A prospective multicenter study of treosulfan in elderly patients with recurrent ovarian cancer: results of a planned safety analysis
Standard
A prospective multicenter study of treosulfan in elderly patients with recurrent ovarian cancer: results of a planned safety analysis. / Mahner, Sven; Oskay-Özcelik, Gülten; Heidrich-Lorsbach, Elke; Fuxius, Stefan; Sommer, Harald; Klare, Peter; Belau, Antje; Ruhmland, Birgit; Heuser, Thomas; Kölbl, Heinz; Markmann, Susanne; Sehouli, Jalid.
In: J CANCER RES CLIN, Vol. 138, No. 8, 01.08.2012, p. 1413-9.Research output: SCORING: Contribution to journal › SCORING: Journal article › Research › peer-review
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - A prospective multicenter study of treosulfan in elderly patients with recurrent ovarian cancer: results of a planned safety analysis
AU - Mahner, Sven
AU - Oskay-Özcelik, Gülten
AU - Heidrich-Lorsbach, Elke
AU - Fuxius, Stefan
AU - Sommer, Harald
AU - Klare, Peter
AU - Belau, Antje
AU - Ruhmland, Birgit
AU - Heuser, Thomas
AU - Kölbl, Heinz
AU - Markmann, Susanne
AU - Sehouli, Jalid
PY - 2012/8/1
Y1 - 2012/8/1
N2 - BACKGROUND: Treosulfan, an alkylating agent, has demonstrated activity in recurrent ovarian carcinoma. It is equieffective as oral (p.o.) and intravenous (i.v.) formulation. To explore the preference and compliance of elderly patients regarding p.o. or i.v. treosulfan for the treatment of relapsed ovarian carcinoma, women aged 65 years or older were included in this prospective multicenter study. Since elderly patients usually have several concomitant diseases and experience more treatment toxicity, an interim safety analysis was planned and performed after 25 patients finished therapy to assess the tolerability of the treatment regimens.METHODS: Patients had a free choice of treosulfan i.v. (7,000 mg/m(2) day 1 of a 28-day cycle) or p.o. (600 mg/m(2) day 1-28 of a 56-day cycle) for a maximum of 12 cycles (i.v.) or 12 months (p.o.). Indecisive patients were randomized. Toxicity was evaluated according to the NCI-CTC version 2.0.RESULTS: Twenty-five of 51 recruited patients completed therapy at the time of the planned interim analysis (median age, 75 years; range, 70-82). Median ECOG was 1, and median number of prior chemotherapy regimens was 2. A median number of 4 cycles (range, 1-12) were administered per patient. Anemia was the most common hematological toxicity (88 % of patients). Most frequent non-hematological toxicities were nausea (76 %), constipation (68 %), and fatigue (64 %).CONCLUSION: Treatment was generally well tolerated despite the fact that most patients suffered from multiple comorbidities and were heavily pretreated. There were no unexpected hematological or non-hematological toxicities. Based on this safety analysis, the next step of study recruitment was continued.
AB - BACKGROUND: Treosulfan, an alkylating agent, has demonstrated activity in recurrent ovarian carcinoma. It is equieffective as oral (p.o.) and intravenous (i.v.) formulation. To explore the preference and compliance of elderly patients regarding p.o. or i.v. treosulfan for the treatment of relapsed ovarian carcinoma, women aged 65 years or older were included in this prospective multicenter study. Since elderly patients usually have several concomitant diseases and experience more treatment toxicity, an interim safety analysis was planned and performed after 25 patients finished therapy to assess the tolerability of the treatment regimens.METHODS: Patients had a free choice of treosulfan i.v. (7,000 mg/m(2) day 1 of a 28-day cycle) or p.o. (600 mg/m(2) day 1-28 of a 56-day cycle) for a maximum of 12 cycles (i.v.) or 12 months (p.o.). Indecisive patients were randomized. Toxicity was evaluated according to the NCI-CTC version 2.0.RESULTS: Twenty-five of 51 recruited patients completed therapy at the time of the planned interim analysis (median age, 75 years; range, 70-82). Median ECOG was 1, and median number of prior chemotherapy regimens was 2. A median number of 4 cycles (range, 1-12) were administered per patient. Anemia was the most common hematological toxicity (88 % of patients). Most frequent non-hematological toxicities were nausea (76 %), constipation (68 %), and fatigue (64 %).CONCLUSION: Treatment was generally well tolerated despite the fact that most patients suffered from multiple comorbidities and were heavily pretreated. There were no unexpected hematological or non-hematological toxicities. Based on this safety analysis, the next step of study recruitment was continued.
KW - Aged
KW - Aged, 80 and over
KW - Alopecia
KW - Anemia
KW - Antineoplastic Agents, Alkylating
KW - Busulfan
KW - Constipation
KW - Drug Administration Schedule
KW - Fatigue
KW - Female
KW - Humans
KW - Leukopenia
KW - Neoplasm Recurrence, Local
KW - Neoplasm Staging
KW - Ovarian Neoplasms
KW - Prospective Studies
KW - Quality of Life
KW - Questionnaires
KW - Recurrence
KW - Treatment Outcome
U2 - 10.1007/s00432-012-1221-3
DO - 10.1007/s00432-012-1221-3
M3 - SCORING: Journal article
C2 - 22526159
VL - 138
SP - 1413
EP - 1419
JO - J CANCER RES CLIN
JF - J CANCER RES CLIN
SN - 0171-5216
IS - 8
ER -