Assessing volume responsiveness using right ventricular dynamic indicators of preload

Standard

Assessing volume responsiveness using right ventricular dynamic indicators of preload. / Graessler, Michael F; Wodack, Karin H; Pinnschmidt, Hans O; Nishimoto, Sarah; Behem, Christoph R; Reuter, Daniel A; Trepte, Constantin J C.

In: J ANESTH, Vol. 35, No. 4, 08.2021, p. 488-494.

Research output: SCORING: Contribution to journalSCORING: Journal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{e74a976d11da46bd9ea6be00532a6198,
title = "Assessing volume responsiveness using right ventricular dynamic indicators of preload",
abstract = "PURPOSE: Dynamic indicators of preload currently only do reflect preload requirements of the left ventricle. To date, no dynamic indicators of right ventricular preload have been established. The aim of this study was to calculate dynamic indicators of right ventricular preload and assess their ability to predict ventricular volume responsiveness.MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study was designed as experimental trial in 20 anaesthetized pigs. Micro-tip catheters and ultrasonic flow probes were used as experimental reference to enable measurement of right ventricular stroke volume and pulse pressure. Hypovolemia was induced (withdrawal of blood 20 ml/kg) and thereafter three volume-loading steps were performed. ROC analysis was performed to assess the ability of dynamic right ventricular parameters to predict volume response.RESULTS: ROC analysis revealed an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.82 (CI 95% 0.73-0.89; p < 0.001) for right ventricular stroke volume variation (SVVRV), an AUC of 0.72 (CI 95% 0.53-0.85; p = 0.02) for pulmonary artery pulse pressure variation (PPVPA) and an AUC of 0.66 (CI 95% 0.51-0.79; p = 0.04) for pulmonary artery systolic pressure variation (SPVPA).CONCLUSIONS: In our experimental animal setting, calculating dynamic indicators of right ventricular preload is possible and appears promising in predicting volume responsiveness.",
author = "Graessler, {Michael F} and Wodack, {Karin H} and Pinnschmidt, {Hans O} and Sarah Nishimoto and Behem, {Christoph R} and Reuter, {Daniel A} and Trepte, {Constantin J C}",
year = "2021",
month = aug,
doi = "10.1007/s00540-021-02937-5",
language = "English",
volume = "35",
pages = "488--494",
journal = "J ANESTH",
issn = "0913-8668",
publisher = "Springer Japan",
number = "4",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Assessing volume responsiveness using right ventricular dynamic indicators of preload

AU - Graessler, Michael F

AU - Wodack, Karin H

AU - Pinnschmidt, Hans O

AU - Nishimoto, Sarah

AU - Behem, Christoph R

AU - Reuter, Daniel A

AU - Trepte, Constantin J C

PY - 2021/8

Y1 - 2021/8

N2 - PURPOSE: Dynamic indicators of preload currently only do reflect preload requirements of the left ventricle. To date, no dynamic indicators of right ventricular preload have been established. The aim of this study was to calculate dynamic indicators of right ventricular preload and assess their ability to predict ventricular volume responsiveness.MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study was designed as experimental trial in 20 anaesthetized pigs. Micro-tip catheters and ultrasonic flow probes were used as experimental reference to enable measurement of right ventricular stroke volume and pulse pressure. Hypovolemia was induced (withdrawal of blood 20 ml/kg) and thereafter three volume-loading steps were performed. ROC analysis was performed to assess the ability of dynamic right ventricular parameters to predict volume response.RESULTS: ROC analysis revealed an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.82 (CI 95% 0.73-0.89; p < 0.001) for right ventricular stroke volume variation (SVVRV), an AUC of 0.72 (CI 95% 0.53-0.85; p = 0.02) for pulmonary artery pulse pressure variation (PPVPA) and an AUC of 0.66 (CI 95% 0.51-0.79; p = 0.04) for pulmonary artery systolic pressure variation (SPVPA).CONCLUSIONS: In our experimental animal setting, calculating dynamic indicators of right ventricular preload is possible and appears promising in predicting volume responsiveness.

AB - PURPOSE: Dynamic indicators of preload currently only do reflect preload requirements of the left ventricle. To date, no dynamic indicators of right ventricular preload have been established. The aim of this study was to calculate dynamic indicators of right ventricular preload and assess their ability to predict ventricular volume responsiveness.MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study was designed as experimental trial in 20 anaesthetized pigs. Micro-tip catheters and ultrasonic flow probes were used as experimental reference to enable measurement of right ventricular stroke volume and pulse pressure. Hypovolemia was induced (withdrawal of blood 20 ml/kg) and thereafter three volume-loading steps were performed. ROC analysis was performed to assess the ability of dynamic right ventricular parameters to predict volume response.RESULTS: ROC analysis revealed an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.82 (CI 95% 0.73-0.89; p < 0.001) for right ventricular stroke volume variation (SVVRV), an AUC of 0.72 (CI 95% 0.53-0.85; p = 0.02) for pulmonary artery pulse pressure variation (PPVPA) and an AUC of 0.66 (CI 95% 0.51-0.79; p = 0.04) for pulmonary artery systolic pressure variation (SPVPA).CONCLUSIONS: In our experimental animal setting, calculating dynamic indicators of right ventricular preload is possible and appears promising in predicting volume responsiveness.

U2 - 10.1007/s00540-021-02937-5

DO - 10.1007/s00540-021-02937-5

M3 - SCORING: Journal article

C2 - 33950295

VL - 35

SP - 488

EP - 494

JO - J ANESTH

JF - J ANESTH

SN - 0913-8668

IS - 4

ER -