10-year results following impaction bone grafting of major bone defects in 29 rotational and hinged knee revision arthroplasties: a follow-up of a previous report

Standard

10-year results following impaction bone grafting of major bone defects in 29 rotational and hinged knee revision arthroplasties: a follow-up of a previous report. / Hilgen, Verena; Citak, Mustafa; Vettorazzi, Eik; Haasper, Carl; Day, Kimberly; Amling, Michael; Gehrke, Thorsten; Gebauer, Matthias.

In: ACTA ORTHOP, Vol. 84, No. 4, 01.08.2013, p. 387-91.

Research output: SCORING: Contribution to journalSCORING: Journal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{9fc73f52e70a401b911106d20c6df74a,
title = "10-year results following impaction bone grafting of major bone defects in 29 rotational and hinged knee revision arthroplasties: a follow-up of a previous report",
abstract = "BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Substantial bone loss in revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a challenging problem. We studied whether impaction bone grafting provides long-term restoration of bone stock in the treatment of major bone defects in revision surgery of rotational and hinged knee arthroplasties (LINK Endo-Model).PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between 1996 and 2006, 29 knees in 29 patients underwent revision procedures of rotational and hinged knee arthroplasties using impaction bone grafting (IBG) to reconstruct major bone defects. At the latest follow-up, the clinical examination included the Knee Society score (KSS), standardized radiographs, and a questionnaire for the WOMAC score.RESULTS: After a mean follow-up of 10 (6-13) years, 14 knees with 19 IBG reconstructions (5 total, 9 partial revisions) had failed. 12 knees were treated with re-revision surgery mean 5 (1-12) years after the first revision, due to mechanical failure and aseptic loosening of the components. In all these failed cases, the surgeon observed a lack of incorporation with bone graft resorption in the femur or tibia during the re-revision procedure. In all 15 knees that were not re-revised, with 21 reconstructions (6 total, 9 partial revisions), an improvement in the combined KSS score (knee score + function score) of 60 points (p < 0.001) was found at the latest follow-up. In 12 of these knees, a clear incorporation with no visible radiolucent lines around the component and no sign of substantial graft resorption was noted, while unclear radiographic graft incorporation was seen in 3 knees.INTERPRETATION: Our results clearly indicate that IBG alone is not a methodologically sound technique in the revision of rotational and hinged knee arthroplasties.",
keywords = "Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee, Bone Transplantation, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Knee Joint, Middle Aged, Reoperation, Survival Analysis, Treatment Failure, Treatment Outcome",
author = "Verena Hilgen and Mustafa Citak and Eik Vettorazzi and Carl Haasper and Kimberly Day and Michael Amling and Thorsten Gehrke and Matthias Gebauer",
year = "2013",
month = aug,
day = "1",
doi = "10.3109/17453674.2013.814012",
language = "English",
volume = "84",
pages = "387--91",
journal = "ACTA ORTHOP",
issn = "1745-3674",
publisher = "informa healthcare",
number = "4",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - 10-year results following impaction bone grafting of major bone defects in 29 rotational and hinged knee revision arthroplasties: a follow-up of a previous report

AU - Hilgen, Verena

AU - Citak, Mustafa

AU - Vettorazzi, Eik

AU - Haasper, Carl

AU - Day, Kimberly

AU - Amling, Michael

AU - Gehrke, Thorsten

AU - Gebauer, Matthias

PY - 2013/8/1

Y1 - 2013/8/1

N2 - BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Substantial bone loss in revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a challenging problem. We studied whether impaction bone grafting provides long-term restoration of bone stock in the treatment of major bone defects in revision surgery of rotational and hinged knee arthroplasties (LINK Endo-Model).PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between 1996 and 2006, 29 knees in 29 patients underwent revision procedures of rotational and hinged knee arthroplasties using impaction bone grafting (IBG) to reconstruct major bone defects. At the latest follow-up, the clinical examination included the Knee Society score (KSS), standardized radiographs, and a questionnaire for the WOMAC score.RESULTS: After a mean follow-up of 10 (6-13) years, 14 knees with 19 IBG reconstructions (5 total, 9 partial revisions) had failed. 12 knees were treated with re-revision surgery mean 5 (1-12) years after the first revision, due to mechanical failure and aseptic loosening of the components. In all these failed cases, the surgeon observed a lack of incorporation with bone graft resorption in the femur or tibia during the re-revision procedure. In all 15 knees that were not re-revised, with 21 reconstructions (6 total, 9 partial revisions), an improvement in the combined KSS score (knee score + function score) of 60 points (p < 0.001) was found at the latest follow-up. In 12 of these knees, a clear incorporation with no visible radiolucent lines around the component and no sign of substantial graft resorption was noted, while unclear radiographic graft incorporation was seen in 3 knees.INTERPRETATION: Our results clearly indicate that IBG alone is not a methodologically sound technique in the revision of rotational and hinged knee arthroplasties.

AB - BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Substantial bone loss in revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a challenging problem. We studied whether impaction bone grafting provides long-term restoration of bone stock in the treatment of major bone defects in revision surgery of rotational and hinged knee arthroplasties (LINK Endo-Model).PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between 1996 and 2006, 29 knees in 29 patients underwent revision procedures of rotational and hinged knee arthroplasties using impaction bone grafting (IBG) to reconstruct major bone defects. At the latest follow-up, the clinical examination included the Knee Society score (KSS), standardized radiographs, and a questionnaire for the WOMAC score.RESULTS: After a mean follow-up of 10 (6-13) years, 14 knees with 19 IBG reconstructions (5 total, 9 partial revisions) had failed. 12 knees were treated with re-revision surgery mean 5 (1-12) years after the first revision, due to mechanical failure and aseptic loosening of the components. In all these failed cases, the surgeon observed a lack of incorporation with bone graft resorption in the femur or tibia during the re-revision procedure. In all 15 knees that were not re-revised, with 21 reconstructions (6 total, 9 partial revisions), an improvement in the combined KSS score (knee score + function score) of 60 points (p < 0.001) was found at the latest follow-up. In 12 of these knees, a clear incorporation with no visible radiolucent lines around the component and no sign of substantial graft resorption was noted, while unclear radiographic graft incorporation was seen in 3 knees.INTERPRETATION: Our results clearly indicate that IBG alone is not a methodologically sound technique in the revision of rotational and hinged knee arthroplasties.

KW - Adult

KW - Aged

KW - Aged, 80 and over

KW - Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee

KW - Bone Transplantation

KW - Follow-Up Studies

KW - Humans

KW - Knee Joint

KW - Middle Aged

KW - Reoperation

KW - Survival Analysis

KW - Treatment Failure

KW - Treatment Outcome

U2 - 10.3109/17453674.2013.814012

DO - 10.3109/17453674.2013.814012

M3 - SCORING: Journal article

C2 - 23799350

VL - 84

SP - 387

EP - 391

JO - ACTA ORTHOP

JF - ACTA ORTHOP

SN - 1745-3674

IS - 4

ER -