A multicenter evaluation of a novel microfluidic rapid AST assay for Gram-negative bloodstream infections

Standard

A multicenter evaluation of a novel microfluidic rapid AST assay for Gram-negative bloodstream infections. / Berinson, Benjamin; Davies, Emma; Torpner, Jessie; Flinkfeldt, Linnea; Fernberg, Jenny; Åman, Amanda; Bergqvist, Johan; Öhrn, Håkan; Ångström, Jonas; Johansson, Cecilia; Jäder, Klara; Andersson, Helena; Ghaderi, Ehsan; Rolf, Maria; Sundqvist, Martin; Rohde, Holger; Fernandez-Zafra, Teresa; Malmberg, Christer.

In: J CLIN MICROBIOL, Vol. 62, No. 10, 16.10.2024, p. e0045824.

Research output: SCORING: Contribution to journalSCORING: Journal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Berinson, B, Davies, E, Torpner, J, Flinkfeldt, L, Fernberg, J, Åman, A, Bergqvist, J, Öhrn, H, Ångström, J, Johansson, C, Jäder, K, Andersson, H, Ghaderi, E, Rolf, M, Sundqvist, M, Rohde, H, Fernandez-Zafra, T & Malmberg, C 2024, 'A multicenter evaluation of a novel microfluidic rapid AST assay for Gram-negative bloodstream infections', J CLIN MICROBIOL, vol. 62, no. 10, pp. e0045824. https://doi.org/10.1128/jcm.00458-24

APA

Berinson, B., Davies, E., Torpner, J., Flinkfeldt, L., Fernberg, J., Åman, A., Bergqvist, J., Öhrn, H., Ångström, J., Johansson, C., Jäder, K., Andersson, H., Ghaderi, E., Rolf, M., Sundqvist, M., Rohde, H., Fernandez-Zafra, T., & Malmberg, C. (2024). A multicenter evaluation of a novel microfluidic rapid AST assay for Gram-negative bloodstream infections. J CLIN MICROBIOL, 62(10), e0045824. https://doi.org/10.1128/jcm.00458-24

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{53421a454d7c41ab9b185d9c7b4eb0c5,
title = "A multicenter evaluation of a novel microfluidic rapid AST assay for Gram-negative bloodstream infections",
abstract = "UNLABELLED: Common phenotypic methods for antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) of bacteria are slow, labor intensive, and display considerable technical variability. The QuickMIC system provides rapid AST using a microfluidic linear gradient. Here, we evaluate the performance of QuickMIC at four different laboratories with regard to speed, precision, accuracy, and reproducibility in comparison to broth microdilution (BMD). Spiked ( n = 411) and clinical blood cultures ( n = 148) were tested with the QuickMIC Gram-negative panel and compared with BMD for the 12 on-panel antibiotics, and 10 defined strains were run at each site to measure reproducibility. Logistic and linear regression analysis was applied to explore factors affecting assay performance. The overall essential agreement and categorical agreement between QuickMIC and BMD were 95.6% and 96.0%, respectively. Very major error, major error, and minor error rates were 1.0%, 0.6%, and 2.4%, respectively. Inter-laboratory reproducibility between the sites was high at 98.9% using the acceptable standard of ±1 twofold dilution. The mean in-instrument analysis time overall was 3 h 13 min (SD: 29 min). Regression analysis indicated that QuickMIC is robust with regard to initial inoculum and delay time after blood culture positivity. We conclude that QuickMIC can be used to rapidly measure MIC directly from blood cultures in clinical settings with high reproducibility, precision, and accuracy. The microfluidics-generated linear gradient ensures high reproducibility between laboratories, thus allowing a high level of trust in MIC values from single testing, at the cost of reduced measurement range compared to BMD. IMPORTANCE: Increasing antimicrobial resistance underscores the need for new diagnostic solutions to guide therapy, but traditional antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) is often inadequate in time-critical diseases such as sepsis. This work presents a novel and rapid AST system with a rapid turnaround of results, which may help reduce the time to guided therapy, possibly allowing early de-escalation of broad-spectrum empirical therapy as well as rapid adjustments to treatments when coverage is lacking.",
author = "Benjamin Berinson and Emma Davies and Jessie Torpner and Linnea Flinkfeldt and Jenny Fernberg and Amanda {\AA}man and Johan Bergqvist and H{\aa}kan {\"O}hrn and Jonas {\AA}ngstr{\"o}m and Cecilia Johansson and Klara J{\"a}der and Helena Andersson and Ehsan Ghaderi and Maria Rolf and Martin Sundqvist and Holger Rohde and Teresa Fernandez-Zafra and Christer Malmberg",
year = "2024",
month = oct,
day = "16",
doi = "10.1128/jcm.00458-24",
language = "English",
volume = "62",
pages = "e0045824",
journal = "J CLIN MICROBIOL",
issn = "0095-1137",
publisher = "American Society for Microbiology",
number = "10",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - A multicenter evaluation of a novel microfluidic rapid AST assay for Gram-negative bloodstream infections

