Adjuvant radiotherapy after radical prostatectomy shows no ability to improve rates of overall and cancer-specific survival in a matched case-control study.

Standard

Adjuvant radiotherapy after radical prostatectomy shows no ability to improve rates of overall and cancer-specific survival in a matched case-control study. / Porter, Christopher R; Capitanio, Umberto; Perrotte, Paul; Walz, Jochen; Isbarn, Hendrik; Kodama, Koichi; Gibbons, Robert P; Correa, Roy; Karakiewicz, Pierre I.

In: BJU INT, Vol. 103, No. 5, 5, 2009, p. 597-602.

Research output: SCORING: Contribution to journalSCORING: Journal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Porter, CR, Capitanio, U, Perrotte, P, Walz, J, Isbarn, H, Kodama, K, Gibbons, RP, Correa, R & Karakiewicz, PI 2009, 'Adjuvant radiotherapy after radical prostatectomy shows no ability to improve rates of overall and cancer-specific survival in a matched case-control study.', BJU INT, vol. 103, no. 5, 5, pp. 597-602. <http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19021603?dopt=Citation>

APA

Porter, C. R., Capitanio, U., Perrotte, P., Walz, J., Isbarn, H., Kodama, K., Gibbons, R. P., Correa, R., & Karakiewicz, P. I. (2009). Adjuvant radiotherapy after radical prostatectomy shows no ability to improve rates of overall and cancer-specific survival in a matched case-control study. BJU INT, 103(5), 597-602. [5]. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19021603?dopt=Citation

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{b082e10c98da4f769769f51a8fc5cef4,
title = "Adjuvant radiotherapy after radical prostatectomy shows no ability to improve rates of overall and cancer-specific survival in a matched case-control study.",
abstract = "OBJECTIVE: To assess the effect of adjuvant radiotherapy (aRT) on the rate of cancer-specific and overall survival after radical prostatectomy (RP) in a group of patients with a long-term follow-up, as there is controversy about the benefit of aRT after RP for prostate cancer when endpoints beyond biochemical and local recurrence are considered. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Within a study cohort of 752 patients treated with RP, 118 (15.7%) received aRT; these patients were matched with controls who did not receive aRT after RP. Exact matches were made for pT stage, RP Gleason sum, surgical margin status, age (+/-10 years), year of surgery (+/-10 years) and delivery of hormonal therapy. Kaplan-Meier and life-table analyses were used to assess overall and cancer-specific survival RESULTS: The median (range) follow-up was 11.4 (0.1-41) years. The 10- and 20-year overall survival after RP in those with no aRT were, respectively, 81.1% and 44.8%, vs 75.5% and 40.0% in the aRT group (P = 0.1). The corresponding probabilities for cause-specific survival were, respectively, 97.3% and 89.0% vs 86.3% and 69.3% (P <0.001). There was no statistically significant difference in the overall and cause-specific survival between the groups after matching (hazard ratio 0.9, log rank P = 0.6; and 2.1, log rank P = 0.1, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Our analysis showed that, in a matched case-control study, aRT has no effect on overall and cancer-specific survival. Further randomized long-term studies are necessary to confirm these results.",
author = "Porter, {Christopher R} and Umberto Capitanio and Paul Perrotte and Jochen Walz and Hendrik Isbarn and Koichi Kodama and Gibbons, {Robert P} and Roy Correa and Karakiewicz, {Pierre I}",
year = "2009",
language = "Deutsch",
volume = "103",
pages = "597--602",
journal = "BJU INT",
issn = "1464-4096",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "5",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Adjuvant radiotherapy after radical prostatectomy shows no ability to improve rates of overall and cancer-specific survival in a matched case-control study.

AU - Porter, Christopher R

AU - Capitanio, Umberto

AU - Perrotte, Paul

AU - Walz, Jochen

AU - Isbarn, Hendrik

AU - Kodama, Koichi

AU - Gibbons, Robert P

AU - Correa, Roy

AU - Karakiewicz, Pierre I

PY - 2009

Y1 - 2009

N2 - OBJECTIVE: To assess the effect of adjuvant radiotherapy (aRT) on the rate of cancer-specific and overall survival after radical prostatectomy (RP) in a group of patients with a long-term follow-up, as there is controversy about the benefit of aRT after RP for prostate cancer when endpoints beyond biochemical and local recurrence are considered. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Within a study cohort of 752 patients treated with RP, 118 (15.7%) received aRT; these patients were matched with controls who did not receive aRT after RP. Exact matches were made for pT stage, RP Gleason sum, surgical margin status, age (+/-10 years), year of surgery (+/-10 years) and delivery of hormonal therapy. Kaplan-Meier and life-table analyses were used to assess overall and cancer-specific survival RESULTS: The median (range) follow-up was 11.4 (0.1-41) years. The 10- and 20-year overall survival after RP in those with no aRT were, respectively, 81.1% and 44.8%, vs 75.5% and 40.0% in the aRT group (P = 0.1). The corresponding probabilities for cause-specific survival were, respectively, 97.3% and 89.0% vs 86.3% and 69.3% (P <0.001). There was no statistically significant difference in the overall and cause-specific survival between the groups after matching (hazard ratio 0.9, log rank P = 0.6; and 2.1, log rank P = 0.1, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Our analysis showed that, in a matched case-control study, aRT has no effect on overall and cancer-specific survival. Further randomized long-term studies are necessary to confirm these results.

AB - OBJECTIVE: To assess the effect of adjuvant radiotherapy (aRT) on the rate of cancer-specific and overall survival after radical prostatectomy (RP) in a group of patients with a long-term follow-up, as there is controversy about the benefit of aRT after RP for prostate cancer when endpoints beyond biochemical and local recurrence are considered. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Within a study cohort of 752 patients treated with RP, 118 (15.7%) received aRT; these patients were matched with controls who did not receive aRT after RP. Exact matches were made for pT stage, RP Gleason sum, surgical margin status, age (+/-10 years), year of surgery (+/-10 years) and delivery of hormonal therapy. Kaplan-Meier and life-table analyses were used to assess overall and cancer-specific survival RESULTS: The median (range) follow-up was 11.4 (0.1-41) years. The 10- and 20-year overall survival after RP in those with no aRT were, respectively, 81.1% and 44.8%, vs 75.5% and 40.0% in the aRT group (P = 0.1). The corresponding probabilities for cause-specific survival were, respectively, 97.3% and 89.0% vs 86.3% and 69.3% (P <0.001). There was no statistically significant difference in the overall and cause-specific survival between the groups after matching (hazard ratio 0.9, log rank P = 0.6; and 2.1, log rank P = 0.1, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Our analysis showed that, in a matched case-control study, aRT has no effect on overall and cancer-specific survival. Further randomized long-term studies are necessary to confirm these results.

M3 - SCORING: Zeitschriftenaufsatz

VL - 103

SP - 597

EP - 602

JO - BJU INT

JF - BJU INT

SN - 1464-4096

IS - 5

M1 - 5

ER -