Analog receive signal processing for magnetic particle imaging

Standard

Analog receive signal processing for magnetic particle imaging. / Graeser, Matthias; Knopp, Tobias; Grüttner, Mandy; Sattel, Timo F; Buzug, Thorsten M.

In: MED PHYS, Vol. 40, No. 4, 04.2013, p. 042303.

Research output: SCORING: Contribution to journalSCORING: Journal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Graeser, M, Knopp, T, Grüttner, M, Sattel, TF & Buzug, TM 2013, 'Analog receive signal processing for magnetic particle imaging', MED PHYS, vol. 40, no. 4, pp. 042303. https://doi.org/10.1118/1.4794482

APA

Graeser, M., Knopp, T., Grüttner, M., Sattel, T. F., & Buzug, T. M. (2013). Analog receive signal processing for magnetic particle imaging. MED PHYS, 40(4), 042303. https://doi.org/10.1118/1.4794482

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{3e2ccd9e049e4a44b11cd73c03c08e5f,
title = "Analog receive signal processing for magnetic particle imaging",
abstract = "PURPOSE: Magnetic particle imaging (MPI) applies oscillating magnetic fields to determine the distribution of magnetic nanoparticles in vivo. Using a receive coil, the change of the particle magnetization can be detected. However, the signal induced by the nanoparticles is superimposed by the direct feedthrough interference of the sinusoidal excitation field, which couples into the receive coils. As the latter is several magnitudes higher, the extraction of the particle signal from the excitation signal is a challenging task.METHODS: One way to remove the interfering signal is to suppress the excitation signal by means of a band-stop filter. However, this technique removes parts of the desired particle signal, which are essential for direct reconstruction of the particle concentration. A way to recover the entire particle signal is to cancel out the excitation signal by coupling a matching cancellation signal into the receive chain. However, the suppression rates that can be achieved by signal cancellation are not as high as with the filtering method, which limits the sensitivity of this method. In order to unite the advantages of both methods, in this work the authors propose to combine the filtering and the cancellation technique. All methods were compared by measuring 10 μl Resovist, in the same field generator only switching the signal processing parts.RESULTS: The reconstructed time signals of the three methods, show the advantage of the proposed combination of filtering and cancellation. The method preserves the fundamental frequency and is able to detect the tracer signal at its full bandwidth even for low concentrations.CONCLUSIONS: By recovering the full particle signal the SNR can be improved and errors in the x-space reconstruction are prevented. The authors show that the combined method provides this full particle signal and makes it possible to improve image quality.",
keywords = "Algorithms, Analog-Digital Conversion, Dextrans, Image Enhancement, Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Magnetite Nanoparticles, Reproducibility of Results, Sensitivity and Specificity, Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted, Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't",
author = "Matthias Graeser and Tobias Knopp and Mandy Gr{\"u}ttner and Sattel, {Timo F} and Buzug, {Thorsten M}",
year = "2013",
month = apr,
doi = "10.1118/1.4794482",
language = "English",
volume = "40",
pages = "042303",
journal = "MED PHYS",
issn = "0094-2405",
publisher = "AAPM - American Association of Physicists in Medicine",
number = "4",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Analog receive signal processing for magnetic particle imaging

AU - Graeser, Matthias

AU - Knopp, Tobias

AU - Grüttner, Mandy

AU - Sattel, Timo F

AU - Buzug, Thorsten M

PY - 2013/4

Y1 - 2013/4

N2 - PURPOSE: Magnetic particle imaging (MPI) applies oscillating magnetic fields to determine the distribution of magnetic nanoparticles in vivo. Using a receive coil, the change of the particle magnetization can be detected. However, the signal induced by the nanoparticles is superimposed by the direct feedthrough interference of the sinusoidal excitation field, which couples into the receive coils. As the latter is several magnitudes higher, the extraction of the particle signal from the excitation signal is a challenging task.METHODS: One way to remove the interfering signal is to suppress the excitation signal by means of a band-stop filter. However, this technique removes parts of the desired particle signal, which are essential for direct reconstruction of the particle concentration. A way to recover the entire particle signal is to cancel out the excitation signal by coupling a matching cancellation signal into the receive chain. However, the suppression rates that can be achieved by signal cancellation are not as high as with the filtering method, which limits the sensitivity of this method. In order to unite the advantages of both methods, in this work the authors propose to combine the filtering and the cancellation technique. All methods were compared by measuring 10 μl Resovist, in the same field generator only switching the signal processing parts.RESULTS: The reconstructed time signals of the three methods, show the advantage of the proposed combination of filtering and cancellation. The method preserves the fundamental frequency and is able to detect the tracer signal at its full bandwidth even for low concentrations.CONCLUSIONS: By recovering the full particle signal the SNR can be improved and errors in the x-space reconstruction are prevented. The authors show that the combined method provides this full particle signal and makes it possible to improve image quality.

AB - PURPOSE: Magnetic particle imaging (MPI) applies oscillating magnetic fields to determine the distribution of magnetic nanoparticles in vivo. Using a receive coil, the change of the particle magnetization can be detected. However, the signal induced by the nanoparticles is superimposed by the direct feedthrough interference of the sinusoidal excitation field, which couples into the receive coils. As the latter is several magnitudes higher, the extraction of the particle signal from the excitation signal is a challenging task.METHODS: One way to remove the interfering signal is to suppress the excitation signal by means of a band-stop filter. However, this technique removes parts of the desired particle signal, which are essential for direct reconstruction of the particle concentration. A way to recover the entire particle signal is to cancel out the excitation signal by coupling a matching cancellation signal into the receive chain. However, the suppression rates that can be achieved by signal cancellation are not as high as with the filtering method, which limits the sensitivity of this method. In order to unite the advantages of both methods, in this work the authors propose to combine the filtering and the cancellation technique. All methods were compared by measuring 10 μl Resovist, in the same field generator only switching the signal processing parts.RESULTS: The reconstructed time signals of the three methods, show the advantage of the proposed combination of filtering and cancellation. The method preserves the fundamental frequency and is able to detect the tracer signal at its full bandwidth even for low concentrations.CONCLUSIONS: By recovering the full particle signal the SNR can be improved and errors in the x-space reconstruction are prevented. The authors show that the combined method provides this full particle signal and makes it possible to improve image quality.

KW - Algorithms

KW - Analog-Digital Conversion

KW - Dextrans

KW - Image Enhancement

KW - Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted

KW - Magnetic Resonance Imaging

KW - Magnetite Nanoparticles

KW - Reproducibility of Results

KW - Sensitivity and Specificity

KW - Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted

KW - Journal Article

KW - Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

U2 - 10.1118/1.4794482

DO - 10.1118/1.4794482

M3 - SCORING: Journal article

C2 - 23556916

VL - 40

SP - 042303

JO - MED PHYS

JF - MED PHYS

SN - 0094-2405

IS - 4

ER -