Association of De Ritis ratio with oncological outcomes in patients with non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC)

Standard

Association of De Ritis ratio with oncological outcomes in patients with non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC). / Laukhtina, Ekaterina; Mostafaei, Hadi; D'Andrea, David; Pradere, Benjamin; Quhal, Fahad; Mori, Keiichiro; Miura, Noriyoshi; Schuettfort, Victor M; Sari Motlagh, Reza; Aydh, Abdulmajeed; Abufaraj, Mohammad; Karakiewicz, Pierre I; Enikeev, Dmitry; Kimura, Shoji; Shariat, Shahrokh F.

In: WORLD J UROL, Vol. 39, No. 6, 06.2021, p. 1961-1968.

Research output: SCORING: Contribution to journalSCORING: Journal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Laukhtina, E, Mostafaei, H, D'Andrea, D, Pradere, B, Quhal, F, Mori, K, Miura, N, Schuettfort, VM, Sari Motlagh, R, Aydh, A, Abufaraj, M, Karakiewicz, PI, Enikeev, D, Kimura, S & Shariat, SF 2021, 'Association of De Ritis ratio with oncological outcomes in patients with non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC)', WORLD J UROL, vol. 39, no. 6, pp. 1961-1968. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-020-03384-9

APA

Laukhtina, E., Mostafaei, H., D'Andrea, D., Pradere, B., Quhal, F., Mori, K., Miura, N., Schuettfort, V. M., Sari Motlagh, R., Aydh, A., Abufaraj, M., Karakiewicz, P. I., Enikeev, D., Kimura, S., & Shariat, S. F. (2021). Association of De Ritis ratio with oncological outcomes in patients with non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC). WORLD J UROL, 39(6), 1961-1968. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-020-03384-9

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{85851a336e88416682ab69dc51d5427b,
title = "Association of De Ritis ratio with oncological outcomes in patients with non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC)",
abstract = "PURPOSE: The De Ritis ratio (aspartate aminotransferase/alanine aminotransferase, DRR) has been linked to oncological outcomes in several cancers. We aimed to assess the association of DRR with recurrence-free survival (RFS) and progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC).METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of 1117 patients diagnosed with NMIBC originating from an established multicenter database. To define the optimal pretreatment DRR cut-off value, we determined a value of 1.2 as having a maximum Youden index value. The overall population was therefore divided into two De Ritis ratio groups using this cut-off (lower, < 1.2 vs. higher, ≥ 1.2). Univariable and multivariable Cox regression analyses were used to investigate the association of DRR with RFS and PFS. The discrimination of the model was evaluated with the Harrel's concordance index (C-index).RESULTS: Overall, 405 (36%) patients had a DRR ≥ 1.2. On univariable Cox regression analysis, DRR was significantly associated with RFS (HR: 1.23, 95% CI 1.02-1.47, p = 0.03), but not with PFS (HR: 0.96, 95% CI 0.65-1.44, p = 0.9). On multivariable Cox regression analysis, which adjusted for the effect of established clinicopathologic features, DRR ≥ 1.2 remained significantly associated with worse RFS (HR:1.21, 95% CI 1.00-1.46, p = 0.04). The addition of DRR only minimally improved the discrimination of a base model that included established clinicopathologic features (C-index = 0.683 vs. C-index = 0.681). On DCA the inclusion of DRR did not improve the net-benefit of the prognostic model.CONCLUSION: Despite the statistically significant association of the DRR with RFS in patients with NMIBC, it does not seem to add any prognostic or clinical benefit beyond that of currently available clinical factors.",
author = "Ekaterina Laukhtina and Hadi Mostafaei and David D'Andrea and Benjamin Pradere and Fahad Quhal and Keiichiro Mori and Noriyoshi Miura and Schuettfort, {Victor M} and {Sari Motlagh}, Reza and Abdulmajeed Aydh and Mohammad Abufaraj and Karakiewicz, {Pierre I} and Dmitry Enikeev and Shoji Kimura and Shariat, {Shahrokh F}",
year = "2021",
month = jun,
doi = "10.1007/s00345-020-03384-9",
language = "English",
volume = "39",
pages = "1961--1968",
journal = "WORLD J UROL",
issn = "0724-4983",
publisher = "Springer",
number = "6",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Association of De Ritis ratio with oncological outcomes in patients with non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC)

