Assessment of systemic and gastrointestinal tissue damage biomarkers for GVHD risk stratification
Standard
Assessment of systemic and gastrointestinal tissue damage biomarkers for GVHD risk stratification. / Etra, Aaron; Gergoudis, Stephanie; Morales, George; Spyrou, Nikolaos; Shah, Jay; Kowalyk, Steven; Ayuk, Francis; Baez, Janna; Chanswangphuwana, Chantiya; Chen, Yi-Bin; Choe, Hannah; DeFilipp, Zachariah; Gandhi, Isha; Hexner, Elizabeth; Hogan, William J; Holler, Ernst; Kapoor, Urvi; Kitko, Carrie L; Kraus, Sabrina; Lin, Jung-Yi; Al Malki, Monzr; Merli, Pietro; Pawarode, Attaphol; Pulsipher, Michael A; Qayed, Muna; Reshef, Ran; Rösler, Wolf; Schechter, Tal; Van Hyfte, Grace; Weber, Daniela; Wölfl, Matthias; Young, Rachel; Özbek, Umut; Ferrara, James L M; Levine, John E.
In: BLOOD ADV, Vol. 6, No. 12, 28.06.2022, p. 3707-3715.Research output: SCORING: Contribution to journal › SCORING: Journal article › Research › peer-review
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Assessment of systemic and gastrointestinal tissue damage biomarkers for GVHD risk stratification
AU - Etra, Aaron
AU - Gergoudis, Stephanie
AU - Morales, George
AU - Spyrou, Nikolaos
AU - Shah, Jay
AU - Kowalyk, Steven
AU - Ayuk, Francis
AU - Baez, Janna
AU - Chanswangphuwana, Chantiya
AU - Chen, Yi-Bin
AU - Choe, Hannah
AU - DeFilipp, Zachariah
AU - Gandhi, Isha
AU - Hexner, Elizabeth
AU - Hogan, William J
AU - Holler, Ernst
AU - Kapoor, Urvi
AU - Kitko, Carrie L
AU - Kraus, Sabrina
AU - Lin, Jung-Yi
AU - Al Malki, Monzr
AU - Merli, Pietro
AU - Pawarode, Attaphol
AU - Pulsipher, Michael A
AU - Qayed, Muna
AU - Reshef, Ran
AU - Rösler, Wolf
AU - Schechter, Tal
AU - Van Hyfte, Grace
AU - Weber, Daniela
AU - Wölfl, Matthias
AU - Young, Rachel
AU - Özbek, Umut
AU - Ferrara, James L M
AU - Levine, John E
N1 - © 2022 by The American Society of Hematology. Licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), permitting only noncommercial, nonderivative use with attribution. All other rights reserved.
PY - 2022/6/28
Y1 - 2022/6/28
N2 - We used a rigorous PRoBE (prospective-specimen collection, retrospective-blinded-evaluation) study design to compare the ability of biomarkers of systemic inflammation and biomarkers of gastrointestinal (GI) tissue damage to predict response to corticosteroid treatment, the incidence of clinically severe disease, 6-month nonrelapse mortality (NRM), and overall survival in patients with acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). We prospectively collected serum samples of newly diagnosed GVHD patients (n = 730) from 19 centers, divided them into training (n = 352) and validation (n = 378) cohorts, and measured TNFR1, TIM3, IL6, ST2, and REG3α via enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Performances of the 4 strongest algorithms from the training cohort (TNFR1 + TIM3, TNFR1 + ST2, TNFR1 + REG3α, and ST2 + REG3α) were evaluated in the validation cohort. The algorithm that included only biomarkers of systemic inflammation (TNFR1 + TIM3) had a significantly smaller area under the curve (AUC; 0.57) than the AUCs of algorithms that contained ≥1 GI damage biomarker (TNFR1 + ST2, 0.70; TNFR1 + REG3α, 0.73; ST2 + REG3α, 0.79; all P < .001). All 4 algorithms were able to predict short-term outcomes such as response to systemic corticosteroids and severe GVHD, but the inclusion of a GI damage biomarker was needed to predict long-term outcomes such as 6-month NRM and survival. The algorithm that included 2 GI damage biomarkers was the most accurate of the 4 algorithms for all endpoints.
AB - We used a rigorous PRoBE (prospective-specimen collection, retrospective-blinded-evaluation) study design to compare the ability of biomarkers of systemic inflammation and biomarkers of gastrointestinal (GI) tissue damage to predict response to corticosteroid treatment, the incidence of clinically severe disease, 6-month nonrelapse mortality (NRM), and overall survival in patients with acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). We prospectively collected serum samples of newly diagnosed GVHD patients (n = 730) from 19 centers, divided them into training (n = 352) and validation (n = 378) cohorts, and measured TNFR1, TIM3, IL6, ST2, and REG3α via enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Performances of the 4 strongest algorithms from the training cohort (TNFR1 + TIM3, TNFR1 + ST2, TNFR1 + REG3α, and ST2 + REG3α) were evaluated in the validation cohort. The algorithm that included only biomarkers of systemic inflammation (TNFR1 + TIM3) had a significantly smaller area under the curve (AUC; 0.57) than the AUCs of algorithms that contained ≥1 GI damage biomarker (TNFR1 + ST2, 0.70; TNFR1 + REG3α, 0.73; ST2 + REG3α, 0.79; all P < .001). All 4 algorithms were able to predict short-term outcomes such as response to systemic corticosteroids and severe GVHD, but the inclusion of a GI damage biomarker was needed to predict long-term outcomes such as 6-month NRM and survival. The algorithm that included 2 GI damage biomarkers was the most accurate of the 4 algorithms for all endpoints.
KW - Biomarkers
KW - Graft vs Host Disease/diagnosis
KW - Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation/adverse effects
KW - Hepatitis A Virus Cellular Receptor 2
KW - Humans
KW - Inflammation
KW - Interleukin-1 Receptor-Like 1 Protein
KW - Prospective Studies
KW - Receptors, Tumor Necrosis Factor, Type I
KW - Retrospective Studies
KW - Risk Assessment
U2 - 10.1182/bloodadvances.2022007296
DO - 10.1182/bloodadvances.2022007296
M3 - SCORING: Journal article
C2 - 35443021
VL - 6
SP - 3707
EP - 3715
JO - BLOOD ADV
JF - BLOOD ADV
SN - 2473-9529
IS - 12
ER -