A follow-up study of long-term results after cochlear implantation in children and adolescents.

Standard

A follow-up study of long-term results after cochlear implantation in children and adolescents. / Kiefer, J; Gall, V; Desloovere, C; Knecht, Rainald; Mikowski, A; von Ilberg, C.

In: EUR ARCH OTO-RHINO-L, Vol. 253, No. 3, 3, 1996, p. 158-166.

Research output: SCORING: Contribution to journalSCORING: Journal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Kiefer, J, Gall, V, Desloovere, C, Knecht, R, Mikowski, A & von Ilberg, C 1996, 'A follow-up study of long-term results after cochlear implantation in children and adolescents.', EUR ARCH OTO-RHINO-L, vol. 253, no. 3, 3, pp. 158-166. <http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8652158?dopt=Citation>

APA

Kiefer, J., Gall, V., Desloovere, C., Knecht, R., Mikowski, A., & von Ilberg, C. (1996). A follow-up study of long-term results after cochlear implantation in children and adolescents. EUR ARCH OTO-RHINO-L, 253(3), 158-166. [3]. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8652158?dopt=Citation

Vancouver

Kiefer J, Gall V, Desloovere C, Knecht R, Mikowski A, von Ilberg C. A follow-up study of long-term results after cochlear implantation in children and adolescents. EUR ARCH OTO-RHINO-L. 1996;253(3):158-166. 3.

Bibtex

@article{18369d5fd8dc4e0889f49695fd7cdadc,
title = "A follow-up study of long-term results after cochlear implantation in children and adolescents.",
abstract = "The time course of speech development in children after cochlear implantation may extend over many years, thus making long-term studies necessary to evaluate any outcome. We report our long-term results after cochlear implantation in children and adolescents. Mean follow-up was 28 months, ranging from 1 to 5 years. After at least 1 year of experience all children were found to benefit from their cochlear implants. The majority of children scored above chance in speech identification tasks requiring closed set word and sentence understanding). At the 4-year interval, all children tested including prelingually deaf children had developed open set sentence understanding. The most relevant factor accounting for differences in the results was the duration of implant use in all groups. Even beyond 3 years the results continued to improve. Peri- or postlingually deafened children tended to have favorable results. For prelingually deaf children, duration of deafness and age at implantation were correlated negatively with the results.",
author = "J Kiefer and V Gall and C Desloovere and Rainald Knecht and A Mikowski and {von Ilberg}, C",
year = "1996",
language = "Deutsch",
volume = "253",
pages = "158--166",
journal = "EUR ARCH OTO-RHINO-L",
issn = "0937-4477",
publisher = "Springer",
number = "3",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - A follow-up study of long-term results after cochlear implantation in children and adolescents.

AU - Kiefer, J

AU - Gall, V

AU - Desloovere, C

AU - Knecht, Rainald

AU - Mikowski, A

AU - von Ilberg, C

PY - 1996

Y1 - 1996

N2 - The time course of speech development in children after cochlear implantation may extend over many years, thus making long-term studies necessary to evaluate any outcome. We report our long-term results after cochlear implantation in children and adolescents. Mean follow-up was 28 months, ranging from 1 to 5 years. After at least 1 year of experience all children were found to benefit from their cochlear implants. The majority of children scored above chance in speech identification tasks requiring closed set word and sentence understanding). At the 4-year interval, all children tested including prelingually deaf children had developed open set sentence understanding. The most relevant factor accounting for differences in the results was the duration of implant use in all groups. Even beyond 3 years the results continued to improve. Peri- or postlingually deafened children tended to have favorable results. For prelingually deaf children, duration of deafness and age at implantation were correlated negatively with the results.

AB - The time course of speech development in children after cochlear implantation may extend over many years, thus making long-term studies necessary to evaluate any outcome. We report our long-term results after cochlear implantation in children and adolescents. Mean follow-up was 28 months, ranging from 1 to 5 years. After at least 1 year of experience all children were found to benefit from their cochlear implants. The majority of children scored above chance in speech identification tasks requiring closed set word and sentence understanding). At the 4-year interval, all children tested including prelingually deaf children had developed open set sentence understanding. The most relevant factor accounting for differences in the results was the duration of implant use in all groups. Even beyond 3 years the results continued to improve. Peri- or postlingually deafened children tended to have favorable results. For prelingually deaf children, duration of deafness and age at implantation were correlated negatively with the results.

M3 - SCORING: Zeitschriftenaufsatz

VL - 253

SP - 158

EP - 166

JO - EUR ARCH OTO-RHINO-L

JF - EUR ARCH OTO-RHINO-L

SN - 0937-4477

IS - 3

M1 - 3

ER -