Whispering-A Single-Subject Study of Glottal Configuration and Aerodynamics.

Standard

Whispering-A Single-Subject Study of Glottal Configuration and Aerodynamics. / Sundberg, Johan; Scherer, Ronald; Hess, Markus; Müller, Frank.

in: J VOICE, Jahrgang 24, Nr. 5, 5, 2010, S. 574-584.

Publikationen: SCORING: Beitrag in Fachzeitschrift/ZeitungSCORING: ZeitschriftenaufsatzForschungBegutachtung

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{c516094c80c54cd288849d029191f526,
title = "Whispering-A Single-Subject Study of Glottal Configuration and Aerodynamics.",
abstract = "Whisper productions were produced by a single adult male subject over a wide range of subglottal pressures, glottal areas, and glottal flows. Dimensional measurements were made of these three variables, including glottal perimeter. Subglottal pressure was directly obtained by a pressure transducer in a tracheal catheter, and wide-band flow with a pneumotach mask. Four types of whispers were used-hyperfunctional, hypofunctional, neutral, and postphonation-in addition to three levels of loudness (soft, medium, loud). Sequences of the /pae/ syllable were used. Video recordings of the larynx were made. The glottis was outlined by hand with extrapolation for unseen parts, and area and perimeter were obtained through image analysis software. The whisper tokens resulted in the following wide ranges: subglottal pressure: 1.3-17cm H(2)O; glottal flow: 0.9-1.71L/s; glottal area: 0.065-1.76cm(2); and glottal perimeter: 1.09-6.55cm. Hyperfunctional whisper tended to have higher subglottal pressures and lower areas and flows than hypofunctional whisper, with neutral and postphonation whisper values in between. An important finding is that glottal flow changed more for small changes of area when the area was already small, and did not create much flow change when area was changed for already larger areas; that is, whisper is {"}more sensitive{"} to airflow changes for smaller glottal areas. A general equation for whisper aerodynamics was obtained, namely, P (subglottal pressure [cm H(2)O])=CxF (glottal flow [cm(3)/s]), where C=0.052xA(4)-0.1913xA(3)+0.2577xA(2)-0.1523xA+0.0388, where A is the glottal area (cm(2)). Another general equation for nondimensional terms (pressure coefficient vs Reynolds number) also is offered. Implications for whisper flow resistance and aerodynamic power are given. These results give insight into whisper aerodynamics and offer equations relevant to speech synthesis.",
author = "Johan Sundberg and Ronald Scherer and Markus Hess and Frank M{\"u}ller",
year = "2010",
language = "Deutsch",
volume = "24",
pages = "574--584",
journal = "J VOICE",
issn = "0892-1997",
publisher = "Mosby Inc.",
number = "5",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Whispering-A Single-Subject Study of Glottal Configuration and Aerodynamics.

AU - Sundberg, Johan

AU - Scherer, Ronald

AU - Hess, Markus

AU - Müller, Frank

PY - 2010

Y1 - 2010

N2 - Whisper productions were produced by a single adult male subject over a wide range of subglottal pressures, glottal areas, and glottal flows. Dimensional measurements were made of these three variables, including glottal perimeter. Subglottal pressure was directly obtained by a pressure transducer in a tracheal catheter, and wide-band flow with a pneumotach mask. Four types of whispers were used-hyperfunctional, hypofunctional, neutral, and postphonation-in addition to three levels of loudness (soft, medium, loud). Sequences of the /pae/ syllable were used. Video recordings of the larynx were made. The glottis was outlined by hand with extrapolation for unseen parts, and area and perimeter were obtained through image analysis software. The whisper tokens resulted in the following wide ranges: subglottal pressure: 1.3-17cm H(2)O; glottal flow: 0.9-1.71L/s; glottal area: 0.065-1.76cm(2); and glottal perimeter: 1.09-6.55cm. Hyperfunctional whisper tended to have higher subglottal pressures and lower areas and flows than hypofunctional whisper, with neutral and postphonation whisper values in between. An important finding is that glottal flow changed more for small changes of area when the area was already small, and did not create much flow change when area was changed for already larger areas; that is, whisper is "more sensitive" to airflow changes for smaller glottal areas. A general equation for whisper aerodynamics was obtained, namely, P (subglottal pressure [cm H(2)O])=CxF (glottal flow [cm(3)/s]), where C=0.052xA(4)-0.1913xA(3)+0.2577xA(2)-0.1523xA+0.0388, where A is the glottal area (cm(2)). Another general equation for nondimensional terms (pressure coefficient vs Reynolds number) also is offered. Implications for whisper flow resistance and aerodynamic power are given. These results give insight into whisper aerodynamics and offer equations relevant to speech synthesis.

AB - Whisper productions were produced by a single adult male subject over a wide range of subglottal pressures, glottal areas, and glottal flows. Dimensional measurements were made of these three variables, including glottal perimeter. Subglottal pressure was directly obtained by a pressure transducer in a tracheal catheter, and wide-band flow with a pneumotach mask. Four types of whispers were used-hyperfunctional, hypofunctional, neutral, and postphonation-in addition to three levels of loudness (soft, medium, loud). Sequences of the /pae/ syllable were used. Video recordings of the larynx were made. The glottis was outlined by hand with extrapolation for unseen parts, and area and perimeter were obtained through image analysis software. The whisper tokens resulted in the following wide ranges: subglottal pressure: 1.3-17cm H(2)O; glottal flow: 0.9-1.71L/s; glottal area: 0.065-1.76cm(2); and glottal perimeter: 1.09-6.55cm. Hyperfunctional whisper tended to have higher subglottal pressures and lower areas and flows than hypofunctional whisper, with neutral and postphonation whisper values in between. An important finding is that glottal flow changed more for small changes of area when the area was already small, and did not create much flow change when area was changed for already larger areas; that is, whisper is "more sensitive" to airflow changes for smaller glottal areas. A general equation for whisper aerodynamics was obtained, namely, P (subglottal pressure [cm H(2)O])=CxF (glottal flow [cm(3)/s]), where C=0.052xA(4)-0.1913xA(3)+0.2577xA(2)-0.1523xA+0.0388, where A is the glottal area (cm(2)). Another general equation for nondimensional terms (pressure coefficient vs Reynolds number) also is offered. Implications for whisper flow resistance and aerodynamic power are given. These results give insight into whisper aerodynamics and offer equations relevant to speech synthesis.

M3 - SCORING: Zeitschriftenaufsatz

VL - 24

SP - 574

EP - 584

JO - J VOICE

JF - J VOICE

SN - 0892-1997

IS - 5

M1 - 5

ER -