Adapting the patient and physician versions of the 9-item shared decision making questionnaire for other healthcare providers in Japan
Standard
Adapting the patient and physician versions of the 9-item shared decision making questionnaire for other healthcare providers in Japan. / Goto, Yuko; Yamaguchi, Yasuhiro; Onishi, Joji; Arai, Hidenori; Härter, Martin; Scholl, Isabelle; Kriston, Levente; Miura, Hisayuki.
In: BMC MED INFORM DECIS, Vol. 21, No. 1, 314, 11.11.2021.Research output: SCORING: Contribution to journal › SCORING: Journal article › Research › peer-review
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Adapting the patient and physician versions of the 9-item shared decision making questionnaire for other healthcare providers in Japan
AU - Goto, Yuko
AU - Yamaguchi, Yasuhiro
AU - Onishi, Joji
AU - Arai, Hidenori
AU - Härter, Martin
AU - Scholl, Isabelle
AU - Kriston, Levente
AU - Miura, Hisayuki
N1 - © 2021. The Author(s).
PY - 2021/11/11
Y1 - 2021/11/11
N2 - BACKGROUND: In Japan, the number of older people with various health problems and difficulties in living is increasing. In order to practice patient-centered care for them, not only medical professionals but also multidisciplinary teams including care professionals and patients need to practice shared decision making (SDM) in the context of long-term care. For this reason, a measure of SDM in consultations with healthcare professionals (HCPs) other than physicians is needed. Therefore, this study aimed at adapting the patient and physician versions of the 9-item Shared Decision Making Questionnaire (SDM-Q-9, SDM-Q-Doc) for consultations with HCPs other than physicians in Japan.METHODS: A pair of SDM measures that can be used by HCPs other than physicians, "Care SDM-Questionnaire for care receivers (SDM-C-patient)" and "Care SDM-Questionnaire for care providers (SDM-C-provider)" were prepared based on the Japanese versions of the SDM-Q-9 and SDM-Q-Doc. The internal consistency and conceptual structure of these measures were tested by secondary analysis of data from 496 participants from a workshop on SDM for different HCPs. Measurement invariance were tested by multigroup confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) for the patient (SDM-C-patient and SDM-Q-9) and provider (SDM-C-provider vs. SDM-Q-Doc) versions.RESULTS: Both the Japanese SDM-C-patient and SDM-C-provider demonstrated high internal consistencies (Cronbach's α coefficient was 0.90 and McDonald's ω coefficient was 0.90 for both measures). CFA showed one-factor structures for both measures and original measures for physicians. Moreover, multigroup CFA showed configural and metric invariance between the novel care measures and original physician's measures.CONCLUSIONS: Thus, the novel SDM measures for care providers in Japan as well as the original physician's measures could be used in training setting. As these measures were tested only in a training setting, their reliability and validity as new measures for care should be tested in a clinical setting in future.
AB - BACKGROUND: In Japan, the number of older people with various health problems and difficulties in living is increasing. In order to practice patient-centered care for them, not only medical professionals but also multidisciplinary teams including care professionals and patients need to practice shared decision making (SDM) in the context of long-term care. For this reason, a measure of SDM in consultations with healthcare professionals (HCPs) other than physicians is needed. Therefore, this study aimed at adapting the patient and physician versions of the 9-item Shared Decision Making Questionnaire (SDM-Q-9, SDM-Q-Doc) for consultations with HCPs other than physicians in Japan.METHODS: A pair of SDM measures that can be used by HCPs other than physicians, "Care SDM-Questionnaire for care receivers (SDM-C-patient)" and "Care SDM-Questionnaire for care providers (SDM-C-provider)" were prepared based on the Japanese versions of the SDM-Q-9 and SDM-Q-Doc. The internal consistency and conceptual structure of these measures were tested by secondary analysis of data from 496 participants from a workshop on SDM for different HCPs. Measurement invariance were tested by multigroup confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) for the patient (SDM-C-patient and SDM-Q-9) and provider (SDM-C-provider vs. SDM-Q-Doc) versions.RESULTS: Both the Japanese SDM-C-patient and SDM-C-provider demonstrated high internal consistencies (Cronbach's α coefficient was 0.90 and McDonald's ω coefficient was 0.90 for both measures). CFA showed one-factor structures for both measures and original measures for physicians. Moreover, multigroup CFA showed configural and metric invariance between the novel care measures and original physician's measures.CONCLUSIONS: Thus, the novel SDM measures for care providers in Japan as well as the original physician's measures could be used in training setting. As these measures were tested only in a training setting, their reliability and validity as new measures for care should be tested in a clinical setting in future.
KW - Aged
KW - Decision Making, Shared
KW - Humans
KW - Japan
KW - Physicians
KW - Psychometrics
KW - Reproducibility of Results
KW - Surveys and Questionnaires
U2 - 10.1186/s12911-021-01683-8
DO - 10.1186/s12911-021-01683-8
M3 - SCORING: Journal article
C2 - 34763705
VL - 21
JO - BMC MED INFORM DECIS
JF - BMC MED INFORM DECIS
SN - 1472-6947
IS - 1
M1 - 314
ER -
