A multimarker model to predict outcome in tamoxifen-treated breast cancer patients.

Standard

A multimarker model to predict outcome in tamoxifen-treated breast cancer patients. / Linke, Steven P; Bremer, Troy M; Herold, Christopher D; Sauter, Guido; Diamond, Cornelius.

In: CLIN CANCER RES, Vol. 12, No. 4, 4, 2006, p. 1175-1183.

Research output: SCORING: Contribution to journalSCORING: Journal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{2f8e11705e41439f89c204bf5a4dac79,
title = "A multimarker model to predict outcome in tamoxifen-treated breast cancer patients.",
abstract = "PURPOSE: This study was designed to produce a model to predict outcome in tamoxifen-treated breast cancer patients based on clinicopathologic features and multiple molecular markers. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: This was a retrospective study of 324 stage I to III female breast cancer patients treated with tamoxifen for whom standard clinicopathologic data and tumor tissue microarrays were available. Nine molecular markers were studied by semiquantitative immunohistochemistry and/or fluorescence in situ hybridization. Cox proportional hazards analysis was used to determine the contributions of each variable to disease-specific and overall survival, and machine learning was used to produce a model to predict patient outcome. RESULTS: On a univariate basis, the following features were significantly associated with worse survival: high pathologic tumor or nodal class, histologic grade, epidermal growth factor receptor, ERBB2, MYC, or TP53; absent estrogen receptor (ER) or progesterone receptor; and low BCL2. CCND1 and CDKN1B did not reach statistical significance. On a multivariate basis, nodal class, ER, and MYC were statistically significant as independent factors for survival. However, the benefit of ER-positive status was moderated by BCL2, ERBB2, and progesterone receptor. BCL2 and TP53 also interacted as an independent risk factor. A kernel partial least squares polynomial model was developed with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.90. CONCLUSIONS: Our data show the predictive value of BCL2, ERBB2, MYC, and TP53 in addition to the standard hormone receptors and clinicopathologic features, and they show the importance of conditional interpretation of certain molecular markers. Our multimarker predictive model performed significantly better than standard guidelines.",
author = "Linke, {Steven P} and Bremer, {Troy M} and Herold, {Christopher D} and Guido Sauter and Cornelius Diamond",
year = "2006",
language = "Deutsch",
volume = "12",
pages = "1175--1183",
journal = "CLIN CANCER RES",
issn = "1078-0432",
publisher = "American Association for Cancer Research Inc.",
number = "4",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - A multimarker model to predict outcome in tamoxifen-treated breast cancer patients.

AU - Linke, Steven P

AU - Bremer, Troy M

AU - Herold, Christopher D

AU - Sauter, Guido

AU - Diamond, Cornelius

PY - 2006

Y1 - 2006

N2 - PURPOSE: This study was designed to produce a model to predict outcome in tamoxifen-treated breast cancer patients based on clinicopathologic features and multiple molecular markers. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: This was a retrospective study of 324 stage I to III female breast cancer patients treated with tamoxifen for whom standard clinicopathologic data and tumor tissue microarrays were available. Nine molecular markers were studied by semiquantitative immunohistochemistry and/or fluorescence in situ hybridization. Cox proportional hazards analysis was used to determine the contributions of each variable to disease-specific and overall survival, and machine learning was used to produce a model to predict patient outcome. RESULTS: On a univariate basis, the following features were significantly associated with worse survival: high pathologic tumor or nodal class, histologic grade, epidermal growth factor receptor, ERBB2, MYC, or TP53; absent estrogen receptor (ER) or progesterone receptor; and low BCL2. CCND1 and CDKN1B did not reach statistical significance. On a multivariate basis, nodal class, ER, and MYC were statistically significant as independent factors for survival. However, the benefit of ER-positive status was moderated by BCL2, ERBB2, and progesterone receptor. BCL2 and TP53 also interacted as an independent risk factor. A kernel partial least squares polynomial model was developed with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.90. CONCLUSIONS: Our data show the predictive value of BCL2, ERBB2, MYC, and TP53 in addition to the standard hormone receptors and clinicopathologic features, and they show the importance of conditional interpretation of certain molecular markers. Our multimarker predictive model performed significantly better than standard guidelines.

AB - PURPOSE: This study was designed to produce a model to predict outcome in tamoxifen-treated breast cancer patients based on clinicopathologic features and multiple molecular markers. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: This was a retrospective study of 324 stage I to III female breast cancer patients treated with tamoxifen for whom standard clinicopathologic data and tumor tissue microarrays were available. Nine molecular markers were studied by semiquantitative immunohistochemistry and/or fluorescence in situ hybridization. Cox proportional hazards analysis was used to determine the contributions of each variable to disease-specific and overall survival, and machine learning was used to produce a model to predict patient outcome. RESULTS: On a univariate basis, the following features were significantly associated with worse survival: high pathologic tumor or nodal class, histologic grade, epidermal growth factor receptor, ERBB2, MYC, or TP53; absent estrogen receptor (ER) or progesterone receptor; and low BCL2. CCND1 and CDKN1B did not reach statistical significance. On a multivariate basis, nodal class, ER, and MYC were statistically significant as independent factors for survival. However, the benefit of ER-positive status was moderated by BCL2, ERBB2, and progesterone receptor. BCL2 and TP53 also interacted as an independent risk factor. A kernel partial least squares polynomial model was developed with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.90. CONCLUSIONS: Our data show the predictive value of BCL2, ERBB2, MYC, and TP53 in addition to the standard hormone receptors and clinicopathologic features, and they show the importance of conditional interpretation of certain molecular markers. Our multimarker predictive model performed significantly better than standard guidelines.

M3 - SCORING: Zeitschriftenaufsatz

VL - 12

SP - 1175

EP - 1183

JO - CLIN CANCER RES

JF - CLIN CANCER RES

SN - 1078-0432

IS - 4

M1 - 4

ER -