Balloon- vs Self-Expanding Valve Systems for Failed Small Surgical Aortic Valve Bioprostheses

  • Josep Rodés-Cabau
  • Amr E Abbas
  • Vicenç Serra
  • Victoria Vilalta
  • Luis Nombela-Franco
  • Ander Regueiro
  • Karim M Al-Azizi
  • Ayman Iskander
  • Lenard Conradi
  • Jessica Forcillo
  • Scott Lilly
  • Alvaro Calabuig
  • Eduard Fernandez-Nofrerias
  • Siamak Mohammadi
  • Vassili Panagides
  • Emilie Pelletier-Beaumont
  • Philippe Pibarot

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Data comparing valve systems in the valve-in-valve transcatheter aortic valve replacement (ViV-TAVR) field have been obtained from retrospective studies.

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to compare the hemodynamic results between the balloon-expandable valve (BEV) SAPIEN (3/ULTRA, Edwards Lifesciences) and self-expanding valve (SEV) Evolut (R/PRO/PRO+, Medtronic) in ViV-TAVR.

METHODS: Patients with a failed small (≤23 mm) surgical valve were randomized to receive a BEV or an SEV. The primary endpoint was valve hemodynamics (maximal/mean residual gradients, severe prosthesis patient mismatch [PPM], or moderate-severe aortic regurgitation) at 30 days as evaluated by Doppler echocardiography.

RESULTS: A total of 102 patients were randomized, and of these, 98 patients finally underwent a ViV-TAVR procedure (BEV: n = 46, SEV: n = 52). The procedure was successful in all cases, with no differences in clinical outcomes at 30 days between groups (no death or stroke events). Patients in the SEV group exhibited lower mean and maximal transvalvular gradient values (15 ± 8 mm Hg vs 23 ± 8 mm Hg; P ˂ 0.001; 28 ± 16 mm Hg vs 40 ± 13 mm Hg, P ˂ 0.001), and a tendency toward a lower rate of severe PPM (44% vs 64%; P = 0.07). There were no cases of moderate-severe aortic regurgitation. In total, 55 consecutive patients (SEV: n = 27; BEV: n = 28) underwent invasive valve hemodynamic evaluation during the procedure, with no differences in mean and peak transvalvular gradients between both groups (P = 0.41 and P = 0.70, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS: In patients with small failed aortic bioprostheses, ViV-TAVR with an SEV was associated with improved valve hemodynamics as evaluated by echocardiography. There were no differences between groups in intraprocedural invasive valve hemodynamics and 30-day clinical outcomes (Comparison of the Balloon-Expandable Edwards Valve and Self-Expandable CoreValve Evolut R or Evolut PRO System for the Treatment of Small, Severely Dysfunctional Surgical Aortic Bioprostheses. The 'LYTEN' Trial; NCT03520101).

Bibliographical data

Original languageEnglish
ISSN0735-1097
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 16.08.2022

Comment Deanary

Copyright © 2022 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

PubMed 35597385