PortalPublikationenZur Kontroverse um die Wirksamkeit psychodynamischer Therapi...

Zur Kontroverse um die Wirksamkeit psychodynamischer Therapie

Standard

Zur Kontroverse um die Wirksamkeit psychodynamischer Therapie. / Leichsenring, Falk; Rabung, Sven.

in: Z PSYCHOSOM MED PSYC, Jahrgang 59, Nr. 1, 01.01.2013, S. 13-32.

Publikationen: SCORING: Beitrag in Fachzeitschrift/Zeitung › SCORING: Zeitschriftenaufsatz › Forschung › Begutachtung

Harvard

Leichsenring, F & Rabung, S 2013, 'Zur Kontroverse um die Wirksamkeit psychodynamischer Therapie', Z PSYCHOSOM MED PSYC, Jg. 59, Nr. 1, S. 13-32. https://doi.org/10.13109/zptm.2013.59.1.13

APA

Leichsenring, F., & Rabung, S. (2013). Zur Kontroverse um die Wirksamkeit psychodynamischer Therapie. Z PSYCHOSOM MED PSYC, 59(1), 13-32. https://doi.org/10.13109/zptm.2013.59.1.13

Vancouver

Leichsenring F, Rabung S. Zur Kontroverse um die Wirksamkeit psychodynamischer Therapie. Z PSYCHOSOM MED PSYC. 2013 Jan 1;59(1):13-32. https://doi.org/10.13109/zptm.2013.59.1.13

Bibtex

@article{765ab49221304ecfbfa8eb6590788238,
title = "Zur Kontroverse um die Wirksamkeit psychodynamischer Therapie",
abstract = "There is growing evidence from randomized controlled trials supporting the efficacy of psychodynamic psychotherapy (PDT) in specific mental disorders. Yet the evidence for the efficacy of psychodynamic psychotherapy has not gone unchallenged. Several responses have addressed these concerns, showing that most of the criticism was not justified. Nevertheless, the evidence for psychodynamic psychotherapy continues to be frequently ignored, criticized or presented in a distorted way. A recent controversy published in the Nervenarzt may serve as an illustrative example, which is discussed here more in detail. This example shows that some authors are not interested in a truly scientific discussion, but rather try to discredit a rival method of psychotherapy and its scientific representatives for political reasons.",
keywords = "Evidence-Based Medicine, Germany, Humans, Long-Term Care, Mental Disorders, Psychoanalytic Therapy, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Research Design, Treatment Outcome",
author = "Falk Leichsenring and Sven Rabung",
year = "2013",
month = jan,
day = "1",
doi = "10.13109/zptm.2013.59.1.13",
language = "Deutsch",
volume = "59",
pages = "13--32",
journal = "Z PSYCHOSOM MED PSYC",
issn = "1438-3608",
publisher = "Vandenhoeck and Ruprecht GmbH and Co. KG",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Zur Kontroverse um die Wirksamkeit psychodynamischer Therapie

AU - Leichsenring, Falk

AU - Rabung, Sven

PY - 2013/1/1

Y1 - 2013/1/1

N2 - There is growing evidence from randomized controlled trials supporting the efficacy of psychodynamic psychotherapy (PDT) in specific mental disorders. Yet the evidence for the efficacy of psychodynamic psychotherapy has not gone unchallenged. Several responses have addressed these concerns, showing that most of the criticism was not justified. Nevertheless, the evidence for psychodynamic psychotherapy continues to be frequently ignored, criticized or presented in a distorted way. A recent controversy published in the Nervenarzt may serve as an illustrative example, which is discussed here more in detail. This example shows that some authors are not interested in a truly scientific discussion, but rather try to discredit a rival method of psychotherapy and its scientific representatives for political reasons.

AB - There is growing evidence from randomized controlled trials supporting the efficacy of psychodynamic psychotherapy (PDT) in specific mental disorders. Yet the evidence for the efficacy of psychodynamic psychotherapy has not gone unchallenged. Several responses have addressed these concerns, showing that most of the criticism was not justified. Nevertheless, the evidence for psychodynamic psychotherapy continues to be frequently ignored, criticized or presented in a distorted way. A recent controversy published in the Nervenarzt may serve as an illustrative example, which is discussed here more in detail. This example shows that some authors are not interested in a truly scientific discussion, but rather try to discredit a rival method of psychotherapy and its scientific representatives for political reasons.

KW - Evidence-Based Medicine

KW - Germany

KW - Humans

KW - Long-Term Care

KW - Mental Disorders

KW - Psychoanalytic Therapy

KW - Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic

KW - Research Design

KW - Treatment Outcome

U2 - 10.13109/zptm.2013.59.1.13

DO - 10.13109/zptm.2013.59.1.13

M3 - SCORING: Zeitschriftenaufsatz

C2 - 23467995

VL - 59

SP - 13

EP - 32

JO - Z PSYCHOSOM MED PSYC

JF - Z PSYCHOSOM MED PSYC

SN - 1438-3608

IS - 1

ER -