AU - Berinson, Benjamin

AU - Davies, Emma

AU - Torpner, Jessie

AU - Flinkfeldt, Linnea

AU - Fernberg, Jenny

AU - Åman, Amanda

AU - Bergqvist, Johan

AU - Öhrn, Håkan

AU - Ångström, Jonas

AU - Johansson, Cecilia

AU - Jäder, Klara

AU - Andersson, Helena

AU - Ghaderi, Ehsan

AU - Rolf, Maria

AU - Sundqvist, Martin

AU - Rohde, Holger

AU - Fernandez-Zafra, Teresa

AU - Malmberg, Christer

PY - 2024/10/16

Y1 - 2024/10/16

N2 - UNLABELLED: Common phenotypic methods for antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) of bacteria are slow, labor intensive, and display considerable technical variability. The QuickMIC system provides rapid AST using a microfluidic linear gradient. Here, we evaluate the performance of QuickMIC at four different laboratories with regard to speed, precision, accuracy, and reproducibility in comparison to broth microdilution (BMD). Spiked ( n = 411) and clinical blood cultures ( n = 148) were tested with the QuickMIC Gram-negative panel and compared with BMD for the 12 on-panel antibiotics, and 10 defined strains were run at each site to measure reproducibility. Logistic and linear regression analysis was applied to explore factors affecting assay performance. The overall essential agreement and categorical agreement between QuickMIC and BMD were 95.6% and 96.0%, respectively. Very major error, major error, and minor error rates were 1.0%, 0.6%, and 2.4%, respectively. Inter-laboratory reproducibility between the sites was high at 98.9% using the acceptable standard of ±1 twofold dilution. The mean in-instrument analysis time overall was 3 h 13 min (SD: 29 min). Regression analysis indicated that QuickMIC is robust with regard to initial inoculum and delay time after blood culture positivity. We conclude that QuickMIC can be used to rapidly measure MIC directly from blood cultures in clinical settings with high reproducibility, precision, and accuracy. The microfluidics-generated linear gradient ensures high reproducibility between laboratories, thus allowing a high level of trust in MIC values from single testing, at the cost of reduced measurement range compared to BMD. IMPORTANCE: Increasing antimicrobial resistance underscores the need for new diagnostic solutions to guide therapy, but traditional antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) is often inadequate in time-critical diseases such as sepsis. This work presents a novel and rapid AST system with a rapid turnaround of results, which may help reduce the time to guided therapy, possibly allowing early de-escalation of broad-spectrum empirical therapy as well as rapid adjustments to treatments when coverage is lacking.

AB - UNLABELLED: Common phenotypic methods for antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) of bacteria are slow, labor intensive, and display considerable technical variability. The QuickMIC system provides rapid AST using a microfluidic linear gradient. Here, we evaluate the performance of QuickMIC at four different laboratories with regard to speed, precision, accuracy, and reproducibility in comparison to broth microdilution (BMD). Spiked ( n = 411) and clinical blood cultures ( n = 148) were tested with the QuickMIC Gram-negative panel and compared with BMD for the 12 on-panel antibiotics, and 10 defined strains were run at each site to measure reproducibility. Logistic and linear regression analysis was applied to explore factors affecting assay performance. The overall essential agreement and categorical agreement between QuickMIC and BMD were 95.6% and 96.0%, respectively. Very major error, major error, and minor error rates were 1.0%, 0.6%, and 2.4%, respectively. Inter-laboratory reproducibility between the sites was high at 98.9% using the acceptable standard of ±1 twofold dilution. The mean in-instrument analysis time overall was 3 h 13 min (SD: 29 min). Regression analysis indicated that QuickMIC is robust with regard to initial inoculum and delay time after blood culture positivity. We conclude that QuickMIC can be used to rapidly measure MIC directly from blood cultures in clinical settings with high reproducibility, precision, and accuracy. The microfluidics-generated linear gradient ensures high reproducibility between laboratories, thus allowing a high level of trust in MIC values from single testing, at the cost of reduced measurement range compared to BMD. IMPORTANCE: Increasing antimicrobial resistance underscores the need for new diagnostic solutions to guide therapy, but traditional antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) is often inadequate in time-critical diseases such as sepsis. This work presents a novel and rapid AST system with a rapid turnaround of results, which may help reduce the time to guided therapy, possibly allowing early de-escalation of broad-spectrum empirical therapy as well as rapid adjustments to treatments when coverage is lacking.

U2 - 10.1128/jcm.00458-24

DO - 10.1128/jcm.00458-24

M3 - SCORING: Journal article

C2 - 39324811

VL - 62

SP - e0045824

JO - J CLIN MICROBIOL

JF - J CLIN MICROBIOL

SN - 0095-1137

IS - 10

ER -