Advantages of cone beam computed tomography for evaluation of subchondral insufficiency fractures of the knee compared to MRI

TY - JOUR

T1 - Advantages of cone beam computed tomography for evaluation of subchondral insufficiency fractures of the knee compared to MRI

AU - Delsmann, Maximilian M

AU - Delsmann, Julian

AU - Jandl, Nico Maximilian

AU - Maas, Kai-Jonathan

AU - Beil, Frank Timo

AU - Amling, Michael

AU - Henes, Frank Oliver

AU - Rolvien, Tim

AU - Spink, Clemens

N1 - © 2024. The Author(s).

PY - 2024/7/3

Y1 - 2024/7/3

N2 - To determine the diagnostic yield of cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) compared with 3 T magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for the evaluation of subchondral insufficiency fractures of the knee. Consecutive patients with subchondral insufficiency fractures of the knee examined by 3 T MRI and CBCT of the femoral condyles were reviewed. Two experienced raters graded the lesion severity on 3 T MRI and CBCT images: grade 1: no signs of a subchondral bone lesion; grade 2: subchondral trabecular fracture or cystic changes, but without infraction of the subchondral bone plate; grade 3: collapse of the subchondral bone plate. Ratings were repeated after six weeks to determine reliability. In addition, the bone lesion size was measured as elliptical area (mm2) and compared between CBCT and T1-weighted MRI sequences. Among 30 patients included (43.3% women; mean age: 60.9 ± 12.8 years; body mass index (BMI) 29.0 ± 12.8 kg/m2), the medial femoral condyle was affected in 21/30 patients (70%). The grading of subchondral lesions between MRI and CBCT did not match in 12 cases (40%). Based on MRI images, an underestimation (i.e., undergrading) compared with CBCT was observed in nine cases (30%), whereas overgrading occurred in three cases (10%). Compared to CBCT, routine T1-weighted 3 T sequences significantly overestimated osseus defect zones in sagittal (84.7 ± 68.9 mm2 vs. 35.9 ± 38.2 mm2, p < 0.01, Cohen's d = 1.14) and coronal orientation (53.1 ± 24.0 mm2 vs. 22.0 ± 15.2 mm2, p < 0.01, Cohen's d = 1.23). The reproducibility of the grading determined by intra- and inter-rater agreement was very high in MRI (intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) 0.78 and 0.90, respectively) and CBCT (ICC 0.96 and 0.96, respectively). In patients with subchondral insufficiency fractures of the knee, the use of CBCT revealed discrepancies in lesion grading compared with MRI. These findings are clinically relevant, as precise determination of subchondral bone plate integrity may influence the decision about conservative or surgical treatment. CBCT represents our imaging modality of choice for grading the lesion and assessing subchondral bone plate integrity. MRI remains the gold standard modality to detect especially early stages.

AB - To determine the diagnostic yield of cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) compared with 3 T magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for the evaluation of subchondral insufficiency fractures of the knee. Consecutive patients with subchondral insufficiency fractures of the knee examined by 3 T MRI and CBCT of the femoral condyles were reviewed. Two experienced raters graded the lesion severity on 3 T MRI and CBCT images: grade 1: no signs of a subchondral bone lesion; grade 2: subchondral trabecular fracture or cystic changes, but without infraction of the subchondral bone plate; grade 3: collapse of the subchondral bone plate. Ratings were repeated after six weeks to determine reliability. In addition, the bone lesion size was measured as elliptical area (mm2) and compared between CBCT and T1-weighted MRI sequences. Among 30 patients included (43.3% women; mean age: 60.9 ± 12.8 years; body mass index (BMI) 29.0 ± 12.8 kg/m2), the medial femoral condyle was affected in 21/30 patients (70%). The grading of subchondral lesions between MRI and CBCT did not match in 12 cases (40%). Based on MRI images, an underestimation (i.e., undergrading) compared with CBCT was observed in nine cases (30%), whereas overgrading occurred in three cases (10%). Compared to CBCT, routine T1-weighted 3 T sequences significantly overestimated osseus defect zones in sagittal (84.7 ± 68.9 mm2 vs. 35.9 ± 38.2 mm2, p < 0.01, Cohen's d = 1.14) and coronal orientation (53.1 ± 24.0 mm2 vs. 22.0 ± 15.2 mm2, p < 0.01, Cohen's d = 1.23). The reproducibility of the grading determined by intra- and inter-rater agreement was very high in MRI (intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) 0.78 and 0.90, respectively) and CBCT (ICC 0.96 and 0.96, respectively). In patients with subchondral insufficiency fractures of the knee, the use of CBCT revealed discrepancies in lesion grading compared with MRI. These findings are clinically relevant, as precise determination of subchondral bone plate integrity may influence the decision about conservative or surgical treatment. CBCT represents our imaging modality of choice for grading the lesion and assessing subchondral bone plate integrity. MRI remains the gold standard modality to detect especially early stages.

KW - Humans

KW - Cone-Beam Computed Tomography/methods

KW - Female

KW - Male

KW - Magnetic Resonance Imaging/methods

KW - Middle Aged

KW - Aged

KW - Fractures, Stress/diagnostic imaging

KW - Knee Joint/diagnostic imaging

KW - Reproducibility of Results

U2 - 10.1038/s41598-024-64591-7

DO - 10.1038/s41598-024-64591-7

M3 - SCORING: Journal article

C2 - 38961162

VL - 14

SP - 15278

JO - SCI REP-UK

JF - SCI REP-UK

SN - 2045-2322

IS - 1

ER -