Research ExplorerPublicationsAktuarische Auswertung von Zeit-Ereignis-Daten und ihre Bede...

Aktuarische Auswertung von Zeit-Ereignis-Daten und ihre Bedeutung bei der Beurteilung von Resultaten. Qualitätsanalyse der Zeitschrift "Strahlentherapie und Onkologie"

Standard

Aktuarische Auswertung von Zeit-Ereignis-Daten und ihre Bedeutung bei der Beurteilung von Resultaten. Qualitätsanalyse der Zeitschrift "Strahlentherapie und Onkologie". / Dubben, H H; Beck-Bornholdt, H P.

In: STRAHLENTHER ONKOL, Vol. 176, No. 12, 01.12.2000, p. 547-54.

Research output: SCORING: Contribution to journal › SCORING: Journal article › Research › peer-review

Harvard

Dubben, HH & Beck-Bornholdt, HP 2000, 'Aktuarische Auswertung von Zeit-Ereignis-Daten und ihre Bedeutung bei der Beurteilung von Resultaten. Qualitätsanalyse der Zeitschrift "Strahlentherapie und Onkologie"', STRAHLENTHER ONKOL, vol. 176, no. 12, pp. 547-54.

APA

Dubben, H. H., & Beck-Bornholdt, H. P. (2000). Aktuarische Auswertung von Zeit-Ereignis-Daten und ihre Bedeutung bei der Beurteilung von Resultaten. Qualitätsanalyse der Zeitschrift "Strahlentherapie und Onkologie". STRAHLENTHER ONKOL, 176(12), 547-54.

Vancouver

Dubben HH, Beck-Bornholdt HP. Aktuarische Auswertung von Zeit-Ereignis-Daten und ihre Bedeutung bei der Beurteilung von Resultaten. Qualitätsanalyse der Zeitschrift "Strahlentherapie und Onkologie". STRAHLENTHER ONKOL. 2000 Dec 1;176(12):547-54.

Bibtex

@article{e103cce65a304b22ae5ec6c009e54e28,
title = "Aktuarische Auswertung von Zeit-Ereignis-Daten und ihre Bedeutung bei der Beurteilung von Resultaten. Qualit{\"a}tsanalyse der Zeitschrift {"}Strahlentherapie und Onkologie{"}",
abstract = "BACKGROUND: The statistical quality of the contributions to {"}Strahlentherapie und Onkologie{"} is assessed, aiming for improvement of the journal and consequently its impact factor.MATERIAL AND METHODS: All 181 articles published during 1998 and 1999 in the categories {"}review{"}, {"}original contribution{"}, and {"}short communication{"} were analyzed concerning actuarial analysis of time-failure data.RESULT: One hundred and twenty-three publications without time-failure data were excluded from analysis. Forty-five of the remaining 58 publications with time-failure data were evaluated actuarially. This corresponds to 78% (95% confidence interval: 64 to 88%) of papers, in which data were adequately analyzed. Complications were reported in 16 of 58 papers, but in only 3 cases actuarially. The number of patients at risk during the course of follow-up was documented adequately in 22 of the 45 publications with actuarial analysis.CONCLUSION: Authors, peer reviewers, and editors could contribute to improve the quality of the journal by setting value on acturial analysis of time-failure data.",
keywords = "Actuarial Analysis, Biometry, Confidence Intervals, Germany, Humans, Medical Oncology, Neoplasms, Periodicals as Topic, Radiotherapy, Research, Time Factors, Treatment Failure",
author = "Dubben, {H H} and Beck-Bornholdt, {H P}",
year = "2000",
month = dec,
day = "1",
language = "Deutsch",
volume = "176",
pages = "547--54",
journal = "STRAHLENTHER ONKOL",
issn = "0179-7158",
publisher = "Urban und Vogel",
number = "12",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Aktuarische Auswertung von Zeit-Ereignis-Daten und ihre Bedeutung bei der Beurteilung von Resultaten. Qualitätsanalyse der Zeitschrift "Strahlentherapie und Onkologie"

AU - Dubben, H H

AU - Beck-Bornholdt, H P

PY - 2000/12/1

Y1 - 2000/12/1

N2 - BACKGROUND: The statistical quality of the contributions to "Strahlentherapie und Onkologie" is assessed, aiming for improvement of the journal and consequently its impact factor.MATERIAL AND METHODS: All 181 articles published during 1998 and 1999 in the categories "review", "original contribution", and "short communication" were analyzed concerning actuarial analysis of time-failure data.RESULT: One hundred and twenty-three publications without time-failure data were excluded from analysis. Forty-five of the remaining 58 publications with time-failure data were evaluated actuarially. This corresponds to 78% (95% confidence interval: 64 to 88%) of papers, in which data were adequately analyzed. Complications were reported in 16 of 58 papers, but in only 3 cases actuarially. The number of patients at risk during the course of follow-up was documented adequately in 22 of the 45 publications with actuarial analysis.CONCLUSION: Authors, peer reviewers, and editors could contribute to improve the quality of the journal by setting value on acturial analysis of time-failure data.

AB - BACKGROUND: The statistical quality of the contributions to "Strahlentherapie und Onkologie" is assessed, aiming for improvement of the journal and consequently its impact factor.MATERIAL AND METHODS: All 181 articles published during 1998 and 1999 in the categories "review", "original contribution", and "short communication" were analyzed concerning actuarial analysis of time-failure data.RESULT: One hundred and twenty-three publications without time-failure data were excluded from analysis. Forty-five of the remaining 58 publications with time-failure data were evaluated actuarially. This corresponds to 78% (95% confidence interval: 64 to 88%) of papers, in which data were adequately analyzed. Complications were reported in 16 of 58 papers, but in only 3 cases actuarially. The number of patients at risk during the course of follow-up was documented adequately in 22 of the 45 publications with actuarial analysis.CONCLUSION: Authors, peer reviewers, and editors could contribute to improve the quality of the journal by setting value on acturial analysis of time-failure data.

KW - Actuarial Analysis

KW - Biometry

KW - Confidence Intervals

KW - Germany

KW - Humans

KW - Medical Oncology

KW - Neoplasms

KW - Periodicals as Topic

KW - Radiotherapy

KW - Research

KW - Time Factors

KW - Treatment Failure

M3 - SCORING: Zeitschriftenaufsatz

C2 - 11140148

VL - 176

SP - 547

EP - 554

JO - STRAHLENTHER ONKOL

JF - STRAHLENTHER ONKOL

SN - 0179-7158

IS - 12

ER -