Additive Manufacturing for Guided Bone Regeneration: A Perspective for Alveolar Ridge Augmentation
Standard
Additive Manufacturing for Guided Bone Regeneration: A Perspective for Alveolar Ridge Augmentation. / Rider, Patrick; Kačarević, Željka Perić; Alkildani, Said; Retnasingh, Sujith; Schnettler, Reinhard; Barbeck, Mike.
In: INT J MOL SCI, Vol. 19, No. 11, 24.10.2018, p. 3308.Research output: SCORING: Contribution to journal › SCORING: Review article › Research
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Additive Manufacturing for Guided Bone Regeneration: A Perspective for Alveolar Ridge Augmentation
AU - Rider, Patrick
AU - Kačarević, Željka Perić
AU - Alkildani, Said
AU - Retnasingh, Sujith
AU - Schnettler, Reinhard
AU - Barbeck, Mike
PY - 2018/10/24
Y1 - 2018/10/24
N2 - Three-dimensional (3D) printing has become an important tool in the field of tissue engineering and its further development will lead to completely new clinical possibilities. The ability to create tissue scaffolds with controllable characteristics, such as internal architecture, porosity, and interconnectivity make it highly desirable in comparison to conventional techniques, which lack a defined structure and repeatability between scaffolds. Furthermore, 3D printing allows for the production of scaffolds with patient-specific dimensions using computer-aided design. The availability of commercially available 3D printed permanent implants is on the rise; however, there are yet to be any commercially available biodegradable/bioresorbable devices. This review will compare the main 3D printing techniques of: stereolithography; selective laser sintering; powder bed inkjet printing and extrusion printing; for the fabrication of biodegradable/bioresorbable bone tissue scaffolds; and, discuss their potential for dental applications, specifically augmentation of the alveolar ridge.
AB - Three-dimensional (3D) printing has become an important tool in the field of tissue engineering and its further development will lead to completely new clinical possibilities. The ability to create tissue scaffolds with controllable characteristics, such as internal architecture, porosity, and interconnectivity make it highly desirable in comparison to conventional techniques, which lack a defined structure and repeatability between scaffolds. Furthermore, 3D printing allows for the production of scaffolds with patient-specific dimensions using computer-aided design. The availability of commercially available 3D printed permanent implants is on the rise; however, there are yet to be any commercially available biodegradable/bioresorbable devices. This review will compare the main 3D printing techniques of: stereolithography; selective laser sintering; powder bed inkjet printing and extrusion printing; for the fabrication of biodegradable/bioresorbable bone tissue scaffolds; and, discuss their potential for dental applications, specifically augmentation of the alveolar ridge.
KW - Journal Article
KW - Review
U2 - 10.3390/ijms19113308
DO - 10.3390/ijms19113308
M3 - SCORING: Review article
C2 - 30355988
VL - 19
SP - 3308
JO - INT J MOL SCI
JF - INT J MOL SCI
SN - 1661-6596
IS - 11
ER -