Ärztlich assistierter Suizid - zwei Perspektiven

Martin Scherer; Urban Wiesing

doi:10.1007/s15006-024-4062-5

Ärztlich assistierter Suizid - zwei Perspektiven

Standard

Ärztlich assistierter Suizid - zwei Perspektiven. / Scherer, Martin; Wiesing, Urban.

In: MMW Fortschr Med, Vol. 166, No. Suppl 5, 08.2024, p. 3-8.

Research output: SCORING: Contribution to journal › SCORING: Journal article › Research › peer-review

Harvard

Scherer, M & Wiesing, U 2024, 'Ärztlich assistierter Suizid - zwei Perspektiven', MMW Fortschr Med, vol. 166, no. Suppl 5, pp. 3-8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s15006-024-4062-5

APA

Scherer, M., & Wiesing, U. (2024). Ärztlich assistierter Suizid - zwei Perspektiven. MMW Fortschr Med, 166(Suppl 5), 3-8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s15006-024-4062-5

Vancouver

Scherer M, Wiesing U. Ärztlich assistierter Suizid - zwei Perspektiven. MMW Fortschr Med. 2024 Aug;166(Suppl 5):3-8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s15006-024-4062-5

Bibtex

@article{463af58c263d4018b0fbb62b49944add,

title = "{\"A}rztlich assistierter Suizid - zwei Perspektiven",

abstract = "In February 2020, the Federal Constitutional Court of Germany issued a landmark judgement on assisted suicide. It rejected as unconstitutional a law from 2015 that prohibited {"}assisted suicide services{"}. It emphasized the freedom of people to shape their own lives and deaths and to seek help in doing so. In contrast, other practical problems arise when a doctor is confronted with a request for assisted suicide at the bedside in the current situation. The different perspectives and their tensions are contrasted.",

keywords = "Suicide, Assisted/legislation & jurisprudence, Humans, Germany",

author = "Martin Scherer and Urban Wiesing",

note = "{\textcopyright} 2024. Springer Medizin Verlag GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature.",

year = "2024",

month = aug,

doi = "10.1007/s15006-024-4062-5",

language = "Deutsch",

volume = "166",

pages = "3--8",

journal = "MMW Fortschr Med",

issn = "1438-3276",

publisher = "Urban und Vogel",

number = "Suppl 5",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Ärztlich assistierter Suizid - zwei Perspektiven

AU - Scherer, Martin

AU - Wiesing, Urban

PY - 2024/8

Y1 - 2024/8

N2 - In February 2020, the Federal Constitutional Court of Germany issued a landmark judgement on assisted suicide. It rejected as unconstitutional a law from 2015 that prohibited "assisted suicide services". It emphasized the freedom of people to shape their own lives and deaths and to seek help in doing so. In contrast, other practical problems arise when a doctor is confronted with a request for assisted suicide at the bedside in the current situation. The different perspectives and their tensions are contrasted.

AB - In February 2020, the Federal Constitutional Court of Germany issued a landmark judgement on assisted suicide. It rejected as unconstitutional a law from 2015 that prohibited "assisted suicide services". It emphasized the freedom of people to shape their own lives and deaths and to seek help in doing so. In contrast, other practical problems arise when a doctor is confronted with a request for assisted suicide at the bedside in the current situation. The different perspectives and their tensions are contrasted.

KW - Suicide, Assisted/legislation & jurisprudence

KW - Humans

KW - Germany

U2 - 10.1007/s15006-024-4062-5

DO - 10.1007/s15006-024-4062-5

M3 - SCORING: Zeitschriftenaufsatz

C2 - 39112834

VL - 166

SP - 3

EP - 8

JO - MMW Fortschr Med

JF - MMW Fortschr Med

SN - 1438-3276

IS - Suppl 5

ER -