PortalPublikationenWhich patients benefit from stentless aortic valve replaceme...

Which patients benefit from stentless aortic valve replacement?

Standard

Which patients benefit from stentless aortic valve replacement? / Gulbins, Helmut; Reichenspurner, Hermann.

in: ANN THORAC SURG, Jahrgang 88, Nr. 6, 12.2009, S. 2061-2068.

Publikationen: SCORING: Beitrag in Fachzeitschrift/Zeitung › SCORING: Review › Forschung

Harvard

Gulbins, H & Reichenspurner, H 2009, 'Which patients benefit from stentless aortic valve replacement?', ANN THORAC SURG, Jg. 88, Nr. 6, S. 2061-2068. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2009.06.060

APA

Gulbins, H., & Reichenspurner, H. (2009). Which patients benefit from stentless aortic valve replacement? ANN THORAC SURG, 88(6), 2061-2068. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2009.06.060

Vancouver

Gulbins H, Reichenspurner H. Which patients benefit from stentless aortic valve replacement? ANN THORAC SURG. 2009 Dez;88(6):2061-2068. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2009.06.060

Bibtex

@article{b188f31cd30b40f9bd9d7e9c1bd2887b,
title = "Which patients benefit from stentless aortic valve replacement?",
abstract = "This review article analyzes the literature to answer the question of whether stentless aortic bioprostheses possess proven advantages compared with stented bioprosthesis, and which patients might benefit from stentless valve implantation. For this purpose, the United States National Library of Medicine's PubMed and MEDLINE databases were searched for articles dealing with results of stentless aortic bioprostheses or studies comparing stented and stentless prostheses. Key word searches used were as follows: stentless aortic prostheses, stented aortic prosthesis, hemodynamic, hemodynamic performance, degeneration, durability, technique, and long-term follow-up. The analysis focused on stentless prostheses with a clinical experience for more than 5 years. Only a few randomized studies were found. Stentless prostheses were found to be advantageous in patients with severe impaired left ventricular function or a small aortic annulus (ie, evidence of grade II), but no specific advantages could be determined for the majority of patients. The durability results were mixed: the Toronto SPV (St. Jude Medical, Minneapolis, MN) showed an increase in degeneration after 10 years of follow-up, whereas the Freestyle porcine stentless prostheses (Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN) still showed excellent results after this period.",
keywords = "Aortic Valve/surgery, Bioprosthesis, Heart Valve Diseases/surgery, Heart Valve Prosthesis, Humans, Prosthesis Design, Treatment Outcome",
author = "Helmut Gulbins and Hermann Reichenspurner",
year = "2009",
month = dec,
doi = "10.1016/j.athoracsur.2009.06.060",
language = "English",
volume = "88",
pages = "2061--2068",
journal = "ANN THORAC SURG",
issn = "0003-4975",
publisher = "Elsevier USA",
number = "6",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Which patients benefit from stentless aortic valve replacement?

AU - Gulbins, Helmut

AU - Reichenspurner, Hermann

PY - 2009/12

Y1 - 2009/12

N2 - This review article analyzes the literature to answer the question of whether stentless aortic bioprostheses possess proven advantages compared with stented bioprosthesis, and which patients might benefit from stentless valve implantation. For this purpose, the United States National Library of Medicine's PubMed and MEDLINE databases were searched for articles dealing with results of stentless aortic bioprostheses or studies comparing stented and stentless prostheses. Key word searches used were as follows: stentless aortic prostheses, stented aortic prosthesis, hemodynamic, hemodynamic performance, degeneration, durability, technique, and long-term follow-up. The analysis focused on stentless prostheses with a clinical experience for more than 5 years. Only a few randomized studies were found. Stentless prostheses were found to be advantageous in patients with severe impaired left ventricular function or a small aortic annulus (ie, evidence of grade II), but no specific advantages could be determined for the majority of patients. The durability results were mixed: the Toronto SPV (St. Jude Medical, Minneapolis, MN) showed an increase in degeneration after 10 years of follow-up, whereas the Freestyle porcine stentless prostheses (Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN) still showed excellent results after this period.

AB - This review article analyzes the literature to answer the question of whether stentless aortic bioprostheses possess proven advantages compared with stented bioprosthesis, and which patients might benefit from stentless valve implantation. For this purpose, the United States National Library of Medicine's PubMed and MEDLINE databases were searched for articles dealing with results of stentless aortic bioprostheses or studies comparing stented and stentless prostheses. Key word searches used were as follows: stentless aortic prostheses, stented aortic prosthesis, hemodynamic, hemodynamic performance, degeneration, durability, technique, and long-term follow-up. The analysis focused on stentless prostheses with a clinical experience for more than 5 years. Only a few randomized studies were found. Stentless prostheses were found to be advantageous in patients with severe impaired left ventricular function or a small aortic annulus (ie, evidence of grade II), but no specific advantages could be determined for the majority of patients. The durability results were mixed: the Toronto SPV (St. Jude Medical, Minneapolis, MN) showed an increase in degeneration after 10 years of follow-up, whereas the Freestyle porcine stentless prostheses (Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN) still showed excellent results after this period.

KW - Aortic Valve/surgery

KW - Bioprosthesis

KW - Heart Valve Diseases/surgery

KW - Heart Valve Prosthesis

KW - Humans

KW - Prosthesis Design

KW - Treatment Outcome

U2 - 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2009.06.060

DO - 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2009.06.060

M3 - SCORING: Review article

C2 - 19932303

VL - 88

SP - 2061

EP - 2068

JO - ANN THORAC SURG

JF - ANN THORAC SURG

SN - 0003-4975

IS - 6

ER -