Assessing the frequency of deep lingual concavities in 826 posterior mandible sockets

Linda Bodart; Henning Hanken; Ralf Smeets; Martin Gosau; Chenxi Li; Lan Kluwe; Jan Klatt

doi:10.1016/j.jcms.2020.09.001

Assessing the frequency of deep lingual concavities in 826 posterior mandible sockets

Standard

Assessing the frequency of deep lingual concavities in 826 posterior mandible sockets. / Bodart, Linda; Hanken, Henning; Smeets, Ralf ; Gosau, Martin; Li, Chenxi; Kluwe, Lan; Klatt, Jan.

In: J CRANIO MAXILL SURG, Vol. 48, No. 11, 11.2020, p. 1045-1051.

Research output: SCORING: Contribution to journal › SCORING: Journal article › Research › peer-review

Harvard

Bodart, L, Hanken, H, Smeets, R , Gosau, M, Li, C, Kluwe, L & Klatt, J 2020, 'Assessing the frequency of deep lingual concavities in 826 posterior mandible sockets', J CRANIO MAXILL SURG, vol. 48, no. 11, pp. 1045-1051. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcms.2020.09.001

APA

Bodart, L., Hanken, H., Smeets, R., Gosau, M., Li, C., Kluwe, L., & Klatt, J. (2020). Assessing the frequency of deep lingual concavities in 826 posterior mandible sockets. J CRANIO MAXILL SURG, 48(11), 1045-1051. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcms.2020.09.001

Vancouver

Bodart L, Hanken H, Smeets R , Gosau M, Li C, Kluwe L et al. Assessing the frequency of deep lingual concavities in 826 posterior mandible sockets. J CRANIO MAXILL SURG. 2020 Nov;48(11):1045-1051. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcms.2020.09.001

Bibtex

@article{df542c3a3cfa4b048331f7068f509ce3,

title = "Assessing the frequency of deep lingual concavities in 826 posterior mandible sockets",

abstract = "PURPOSE: To evaluate the frequency of deep lingual concavities in the lower jaw, which can cause surgical complications while inserting dental implants.METHODS: Cross-sections of the mandible alveolar ridge at the edentulous sockets were obtained via cone-beam computed tomography. Measurements were carried out using the freeware 'IC Measure' and based on the basic definitions of a previous study.RESULTS: Most (767/826 = 93%) sockets had concavities of various degrees (30-90°), while 59 (7%) sockets had no concavity. However, the majority of the concavities (71%) were mild, with angles > 60°. The other 220 (26%) sockets had deeper concavities of <60°; among these, 12 (1%) had extremely deep concavities of <40°.CONCLUSIONS: Only a few cases have deep lingual concavities that pose a high risk for lingual plate perforation during dental implantation.",

keywords = "Cone-Beam Computed Tomography, Dental Implantation, Endosseous/adverse effects, Dental Implants, Humans, Mandible/diagnostic imaging, Mouth, Edentulous, Tongue, Tooth Socket",

author = "Linda Bodart and Henning Hanken and Ralf Smeets and Martin Gosau and Chenxi Li and Lan Kluwe and Jan Klatt",

year = "2020",

month = nov,

doi = "10.1016/j.jcms.2020.09.001",

language = "English",

volume = "48",

pages = "1045--1051",

journal = "J CRANIO MAXILL SURG",

issn = "1010-5182",

publisher = "Elsevier",

number = "11",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Assessing the frequency of deep lingual concavities in 826 posterior mandible sockets

AU - Bodart, Linda

AU - Hanken, Henning

AU - Smeets, Ralf

AU - Gosau, Martin

AU - Li, Chenxi

AU - Kluwe, Lan

AU - Klatt, Jan

PY - 2020/11

Y1 - 2020/11

N2 - PURPOSE: To evaluate the frequency of deep lingual concavities in the lower jaw, which can cause surgical complications while inserting dental implants.METHODS: Cross-sections of the mandible alveolar ridge at the edentulous sockets were obtained via cone-beam computed tomography. Measurements were carried out using the freeware 'IC Measure' and based on the basic definitions of a previous study.RESULTS: Most (767/826 = 93%) sockets had concavities of various degrees (30-90°), while 59 (7%) sockets had no concavity. However, the majority of the concavities (71%) were mild, with angles > 60°. The other 220 (26%) sockets had deeper concavities of <60°; among these, 12 (1%) had extremely deep concavities of <40°.CONCLUSIONS: Only a few cases have deep lingual concavities that pose a high risk for lingual plate perforation during dental implantation.

AB - PURPOSE: To evaluate the frequency of deep lingual concavities in the lower jaw, which can cause surgical complications while inserting dental implants.METHODS: Cross-sections of the mandible alveolar ridge at the edentulous sockets were obtained via cone-beam computed tomography. Measurements were carried out using the freeware 'IC Measure' and based on the basic definitions of a previous study.RESULTS: Most (767/826 = 93%) sockets had concavities of various degrees (30-90°), while 59 (7%) sockets had no concavity. However, the majority of the concavities (71%) were mild, with angles > 60°. The other 220 (26%) sockets had deeper concavities of <60°; among these, 12 (1%) had extremely deep concavities of <40°.CONCLUSIONS: Only a few cases have deep lingual concavities that pose a high risk for lingual plate perforation during dental implantation.

KW - Cone-Beam Computed Tomography

KW - Dental Implantation, Endosseous/adverse effects

KW - Dental Implants

KW - Humans

KW - Mandible/diagnostic imaging

KW - Mouth, Edentulous

KW - Tongue

KW - Tooth Socket

U2 - 10.1016/j.jcms.2020.09.001

DO - 10.1016/j.jcms.2020.09.001

M3 - SCORING: Journal article

C2 - 33012600

VL - 48

SP - 1045

EP - 1051

JO - J CRANIO MAXILL SURG

JF - J CRANIO MAXILL SURG

SN - 1010-5182

IS - 11

ER -