A New Scoring Tool to Assess Overall Survival in Patients With Intracerebral Metastases From Gynecological Cancers

Standard

A New Scoring Tool to Assess Overall Survival in Patients With Intracerebral Metastases From Gynecological Cancers. / Rades, Dirk; Janssen, Stefan; Bajrovic, Amira; Veninga, Theo; Fischer, Dorothea; Schild, Steven E.

In: INT J GYNECOL CANCER, Vol. 27, No. 3, 03.2017, p. 597-602.

Research output: SCORING: Contribution to journalSCORING: Journal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{de695e03fd73428cb72e530649ac313d,
title = "A New Scoring Tool to Assess Overall Survival in Patients With Intracerebral Metastases From Gynecological Cancers",
abstract = "OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to facilitate individualized treatment strategies for intracerebral metastases from gynecological cancers by creating a specific overall survival (OS) score.METHODS/MATERIALS: Fifty-six patients irradiated for cerebral metastases from gynecological cancers were included. Eleven factors were retrospectively analyzed for OS: age, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance score, cancer type, histology, histologic grading, initial stage, number of lesions, extracerebral metastases, time between cancer diagnosis and brain metastases treatment, recursive partitioning analysis class, and type of treatment. Independent predictors of OS were incorporated in the score (better OS, 1 point; worse OS, 0 points).RESULTS: On Cox proportional hazards analysis, performance score (hazards ratio, 1.98; 95% confidence interval, 1.30-3.23; P = 0.001), no extracerebral metastases (3.34; 1.46-8.96; P = 0.003), and recursive partitioning analysis class 1 (3.27; 1.97-5.65; P < 0.001) were significant. The following points were assigned: ECOG score 1 to 2 = 1 point, ECOG score 3 to 4 = 0 points, no extracerebral metastases = 1 point, extracerebral metastases = 0 points. Sum scores were 0 (n = 32), 1 (n = 15), or 2 points (n = 9). Six-month OS rates were 6%, 67%, and 100%, respectively (P < 0.001).CONCLUSIONS: A predictive tool including 3 groups with significantly different OS probabilities was designed for patients with cerebral metastases from gynecological cancers. This tool will aid in choosing individual treatments.",
keywords = "Journal Article",
author = "Dirk Rades and Stefan Janssen and Amira Bajrovic and Theo Veninga and Dorothea Fischer and Schild, {Steven E}",
year = "2017",
month = mar,
doi = "10.1097/IGC.0000000000000899",
language = "English",
volume = "27",
pages = "597--602",
journal = "INT J GYNECOL CANCER",
issn = "1048-891X",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "3",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - A New Scoring Tool to Assess Overall Survival in Patients With Intracerebral Metastases From Gynecological Cancers

AU - Rades, Dirk

AU - Janssen, Stefan

AU - Bajrovic, Amira

AU - Veninga, Theo

AU - Fischer, Dorothea

AU - Schild, Steven E

PY - 2017/3

Y1 - 2017/3

N2 - OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to facilitate individualized treatment strategies for intracerebral metastases from gynecological cancers by creating a specific overall survival (OS) score.METHODS/MATERIALS: Fifty-six patients irradiated for cerebral metastases from gynecological cancers were included. Eleven factors were retrospectively analyzed for OS: age, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance score, cancer type, histology, histologic grading, initial stage, number of lesions, extracerebral metastases, time between cancer diagnosis and brain metastases treatment, recursive partitioning analysis class, and type of treatment. Independent predictors of OS were incorporated in the score (better OS, 1 point; worse OS, 0 points).RESULTS: On Cox proportional hazards analysis, performance score (hazards ratio, 1.98; 95% confidence interval, 1.30-3.23; P = 0.001), no extracerebral metastases (3.34; 1.46-8.96; P = 0.003), and recursive partitioning analysis class 1 (3.27; 1.97-5.65; P < 0.001) were significant. The following points were assigned: ECOG score 1 to 2 = 1 point, ECOG score 3 to 4 = 0 points, no extracerebral metastases = 1 point, extracerebral metastases = 0 points. Sum scores were 0 (n = 32), 1 (n = 15), or 2 points (n = 9). Six-month OS rates were 6%, 67%, and 100%, respectively (P < 0.001).CONCLUSIONS: A predictive tool including 3 groups with significantly different OS probabilities was designed for patients with cerebral metastases from gynecological cancers. This tool will aid in choosing individual treatments.

AB - OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to facilitate individualized treatment strategies for intracerebral metastases from gynecological cancers by creating a specific overall survival (OS) score.METHODS/MATERIALS: Fifty-six patients irradiated for cerebral metastases from gynecological cancers were included. Eleven factors were retrospectively analyzed for OS: age, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance score, cancer type, histology, histologic grading, initial stage, number of lesions, extracerebral metastases, time between cancer diagnosis and brain metastases treatment, recursive partitioning analysis class, and type of treatment. Independent predictors of OS were incorporated in the score (better OS, 1 point; worse OS, 0 points).RESULTS: On Cox proportional hazards analysis, performance score (hazards ratio, 1.98; 95% confidence interval, 1.30-3.23; P = 0.001), no extracerebral metastases (3.34; 1.46-8.96; P = 0.003), and recursive partitioning analysis class 1 (3.27; 1.97-5.65; P < 0.001) were significant. The following points were assigned: ECOG score 1 to 2 = 1 point, ECOG score 3 to 4 = 0 points, no extracerebral metastases = 1 point, extracerebral metastases = 0 points. Sum scores were 0 (n = 32), 1 (n = 15), or 2 points (n = 9). Six-month OS rates were 6%, 67%, and 100%, respectively (P < 0.001).CONCLUSIONS: A predictive tool including 3 groups with significantly different OS probabilities was designed for patients with cerebral metastases from gynecological cancers. This tool will aid in choosing individual treatments.

KW - Journal Article

U2 - 10.1097/IGC.0000000000000899

DO - 10.1097/IGC.0000000000000899

M3 - SCORING: Journal article

C2 - 28187091

VL - 27

SP - 597

EP - 602

JO - INT J GYNECOL CANCER

JF - INT J GYNECOL CANCER

SN - 1048-891X

IS - 3

ER -