Aortic Valve Repair in Annular Dilatation: External vs Internal Suture Annuloplasty

Standard

Aortic Valve Repair in Annular Dilatation: External vs Internal Suture Annuloplasty. / Holst, Theresa; Petersen, Johannes; Sinning, Christoph; Reichenspurner, Hermann; Girdauskas, Evaldas.

In: ANN THORAC SURG, Vol. 113, No. 6, 06.2022, p. 2036-2044.

Research output: SCORING: Contribution to journalSCORING: Journal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{a3a56edb6b81433195556deb2f14a76f,
title = "Aortic Valve Repair in Annular Dilatation: External vs Internal Suture Annuloplasty",
abstract = "BACKGROUND: Annuloplasty is essential in aortic valve repair. The most appropriate technique is highly controversial, however. We aimed to evaluate changes in postoperative annulus diameter on serial echocardiography after external and internal suture annuloplasty.METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed serial transthoracic echocardiography of consecutive patients from our institutional aortic valve repair registry who had received suture annuloplasty. Midsystolic annulus diameter was measured on parasternal long-axis view preoperatively, at discharge, 3-6 months, and at 1, 2 and 3 years postoperatively. Primary endpoint was the prevalence of annulus redilatation. Secondary endpoints were the correlation between annulus redilatation and (1) external vs internal technique and (2) reoccurrence of aortic insufficiency ≥2.RESULTS: A total of 70 patients (mean ± SD age: 43 ± 13 years, 91% male) underwent aortic valve repair including external (n = 27) or internal (n = 43) suture annuloplasty between February 2016 and November 2019. Mean follow-up was 17 ± 11 (range: 3-50) months. Mean preoperative annulus diameter of 29.7 ± 2.8 (23.8-37.8) mm was significantly reduced to 22.7 ± 2.9 (16.7-31.7) mm, P < .001 at discharge and increased to 23.8 ± 2.3 (20.9-27.0) mm, P = .037 during follow-up. The mild increase in postoperative annulus diameter did not correlate with the reoccurrence of aortic insufficiency ≥2. Preoperative annulus was significantly larger in the external group (external: 30.6 ± 3.2 mm; internal: 29.1 ± 2.5 mm; P = .032). However, we found no significant difference in postoperative annulus increase rate between both techniques.CONCLUSIONS: Although mild, a significant continuous increase of annulus diameter after suture annuloplasty was seen, which did not correlate with the reoccurrence of aortic insufficiency ≥2 at mid-term follow-up. Annulus redilatation was comparable between external and internal technique.",
author = "Theresa Holst and Johannes Petersen and Christoph Sinning and Hermann Reichenspurner and Evaldas Girdauskas",
note = "Copyright {\textcopyright} 2021 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.",
year = "2022",
month = jun,
doi = "10.1016/j.athoracsur.2021.06.021",
language = "English",
volume = "113",
pages = "2036--2044",
journal = "ANN THORAC SURG",
issn = "0003-4975",
publisher = "Elsevier USA",
number = "6",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Aortic Valve Repair in Annular Dilatation: External vs Internal Suture Annuloplasty

AU - Holst, Theresa

AU - Petersen, Johannes

AU - Sinning, Christoph

AU - Reichenspurner, Hermann

AU - Girdauskas, Evaldas

N1 - Copyright © 2021 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

PY - 2022/6

Y1 - 2022/6

N2 - BACKGROUND: Annuloplasty is essential in aortic valve repair. The most appropriate technique is highly controversial, however. We aimed to evaluate changes in postoperative annulus diameter on serial echocardiography after external and internal suture annuloplasty.METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed serial transthoracic echocardiography of consecutive patients from our institutional aortic valve repair registry who had received suture annuloplasty. Midsystolic annulus diameter was measured on parasternal long-axis view preoperatively, at discharge, 3-6 months, and at 1, 2 and 3 years postoperatively. Primary endpoint was the prevalence of annulus redilatation. Secondary endpoints were the correlation between annulus redilatation and (1) external vs internal technique and (2) reoccurrence of aortic insufficiency ≥2.RESULTS: A total of 70 patients (mean ± SD age: 43 ± 13 years, 91% male) underwent aortic valve repair including external (n = 27) or internal (n = 43) suture annuloplasty between February 2016 and November 2019. Mean follow-up was 17 ± 11 (range: 3-50) months. Mean preoperative annulus diameter of 29.7 ± 2.8 (23.8-37.8) mm was significantly reduced to 22.7 ± 2.9 (16.7-31.7) mm, P < .001 at discharge and increased to 23.8 ± 2.3 (20.9-27.0) mm, P = .037 during follow-up. The mild increase in postoperative annulus diameter did not correlate with the reoccurrence of aortic insufficiency ≥2. Preoperative annulus was significantly larger in the external group (external: 30.6 ± 3.2 mm; internal: 29.1 ± 2.5 mm; P = .032). However, we found no significant difference in postoperative annulus increase rate between both techniques.CONCLUSIONS: Although mild, a significant continuous increase of annulus diameter after suture annuloplasty was seen, which did not correlate with the reoccurrence of aortic insufficiency ≥2 at mid-term follow-up. Annulus redilatation was comparable between external and internal technique.

AB - BACKGROUND: Annuloplasty is essential in aortic valve repair. The most appropriate technique is highly controversial, however. We aimed to evaluate changes in postoperative annulus diameter on serial echocardiography after external and internal suture annuloplasty.METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed serial transthoracic echocardiography of consecutive patients from our institutional aortic valve repair registry who had received suture annuloplasty. Midsystolic annulus diameter was measured on parasternal long-axis view preoperatively, at discharge, 3-6 months, and at 1, 2 and 3 years postoperatively. Primary endpoint was the prevalence of annulus redilatation. Secondary endpoints were the correlation between annulus redilatation and (1) external vs internal technique and (2) reoccurrence of aortic insufficiency ≥2.RESULTS: A total of 70 patients (mean ± SD age: 43 ± 13 years, 91% male) underwent aortic valve repair including external (n = 27) or internal (n = 43) suture annuloplasty between February 2016 and November 2019. Mean follow-up was 17 ± 11 (range: 3-50) months. Mean preoperative annulus diameter of 29.7 ± 2.8 (23.8-37.8) mm was significantly reduced to 22.7 ± 2.9 (16.7-31.7) mm, P < .001 at discharge and increased to 23.8 ± 2.3 (20.9-27.0) mm, P = .037 during follow-up. The mild increase in postoperative annulus diameter did not correlate with the reoccurrence of aortic insufficiency ≥2. Preoperative annulus was significantly larger in the external group (external: 30.6 ± 3.2 mm; internal: 29.1 ± 2.5 mm; P = .032). However, we found no significant difference in postoperative annulus increase rate between both techniques.CONCLUSIONS: Although mild, a significant continuous increase of annulus diameter after suture annuloplasty was seen, which did not correlate with the reoccurrence of aortic insufficiency ≥2 at mid-term follow-up. Annulus redilatation was comparable between external and internal technique.

U2 - 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2021.06.021

DO - 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2021.06.021

M3 - SCORING: Journal article

C2 - 34237289

VL - 113

SP - 2036

EP - 2044

JO - ANN THORAC SURG

JF - ANN THORAC SURG

SN - 0003-4975

IS - 6

ER -