Are we wasting our time with the sentinel technique? Fifteen reasons to stop axilla dissection.

Standard

Are we wasting our time with the sentinel technique? Fifteen reasons to stop axilla dissection. / Engel, J; Lebeau, Annette; Sauer, H; Hölzel, D.

In: BREAST, Vol. 15, No. 3, 3, 2006, p. 452-455.

Research output: SCORING: Contribution to journalSCORING: Journal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{aa66875d190e463f92861fae72857925,
title = "Are we wasting our time with the sentinel technique? Fifteen reasons to stop axilla dissection.",
abstract = "Originally, surgery for breast cancer involved removing the pectoral muscles and the regional lymph nodes. This drastic technique was based on Halsted's paradigm of continuous tumour spread via the lymph nodes. In the last century, the amount of surgery has gradually decreased as breast cancer has been recognised as a primary systemic, or partially systemic, disease. Nowadays, breast-conserving therapy is widely used, but axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) and the sentinel technique are still common. Can the patient also be spared such axillary surgery? We have assembled convincing arguments against ALND (and therefore also against the sentinel technique) based on the probability that positive lymph nodes are unlikely to metastasise and that removing them is redundant. At least a discussion of this topic is more than overdue, even if it may be too early to change behaviour.",
author = "J Engel and Annette Lebeau and H Sauer and D H{\"o}lzel",
year = "2006",
language = "Deutsch",
volume = "15",
pages = "452--455",
journal = "BREAST",
issn = "0960-9776",
publisher = "Churchill Livingstone",
number = "3",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Are we wasting our time with the sentinel technique? Fifteen reasons to stop axilla dissection.

AU - Engel, J

AU - Lebeau, Annette

AU - Sauer, H

AU - Hölzel, D

PY - 2006

Y1 - 2006

N2 - Originally, surgery for breast cancer involved removing the pectoral muscles and the regional lymph nodes. This drastic technique was based on Halsted's paradigm of continuous tumour spread via the lymph nodes. In the last century, the amount of surgery has gradually decreased as breast cancer has been recognised as a primary systemic, or partially systemic, disease. Nowadays, breast-conserving therapy is widely used, but axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) and the sentinel technique are still common. Can the patient also be spared such axillary surgery? We have assembled convincing arguments against ALND (and therefore also against the sentinel technique) based on the probability that positive lymph nodes are unlikely to metastasise and that removing them is redundant. At least a discussion of this topic is more than overdue, even if it may be too early to change behaviour.

AB - Originally, surgery for breast cancer involved removing the pectoral muscles and the regional lymph nodes. This drastic technique was based on Halsted's paradigm of continuous tumour spread via the lymph nodes. In the last century, the amount of surgery has gradually decreased as breast cancer has been recognised as a primary systemic, or partially systemic, disease. Nowadays, breast-conserving therapy is widely used, but axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) and the sentinel technique are still common. Can the patient also be spared such axillary surgery? We have assembled convincing arguments against ALND (and therefore also against the sentinel technique) based on the probability that positive lymph nodes are unlikely to metastasise and that removing them is redundant. At least a discussion of this topic is more than overdue, even if it may be too early to change behaviour.

M3 - SCORING: Zeitschriftenaufsatz

VL - 15

SP - 452

EP - 455

JO - BREAST

JF - BREAST

SN - 0960-9776

IS - 3

M1 - 3

ER -