in patients with low BMD: a retrospective, propensity score-matched study

AU - Rupp, Tobias

AU - von Vopelius, Emil

AU - Strahl, André

AU - Oheim, Ralf

AU - Barvencik, Florian

AU - Amling, Michael

AU - Rolvien, Tim

N1 - © 2022. The Author(s).

PY - 2022/10

Y1 - 2022/10

N2 - UNLABELLED: This study examined the effects of denosumab compared to bisphosphonates and vitamin D alone on muscle performance in patients with low BMD. While grip force improved in both the denosumab and bisphosphonate group, a superior increase in chair rising test force was observed in the denosumab group.INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of the anti-resorptive agent denosumab (Dmab) on upper and lower limb muscle performance compared to bisphosphonate (BP) treatment and vitamin D supplementation alone (i.e., basic therapy) in patients with low BMD.METHODS: This retrospective, propensity score-matched (sex, age, BMI, follow-up time) cohort study included 150 osteopenic or osteoporotic patients receiving basic (n = 60), BP (n = 30) or Dmab (n = 60) therapy. All patients underwent a musculoskeletal assessment at baseline and follow-up, including DXA, laboratory bone metabolism parameters, grip force, and chair rising test mechanography. Mean annual percentage changes were calculated and compared between study groups.RESULTS: After a mean follow-up period of 17.6 ± 9.0 months, a significantly higher increase in grip force in both the Dmab (p < 0.001) and BP group (p = 0.001) compared to the vitamin D group was observed (vitamin D =  - 6.1 ± 10.2%; BP =  + 0.8 ± 8.2%; Dmab =  + 5.1 ± 25.5%). The Dmab group showed a significantly higher increase in chair rising test force compared to the BP group (vitamin D =  + 5.8 ± 12.7%; BP =  + 0.9 ± 8.6%; Dmab =  + 8.2 ± 14.4%; Dmab vs. BP p = 0.03). Neither the changes in BMD nor in bone metabolic parameters were associated with changes in muscle performance.CONCLUSION: Dmab resulted in increased muscle strength in the upper and lower limbs, indicating systemic rather than site-specific effects as compared to BP. Based on these findings, Dmab might be favored over other osteoporosis treatments in patients with low BMD and poor muscle strength.

AB - UNLABELLED: This study examined the effects of denosumab compared to bisphosphonates and vitamin D alone on muscle performance in patients with low BMD. While grip force improved in both the denosumab and bisphosphonate group, a superior increase in chair rising test force was observed in the denosumab group.INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of the anti-resorptive agent denosumab (Dmab) on upper and lower limb muscle performance compared to bisphosphonate (BP) treatment and vitamin D supplementation alone (i.e., basic therapy) in patients with low BMD.METHODS: This retrospective, propensity score-matched (sex, age, BMI, follow-up time) cohort study included 150 osteopenic or osteoporotic patients receiving basic (n = 60), BP (n = 30) or Dmab (n = 60) therapy. All patients underwent a musculoskeletal assessment at baseline and follow-up, including DXA, laboratory bone metabolism parameters, grip force, and chair rising test mechanography. Mean annual percentage changes were calculated and compared between study groups.RESULTS: After a mean follow-up period of 17.6 ± 9.0 months, a significantly higher increase in grip force in both the Dmab (p < 0.001) and BP group (p = 0.001) compared to the vitamin D group was observed (vitamin D =  - 6.1 ± 10.2%; BP =  + 0.8 ± 8.2%; Dmab =  + 5.1 ± 25.5%). The Dmab group showed a significantly higher increase in chair rising test force compared to the BP group (vitamin D =  + 5.8 ± 12.7%; BP =  + 0.9 ± 8.6%; Dmab =  + 8.2 ± 14.4%; Dmab vs. BP p = 0.03). Neither the changes in BMD nor in bone metabolic parameters were associated with changes in muscle performance.CONCLUSION: Dmab resulted in increased muscle strength in the upper and lower limbs, indicating systemic rather than site-specific effects as compared to BP. Based on these findings, Dmab might be favored over other osteoporosis treatments in patients with low BMD and poor muscle strength.

U2 - 10.1007/s00198-022-06470-3

DO - 10.1007/s00198-022-06470-3

M3 - SCORING: Journal article

C2 - 35751664

VL - 33

SP - 2177

EP - 2184

JO - OSTEOPOROSIS INT

JF - OSTEOPOROSIS INT

SN - 0937-941X

IS - 10

ER -