AU - Laukhtina, Ekaterina

AU - Mostafaei, Hadi

AU - D'Andrea, David

AU - Pradere, Benjamin

AU - Quhal, Fahad

AU - Mori, Keiichiro

AU - Miura, Noriyoshi

AU - Schuettfort, Victor M

AU - Sari Motlagh, Reza

AU - Aydh, Abdulmajeed

AU - Abufaraj, Mohammad

AU - Karakiewicz, Pierre I

AU - Enikeev, Dmitry

AU - Kimura, Shoji

AU - Shariat, Shahrokh F

PY - 2021/6

Y1 - 2021/6

N2 - PURPOSE: The De Ritis ratio (aspartate aminotransferase/alanine aminotransferase, DRR) has been linked to oncological outcomes in several cancers. We aimed to assess the association of DRR with recurrence-free survival (RFS) and progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC).METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of 1117 patients diagnosed with NMIBC originating from an established multicenter database. To define the optimal pretreatment DRR cut-off value, we determined a value of 1.2 as having a maximum Youden index value. The overall population was therefore divided into two De Ritis ratio groups using this cut-off (lower, < 1.2 vs. higher, ≥ 1.2). Univariable and multivariable Cox regression analyses were used to investigate the association of DRR with RFS and PFS. The discrimination of the model was evaluated with the Harrel's concordance index (C-index).RESULTS: Overall, 405 (36%) patients had a DRR ≥ 1.2. On univariable Cox regression analysis, DRR was significantly associated with RFS (HR: 1.23, 95% CI 1.02-1.47, p = 0.03), but not with PFS (HR: 0.96, 95% CI 0.65-1.44, p = 0.9). On multivariable Cox regression analysis, which adjusted for the effect of established clinicopathologic features, DRR ≥ 1.2 remained significantly associated with worse RFS (HR:1.21, 95% CI 1.00-1.46, p = 0.04). The addition of DRR only minimally improved the discrimination of a base model that included established clinicopathologic features (C-index = 0.683 vs. C-index = 0.681). On DCA the inclusion of DRR did not improve the net-benefit of the prognostic model.CONCLUSION: Despite the statistically significant association of the DRR with RFS in patients with NMIBC, it does not seem to add any prognostic or clinical benefit beyond that of currently available clinical factors.

AB - PURPOSE: The De Ritis ratio (aspartate aminotransferase/alanine aminotransferase, DRR) has been linked to oncological outcomes in several cancers. We aimed to assess the association of DRR with recurrence-free survival (RFS) and progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC).METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of 1117 patients diagnosed with NMIBC originating from an established multicenter database. To define the optimal pretreatment DRR cut-off value, we determined a value of 1.2 as having a maximum Youden index value. The overall population was therefore divided into two De Ritis ratio groups using this cut-off (lower, < 1.2 vs. higher, ≥ 1.2). Univariable and multivariable Cox regression analyses were used to investigate the association of DRR with RFS and PFS. The discrimination of the model was evaluated with the Harrel's concordance index (C-index).RESULTS: Overall, 405 (36%) patients had a DRR ≥ 1.2. On univariable Cox regression analysis, DRR was significantly associated with RFS (HR: 1.23, 95% CI 1.02-1.47, p = 0.03), but not with PFS (HR: 0.96, 95% CI 0.65-1.44, p = 0.9). On multivariable Cox regression analysis, which adjusted for the effect of established clinicopathologic features, DRR ≥ 1.2 remained significantly associated with worse RFS (HR:1.21, 95% CI 1.00-1.46, p = 0.04). The addition of DRR only minimally improved the discrimination of a base model that included established clinicopathologic features (C-index = 0.683 vs. C-index = 0.681). On DCA the inclusion of DRR did not improve the net-benefit of the prognostic model.CONCLUSION: Despite the statistically significant association of the DRR with RFS in patients with NMIBC, it does not seem to add any prognostic or clinical benefit beyond that of currently available clinical factors.

U2 - 10.1007/s00345-020-03384-9

DO - 10.1007/s00345-020-03384-9

M3 - SCORING: Journal article

C2 - 32808107

VL - 39

SP - 1961

EP - 1968

JO - WORLD J UROL

JF - WORLD J UROL

SN - 0724-4983

IS - 6

ER -