Baseline correction does not improve flow quantification in phase-contrast velocity measurement for routine clinical practice

Standard

Baseline correction does not improve flow quantification in phase-contrast velocity measurement for routine clinical practice. / Meierhofer, Christian; Lyko, Christine; Schneider, Eike Philipp; Stern, Heiko; Martinoff, Stefan; Hess, John; Fratz, Sohrab.

In: CLIN IMAG, Vol. 39, No. 3, 11.02.2015, p. 427-431.

Research output: SCORING: Contribution to journalSCORING: Journal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{e4f791634b8743e384a39bad72f7f8b3,
title = "Baseline correction does not improve flow quantification in phase-contrast velocity measurement for routine clinical practice",
abstract = "INTRODUCTION: Velocity offset errors may influence flow measurement in phase-contrast cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR). By using a stationary gel phantom, offset errors probably may be corrected. We tested its impact on flow measurement and, in particular, on shunt calculation in patients proven not to have any shunt.METHODS: Flow measurements were carried out in 24 patients with congenital heart disease. Baseline correction was performed by using a stationary gel phantom.RESULTS: Significantly more patients without shunts incorrectly showed a calculated shunt after baseline correction.CONCLUSIONS: Baseline correction did not improve flow measurement and was clinically not relevant for routine CMR.",
keywords = "Blood Flow Velocity, Female, Heart Defects, Congenital/physiopathology, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging/instrumentation, Male, Phantoms, Imaging",
author = "Christian Meierhofer and Christine Lyko and Schneider, {Eike Philipp} and Heiko Stern and Stefan Martinoff and John Hess and Sohrab Fratz",
note = "Copyright {\textcopyright} 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.",
year = "2015",
month = feb,
day = "11",
doi = "10.1016/j.clinimag.2014.12.010",
language = "English",
volume = "39",
pages = "427--431",
journal = "CLIN IMAG",
issn = "0899-7071",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "3",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Baseline correction does not improve flow quantification in phase-contrast velocity measurement for routine clinical practice

AU - Meierhofer, Christian

AU - Lyko, Christine

AU - Schneider, Eike Philipp

AU - Stern, Heiko

AU - Martinoff, Stefan

AU - Hess, John

AU - Fratz, Sohrab

N1 - Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

PY - 2015/2/11

Y1 - 2015/2/11

N2 - INTRODUCTION: Velocity offset errors may influence flow measurement in phase-contrast cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR). By using a stationary gel phantom, offset errors probably may be corrected. We tested its impact on flow measurement and, in particular, on shunt calculation in patients proven not to have any shunt.METHODS: Flow measurements were carried out in 24 patients with congenital heart disease. Baseline correction was performed by using a stationary gel phantom.RESULTS: Significantly more patients without shunts incorrectly showed a calculated shunt after baseline correction.CONCLUSIONS: Baseline correction did not improve flow measurement and was clinically not relevant for routine CMR.

AB - INTRODUCTION: Velocity offset errors may influence flow measurement in phase-contrast cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR). By using a stationary gel phantom, offset errors probably may be corrected. We tested its impact on flow measurement and, in particular, on shunt calculation in patients proven not to have any shunt.METHODS: Flow measurements were carried out in 24 patients with congenital heart disease. Baseline correction was performed by using a stationary gel phantom.RESULTS: Significantly more patients without shunts incorrectly showed a calculated shunt after baseline correction.CONCLUSIONS: Baseline correction did not improve flow measurement and was clinically not relevant for routine CMR.

KW - Blood Flow Velocity

KW - Female

KW - Heart Defects, Congenital/physiopathology

KW - Humans

KW - Magnetic Resonance Imaging/instrumentation

KW - Male

KW - Phantoms, Imaging

U2 - 10.1016/j.clinimag.2014.12.010

DO - 10.1016/j.clinimag.2014.12.010

M3 - SCORING: Journal article

C2 - 25661574

VL - 39

SP - 427

EP - 431

JO - CLIN IMAG

JF - CLIN IMAG

SN - 0899-7071

IS - 3

ER -