Verwendung und Bedeutung der "number needed to treat" in der urologischen Praxis

L A Kluth; M Rink; S F Shariat; F K Chun; M Fisch; P Dahm

doi:10.1007/s00120-013-3149-x

Verwendung und Bedeutung der "number needed to treat" in der urologischen Praxis

Standard

Verwendung und Bedeutung der "number needed to treat" in der urologischen Praxis. / Kluth, L A; Rink, M; Shariat, S F; Chun, F K; Fisch, M; Dahm, P.

in: UROLOGE, Jahrgang 52, Nr. 5, 01.05.2013, S. 682-5.

Publikationen: SCORING: Beitrag in Fachzeitschrift/Zeitung › SCORING: Zeitschriftenaufsatz › Forschung › Begutachtung

Harvard

Kluth, LA, Rink, M, Shariat, SF, Chun, FK, Fisch, M & Dahm, P 2013, 'Verwendung und Bedeutung der "number needed to treat" in der urologischen Praxis', UROLOGE, Jg. 52, Nr. 5, S. 682-5. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00120-013-3149-x

APA

Kluth, L. A., Rink, M., Shariat, S. F., Chun, F. K., Fisch, M., & Dahm, P. (2013). Verwendung und Bedeutung der "number needed to treat" in der urologischen Praxis. UROLOGE, 52(5), 682-5. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00120-013-3149-x

Vancouver

Kluth LA, Rink M, Shariat SF, Chun FK, Fisch M, Dahm P. Verwendung und Bedeutung der "number needed to treat" in der urologischen Praxis. UROLOGE. 2013 Mai 1;52(5):682-5. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00120-013-3149-x

Bibtex

@article{e6e2c1a87fba4316864304bd11749bc2,

title = "Verwendung und Bedeutung der {"}number needed to treat{"} in der urologischen Praxis",

abstract = "The number needed to treat (NNT) is a useful way for clinicans to describe the benefit or harm of a treatment as well as the costs involved. When interpreting the NNT it is essential to use the NNT in a clinically equivalent and appropriate setting. When evaluating the consequences of a treatment clinicians should make sure that the patients being treated have the same risk profile asthe study patients. Differences in duration of follow-up and baseline risks can cause significant changes in the NNT; therefore, NNT should be evaluated in addition to relative risk differences and baseline risk to reduce any ambivalence in the assessment of a treatment. This review provides insights into the assessment and clinical use of NNT in the practice.",

keywords = "Data Interpretation, Statistical, Germany, Humans, Numbers Needed To Treat, Outcome Assessment (Health Care), Prevalence, Risk Reduction Behavior, Urologic Diseases, Urology",

author = "Kluth, {L A} and M Rink and Shariat, {S F} and Chun, {F K} and M Fisch and P Dahm",

year = "2013",

month = may,

day = "1",

doi = "10.1007/s00120-013-3149-x",

language = "Deutsch",

volume = "52",

pages = "682--5",

journal = "UROLOGE",

issn = "0340-2592",

publisher = "Springer",

number = "5",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Verwendung und Bedeutung der "number needed to treat" in der urologischen Praxis

AU - Kluth, L A

AU - Rink, M

AU - Shariat, S F

AU - Chun, F K

AU - Fisch, M

AU - Dahm, P

PY - 2013/5/1

Y1 - 2013/5/1

N2 - The number needed to treat (NNT) is a useful way for clinicans to describe the benefit or harm of a treatment as well as the costs involved. When interpreting the NNT it is essential to use the NNT in a clinically equivalent and appropriate setting. When evaluating the consequences of a treatment clinicians should make sure that the patients being treated have the same risk profile asthe study patients. Differences in duration of follow-up and baseline risks can cause significant changes in the NNT; therefore, NNT should be evaluated in addition to relative risk differences and baseline risk to reduce any ambivalence in the assessment of a treatment. This review provides insights into the assessment and clinical use of NNT in the practice.

AB - The number needed to treat (NNT) is a useful way for clinicans to describe the benefit or harm of a treatment as well as the costs involved. When interpreting the NNT it is essential to use the NNT in a clinically equivalent and appropriate setting. When evaluating the consequences of a treatment clinicians should make sure that the patients being treated have the same risk profile asthe study patients. Differences in duration of follow-up and baseline risks can cause significant changes in the NNT; therefore, NNT should be evaluated in addition to relative risk differences and baseline risk to reduce any ambivalence in the assessment of a treatment. This review provides insights into the assessment and clinical use of NNT in the practice.

KW - Data Interpretation, Statistical

KW - Germany

KW - Humans

KW - Numbers Needed To Treat

KW - Outcome Assessment (Health Care)

KW - Prevalence

KW - Risk Reduction Behavior

KW - Urologic Diseases

KW - Urology

U2 - 10.1007/s00120-013-3149-x

DO - 10.1007/s00120-013-3149-x

M3 - SCORING: Zeitschriftenaufsatz

C2 - 23532201

VL - 52

SP - 682

EP - 685

JO - UROLOGE

JF - UROLOGE

SN - 0340-2592

IS - 5

ER -