Worst itch numerical rating scale for prurigo nodularis: a psychometric evaluation

Standard

Worst itch numerical rating scale for prurigo nodularis: a psychometric evaluation. / Ständer, S; Zeidler, C; Pereira, M; Szepietowski, J C; McLeod, L; Qin, S; Williams, N; Sciascia, T; Augustin, M.

in: J EUR ACAD DERMATOL, Jahrgang 36, Nr. 4, 04.2022, S. 573-581.

Publikationen: SCORING: Beitrag in Fachzeitschrift/ZeitungSCORING: ZeitschriftenaufsatzForschungBegutachtung

Harvard

Ständer, S, Zeidler, C, Pereira, M, Szepietowski, JC, McLeod, L, Qin, S, Williams, N, Sciascia, T & Augustin, M 2022, 'Worst itch numerical rating scale for prurigo nodularis: a psychometric evaluation', J EUR ACAD DERMATOL, Jg. 36, Nr. 4, S. 573-581. https://doi.org/10.1111/jdv.17870

APA

Ständer, S., Zeidler, C., Pereira, M., Szepietowski, J. C., McLeod, L., Qin, S., Williams, N., Sciascia, T., & Augustin, M. (2022). Worst itch numerical rating scale for prurigo nodularis: a psychometric evaluation. J EUR ACAD DERMATOL, 36(4), 573-581. https://doi.org/10.1111/jdv.17870

Vancouver

Ständer S, Zeidler C, Pereira M, Szepietowski JC, McLeod L, Qin S et al. Worst itch numerical rating scale for prurigo nodularis: a psychometric evaluation. J EUR ACAD DERMATOL. 2022 Apr;36(4):573-581. https://doi.org/10.1111/jdv.17870

Bibtex

@article{f7c4849c83384866a3b9a490905edeb0,
title = "Worst itch numerical rating scale for prurigo nodularis: a psychometric evaluation",
abstract = "BACKGROUND: Study TR03 evaluated the safety and efficacy of nalbuphine ER for prurigo nodularis (PN; NCT02174419).OBJECTIVE: We conducted supplementary analyses to assess the psychometric properties of the Worst Itch Numeric Rating Scale (WI-NRS), the TR03 primary endpoint.METHODS: Study TR03 was a double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2 trial in PN patients with documented scores ≥5 on the WI-NRS (0 [no itch]-10 [worst itch imaginable]) on ≥5 of 7 days before baseline. Using TR03 data, the WI-NRS's psychometric properties, including reliability, validity and ability to detect change, were evaluated. A responder threshold was estimated to facilitate interpretation of WI-NRS score changes.RESULTS: Amongst 62 treated patients, improvements in mean [SD] (median) WI-NRS scores were observed between baseline (8.2 [1.21] (8.1)) and week 10 (5.8 [2.43] (6.0)). The WI-NRS had an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.96 (95% confidence interval, 0.93-0.98) in 42 patients who had stable Itch verbal rating scale (VRS) scores from week 9-10, supporting strong test-retest reliability. Construct validity was supported, with strong correlations at week 10 with Average Itch NRS (r = 0.87) and Itch VRS single-day/weekly mean scores (r = 0.81/0.89) and moderate correlations with ItchyQoL{\texttrademark} total/domain scores (r = 0.41-0.43). The WI-NRS discriminated between predefined severity subgroups based on the Itch VRS and detected changes in itching severity (effect-size estimate: -2.05; standardized response mean: -1.21). An anchor-based threshold based on a two-category improvement in the single-day Itch VRS suggests a responder threshold of ≥3.8 points (~40% improvement).CONCLUSIONS: The WI-NRS demonstrates good measurement properties, supporting its use in evaluating treatment change in PN.",
keywords = "Double-Blind Method, Humans, Prurigo/diagnosis, Pruritus/diagnosis, Psychometrics, Reproducibility of Results, Severity of Illness Index",
author = "S St{\"a}nder and C Zeidler and M Pereira and Szepietowski, {J C} and L McLeod and S Qin and N Williams and T Sciascia and M Augustin",
note = "{\textcopyright} 2021 European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology.",
year = "2022",
month = apr,
doi = "10.1111/jdv.17870",
language = "English",
volume = "36",
pages = "573--581",
journal = "J EUR ACAD DERMATOL",
issn = "0926-9959",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "4",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Worst itch numerical rating scale for prurigo nodularis: a psychometric evaluation

AU - Ständer, S

AU - Zeidler, C

AU - Pereira, M

AU - Szepietowski, J C

AU - McLeod, L

AU - Qin, S

AU - Williams, N

AU - Sciascia, T

AU - Augustin, M

N1 - © 2021 European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology.

