A mobile app for social anxiety disorder. A three-arm randomized controlled trial comparing mobile and PC-based guided self-help interventions

Standard

A mobile app for social anxiety disorder. A three-arm randomized controlled trial comparing mobile and PC-based guided self-help interventions. / Stolz, Timo; Schulz, Ava; Krieger, Tobias; Vincent, Alessia; Urech, Antoine; Moser, Christian; Westermann, Stefan; Berger, Thomas.

In: J CONSULT CLIN PSYCH, Vol. 86, No. 6, 06.2018, p. 493-504.

Research output: SCORING: Contribution to journalSCORING: Journal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Stolz, T, Schulz, A, Krieger, T, Vincent, A, Urech, A, Moser, C, Westermann, S & Berger, T 2018, 'A mobile app for social anxiety disorder. A three-arm randomized controlled trial comparing mobile and PC-based guided self-help interventions', J CONSULT CLIN PSYCH, vol. 86, no. 6, pp. 493-504. https://doi.org/10.1037/ccp0000301

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{25983beeee5e44b99fe586d7b48f9486,
title = "A mobile app for social anxiety disorder. A three-arm randomized controlled trial comparing mobile and PC-based guided self-help interventions",
abstract = "OBJECTIVE: Internet-based cognitive-behavioral treatments (ICBT) have shown promise for various mental disorders, including social anxiety disorder (SAD). Most of these treatments have been delivered on desktop computers. However, the use of smartphones is becoming ubiquitous and could extend the reach of ICBT into users' everyday life. Only a few studies have empirically examined the efficacy of ICBT delivered through a smartphone app and there is no published study on mobile app delivered ICBT for SAD. This three-arm randomized-controlled trial (RCT) is the first to compare the efficacy of guided ICBT for smartphones (app) and conventional computers (PC) with a wait list control group (WL).METHOD: A total of 150 individuals meeting the diagnostic criteria for SAD were randomly assigned to one of the three conditions. Primary endpoints were self-report measures and diagnostic status of SAD.RESULTS: After 12 weeks of treatment, both active conditions showed superior outcome on the composite of all SAD measures (PC vs. WL: d = 0.74; App vs. WL: d = 0.89) and promising diagnostic response rates (NNTPC = 3.33; NNTApp = 6.00) compared to the WL. No significant between-groups effects were found between the two active conditions on the composite score (Cohen's d = 0.07). Treatment gains were maintained at 3-month follow-up. Program use was more evenly spread throughout the day in the mobile condition, indicating an integration of the program into daily routines.CONCLUSIONS: ICBT can be delivered effectively using smartphones. (PsycINFO Database Record",
keywords = "Adult, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy/methods, Female, Humans, Internet, Male, Middle Aged, Mobile Applications, Phobia, Social/psychology, Self Report, Smartphone, Therapy, Computer-Assisted/methods, Treatment Outcome, Young Adult",
author = "Timo Stolz and Ava Schulz and Tobias Krieger and Alessia Vincent and Antoine Urech and Christian Moser and Stefan Westermann and Thomas Berger",
note = "(c) 2018 APA, all rights reserved).",
year = "2018",
month = jun,
doi = "10.1037/ccp0000301",
language = "English",
volume = "86",
pages = "493--504",
journal = "J CONSULT CLIN PSYCH",
issn = "0022-006X",
publisher = "American Psychological Association Inc.",
number = "6",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - A mobile app for social anxiety disorder. A three-arm randomized controlled trial comparing mobile and PC-based guided self-help interventions

AU - Stolz, Timo

AU - Schulz, Ava

AU - Krieger, Tobias

AU - Vincent, Alessia

AU - Urech, Antoine

AU - Moser, Christian

AU - Westermann, Stefan

AU - Berger, Thomas

N1 - (c) 2018 APA, all rights reserved).

PY - 2018/6

Y1 - 2018/6

N2 - OBJECTIVE: Internet-based cognitive-behavioral treatments (ICBT) have shown promise for various mental disorders, including social anxiety disorder (SAD). Most of these treatments have been delivered on desktop computers. However, the use of smartphones is becoming ubiquitous and could extend the reach of ICBT into users' everyday life. Only a few studies have empirically examined the efficacy of ICBT delivered through a smartphone app and there is no published study on mobile app delivered ICBT for SAD. This three-arm randomized-controlled trial (RCT) is the first to compare the efficacy of guided ICBT for smartphones (app) and conventional computers (PC) with a wait list control group (WL).METHOD: A total of 150 individuals meeting the diagnostic criteria for SAD were randomly assigned to one of the three conditions. Primary endpoints were self-report measures and diagnostic status of SAD.RESULTS: After 12 weeks of treatment, both active conditions showed superior outcome on the composite of all SAD measures (PC vs. WL: d = 0.74; App vs. WL: d = 0.89) and promising diagnostic response rates (NNTPC = 3.33; NNTApp = 6.00) compared to the WL. No significant between-groups effects were found between the two active conditions on the composite score (Cohen's d = 0.07). Treatment gains were maintained at 3-month follow-up. Program use was more evenly spread throughout the day in the mobile condition, indicating an integration of the program into daily routines.CONCLUSIONS: ICBT can be delivered effectively using smartphones. (PsycINFO Database Record

AB - OBJECTIVE: Internet-based cognitive-behavioral treatments (ICBT) have shown promise for various mental disorders, including social anxiety disorder (SAD). Most of these treatments have been delivered on desktop computers. However, the use of smartphones is becoming ubiquitous and could extend the reach of ICBT into users' everyday life. Only a few studies have empirically examined the efficacy of ICBT delivered through a smartphone app and there is no published study on mobile app delivered ICBT for SAD. This three-arm randomized-controlled trial (RCT) is the first to compare the efficacy of guided ICBT for smartphones (app) and conventional computers (PC) with a wait list control group (WL).METHOD: A total of 150 individuals meeting the diagnostic criteria for SAD were randomly assigned to one of the three conditions. Primary endpoints were self-report measures and diagnostic status of SAD.RESULTS: After 12 weeks of treatment, both active conditions showed superior outcome on the composite of all SAD measures (PC vs. WL: d = 0.74; App vs. WL: d = 0.89) and promising diagnostic response rates (NNTPC = 3.33; NNTApp = 6.00) compared to the WL. No significant between-groups effects were found between the two active conditions on the composite score (Cohen's d = 0.07). Treatment gains were maintained at 3-month follow-up. Program use was more evenly spread throughout the day in the mobile condition, indicating an integration of the program into daily routines.CONCLUSIONS: ICBT can be delivered effectively using smartphones. (PsycINFO Database Record

KW - Adult

KW - Cognitive Behavioral Therapy/methods

KW - Female

KW - Humans

KW - Internet

KW - Male

KW - Middle Aged

KW - Mobile Applications

KW - Phobia, Social/psychology

KW - Self Report

KW - Smartphone

KW - Therapy, Computer-Assisted/methods

KW - Treatment Outcome

KW - Young Adult

U2 - 10.1037/ccp0000301

DO - 10.1037/ccp0000301

M3 - SCORING: Journal article

C2 - 29781648

VL - 86

SP - 493

EP - 504

JO - J CONSULT CLIN PSYCH

JF - J CONSULT CLIN PSYCH

SN - 0022-006X

IS - 6

ER -