Research ExplorerPublicationsA 7-day recall period for a clinical application of the oral...

A 7-day recall period for a clinical application of the oral health impact profile questionnaire

Standard

A 7-day recall period for a clinical application of the oral health impact profile questionnaire. / Waller, Niels; John, Mike T; Feuerstahler, Leah; Baba, Kazuyoshi; Larsson, Pernilla; Peršić, Sanja; Kende, Dóra; Reissmann, Daniel R; Rener-Sitar, Ksenija.

In: CLIN ORAL INVEST, Vol. 20, No. 1, 01.01.2016, p. 91-99.

Research output: SCORING: Contribution to journal › SCORING: Journal article › Research › peer-review

Harvard

Waller, N, John, MT, Feuerstahler, L, Baba, K, Larsson, P, Peršić, S, Kende, D, Reissmann, DR & Rener-Sitar, K 2016, 'A 7-day recall period for a clinical application of the oral health impact profile questionnaire', CLIN ORAL INVEST, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 91-99. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-015-1484-6

APA

Waller, N., John, M. T., Feuerstahler, L., Baba, K., Larsson, P., Peršić, S., Kende, D., Reissmann, D. R., & Rener-Sitar, K. (2016). A 7-day recall period for a clinical application of the oral health impact profile questionnaire. CLIN ORAL INVEST, 20(1), 91-99. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-015-1484-6

Vancouver

Waller N, John MT, Feuerstahler L, Baba K, Larsson P, Peršić S et al. A 7-day recall period for a clinical application of the oral health impact profile questionnaire. CLIN ORAL INVEST. 2016 Jan 1;20(1):91-99. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-015-1484-6

Bibtex

@article{aa4a813e5c824892a4c42059748adba1,
title = "A 7-day recall period for a clinical application of the oral health impact profile questionnaire",
abstract = "OBJECTIVES: Aims were to investigate and compare the validity and reliability of Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP) scores referencing 7-day and 1-month recall periods in international prosthodontic patients.MATERIAL AND METHODS: A sample of 267 patients (mean age = 54.0 years, SD = 17.2 years, 58 % women) with stable oral health-related quality of life was recruited from prosthodontic treatment centers in Croatia, Germany, Hungary, Japan, Slovenia, and Sweden. These patients completed the OHIP on two occasions using a new 7-day recall period and the traditional 1-month recall period. OHIP score validity and reliability were investigated with structural equation models (SEMs) that included OHIPpast 7 days and OHIP1 month latent factors and single indicator measures of global oral health status. The SEMs assessed measurement invariance and the relative validities of the two OHIP latent factors (representing the two recall periods).RESULTS: The SEMs provided cogent evidence for recall period measurement invariance for the two OHIP forms and equal validities (r = .48) with external measures of global oral health status.CONCLUSION: When assessed in international prosthodontic patients, OHIP scores using the new 7-day recall period were as reliable and valid as the scores using the 1-month recall period.CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Conceptual advantages make a 7-day recall period a preferred frame of reference in clinical applications of the OHIP questionnaire.",
author = "Niels Waller and John, {Mike T} and Leah Feuerstahler and Kazuyoshi Baba and Pernilla Larsson and Sanja Per{\v s}i{\'c} and D{\'o}ra Kende and Reissmann, {Daniel R} and Ksenija Rener-Sitar",
year = "2016",
month = jan,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s00784-015-1484-6",
language = "English",
volume = "20",
pages = "91--99",
journal = "CLIN ORAL INVEST",
issn = "1432-6981",
publisher = "Springer",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - A 7-day recall period for a clinical application of the oral health impact profile questionnaire

AU - Waller, Niels

AU - John, Mike T

AU - Feuerstahler, Leah

AU - Baba, Kazuyoshi

AU - Larsson, Pernilla

AU - Peršić, Sanja

AU - Kende, Dóra

AU - Reissmann, Daniel R

AU - Rener-Sitar, Ksenija

PY - 2016/1/1

Y1 - 2016/1/1

N2 - OBJECTIVES: Aims were to investigate and compare the validity and reliability of Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP) scores referencing 7-day and 1-month recall periods in international prosthodontic patients.MATERIAL AND METHODS: A sample of 267 patients (mean age = 54.0 years, SD = 17.2 years, 58 % women) with stable oral health-related quality of life was recruited from prosthodontic treatment centers in Croatia, Germany, Hungary, Japan, Slovenia, and Sweden. These patients completed the OHIP on two occasions using a new 7-day recall period and the traditional 1-month recall period. OHIP score validity and reliability were investigated with structural equation models (SEMs) that included OHIPpast 7 days and OHIP1 month latent factors and single indicator measures of global oral health status. The SEMs assessed measurement invariance and the relative validities of the two OHIP latent factors (representing the two recall periods).RESULTS: The SEMs provided cogent evidence for recall period measurement invariance for the two OHIP forms and equal validities (r = .48) with external measures of global oral health status.CONCLUSION: When assessed in international prosthodontic patients, OHIP scores using the new 7-day recall period were as reliable and valid as the scores using the 1-month recall period.CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Conceptual advantages make a 7-day recall period a preferred frame of reference in clinical applications of the OHIP questionnaire.

AB - OBJECTIVES: Aims were to investigate and compare the validity and reliability of Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP) scores referencing 7-day and 1-month recall periods in international prosthodontic patients.MATERIAL AND METHODS: A sample of 267 patients (mean age = 54.0 years, SD = 17.2 years, 58 % women) with stable oral health-related quality of life was recruited from prosthodontic treatment centers in Croatia, Germany, Hungary, Japan, Slovenia, and Sweden. These patients completed the OHIP on two occasions using a new 7-day recall period and the traditional 1-month recall period. OHIP score validity and reliability were investigated with structural equation models (SEMs) that included OHIPpast 7 days and OHIP1 month latent factors and single indicator measures of global oral health status. The SEMs assessed measurement invariance and the relative validities of the two OHIP latent factors (representing the two recall periods).RESULTS: The SEMs provided cogent evidence for recall period measurement invariance for the two OHIP forms and equal validities (r = .48) with external measures of global oral health status.CONCLUSION: When assessed in international prosthodontic patients, OHIP scores using the new 7-day recall period were as reliable and valid as the scores using the 1-month recall period.CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Conceptual advantages make a 7-day recall period a preferred frame of reference in clinical applications of the OHIP questionnaire.

U2 - 10.1007/s00784-015-1484-6

DO - 10.1007/s00784-015-1484-6

M3 - SCORING: Journal article

C2 - 25944561

VL - 20

SP - 91

EP - 99

JO - CLIN ORAL INVEST

JF - CLIN ORAL INVEST

SN - 1432-6981

IS - 1

ER -