PY - 2022/4

Y1 - 2022/4

N2 - BACKGROUND: Study TR03 evaluated the safety and efficacy of nalbuphine ER for prurigo nodularis (PN; NCT02174419).OBJECTIVE: We conducted supplementary analyses to assess the psychometric properties of the Worst Itch Numeric Rating Scale (WI-NRS), the TR03 primary endpoint.METHODS: Study TR03 was a double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2 trial in PN patients with documented scores ≥5 on the WI-NRS (0 [no itch]-10 [worst itch imaginable]) on ≥5 of 7 days before baseline. Using TR03 data, the WI-NRS's psychometric properties, including reliability, validity and ability to detect change, were evaluated. A responder threshold was estimated to facilitate interpretation of WI-NRS score changes.RESULTS: Amongst 62 treated patients, improvements in mean [SD] (median) WI-NRS scores were observed between baseline (8.2 [1.21] (8.1)) and week 10 (5.8 [2.43] (6.0)). The WI-NRS had an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.96 (95% confidence interval, 0.93-0.98) in 42 patients who had stable Itch verbal rating scale (VRS) scores from week 9-10, supporting strong test-retest reliability. Construct validity was supported, with strong correlations at week 10 with Average Itch NRS (r = 0.87) and Itch VRS single-day/weekly mean scores (r = 0.81/0.89) and moderate correlations with ItchyQoL™ total/domain scores (r = 0.41-0.43). The WI-NRS discriminated between predefined severity subgroups based on the Itch VRS and detected changes in itching severity (effect-size estimate: -2.05; standardized response mean: -1.21). An anchor-based threshold based on a two-category improvement in the single-day Itch VRS suggests a responder threshold of ≥3.8 points (~40% improvement).CONCLUSIONS: The WI-NRS demonstrates good measurement properties, supporting its use in evaluating treatment change in PN.

AB - BACKGROUND: Study TR03 evaluated the safety and efficacy of nalbuphine ER for prurigo nodularis (PN; NCT02174419).OBJECTIVE: We conducted supplementary analyses to assess the psychometric properties of the Worst Itch Numeric Rating Scale (WI-NRS), the TR03 primary endpoint.METHODS: Study TR03 was a double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2 trial in PN patients with documented scores ≥5 on the WI-NRS (0 [no itch]-10 [worst itch imaginable]) on ≥5 of 7 days before baseline. Using TR03 data, the WI-NRS's psychometric properties, including reliability, validity and ability to detect change, were evaluated. A responder threshold was estimated to facilitate interpretation of WI-NRS score changes.RESULTS: Amongst 62 treated patients, improvements in mean [SD] (median) WI-NRS scores were observed between baseline (8.2 [1.21] (8.1)) and week 10 (5.8 [2.43] (6.0)). The WI-NRS had an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.96 (95% confidence interval, 0.93-0.98) in 42 patients who had stable Itch verbal rating scale (VRS) scores from week 9-10, supporting strong test-retest reliability. Construct validity was supported, with strong correlations at week 10 with Average Itch NRS (r = 0.87) and Itch VRS single-day/weekly mean scores (r = 0.81/0.89) and moderate correlations with ItchyQoL™ total/domain scores (r = 0.41-0.43). The WI-NRS discriminated between predefined severity subgroups based on the Itch VRS and detected changes in itching severity (effect-size estimate: -2.05; standardized response mean: -1.21). An anchor-based threshold based on a two-category improvement in the single-day Itch VRS suggests a responder threshold of ≥3.8 points (~40% improvement).CONCLUSIONS: The WI-NRS demonstrates good measurement properties, supporting its use in evaluating treatment change in PN.

KW - Double-Blind Method

KW - Humans

KW - Prurigo/diagnosis

KW - Pruritus/diagnosis

KW - Psychometrics

KW - Reproducibility of Results

KW - Severity of Illness Index

U2 - 10.1111/jdv.17870

DO - 10.1111/jdv.17870

M3 - SCORING: Journal article

C2 - 34908192

VL - 36

SP - 573

EP - 581

JO - J EUR ACAD DERMATOL

JF - J EUR ACAD DERMATOL

SN - 0926-9959

IS - 4

ER -