Venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation after coronary artery bypass grafting: Results of a multicenter study

  • Fausto Biancari
  • Magnus Dalén
  • Andrea Perrotti
  • Antonio Fiore
  • Daniel Reichart
  • Sorosh Khodabandeh
  • Helmut Gulbins
  • Svante Zipfel
  • Mosab Al Shakaki
  • Henryk Welp
  • Antonella Vezzani
  • Tiziano Gherli
  • Jaakko Lommi
  • Tatu Juvonen
  • Peter Svenarud
  • Sidney Chocron
  • Jean Philippe Verhoye
  • Karl Bounader
  • Giuseppe Gatti
  • Marco Gabrielli
  • Matteo Saccocci
  • Eeva-Maija Kinnunen
  • Francesco Onorati
  • Giuseppe Santarpino
  • Khalid Alkhamees
  • Vito G Ruggieri
  • Angelo M Dell'Aquila

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The evidence of the benefits of using venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) is scarce.

METHODS: We analyzed the outcomes of patients who received VA-ECMO therapy due to cardiac or respiratory failure after isolated CABG in 12 centers between 2005 and 2016. Patients treated preoperatively with ECMO were excluded from this study.

RESULTS: VA-ECMO was employed in 148 patients after CABG for median of 5.0days (mean, 6.4, SD 5.6days). In-hospital mortality was 64.2%. Pooled in-hospital mortality was 65.9% without significant heterogeneity between the centers (I2 8.6%). The proportion of VA-ECMO in each center did not affect in-hospital mortality (p=0.861). No patients underwent heart transplantation and six patients received a left ventricular assist device. Logistic regression showed that creatinine clearance (p=0.004, OR 0.98, 95% CI 0.97-0.99), pulmonary disease (p=0.018, OR 4.42, 95% CI 1.29-15.15) and pre-VA-ECMO blood lactate (p=0.015, OR 1.10, 95% CI 1.02-1.18) were independent baseline predictors of in-hospital mortality. One-, 2-, and 3-year survival was 31.0%, 27.9%, and 26.1%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS: One third of patients with need for VA-ECMO after CABG survive to discharge. In view of the burden of resources associated with VA-ECMO treatment and the limited number of patients surviving to discharge, further studies are needed to identify patients who may benefit the most from this treatment.

Bibliografische Daten

OriginalspracheEnglisch
ISSN0167-5273
DOIs
StatusVeröffentlicht - 15.08.2017

Anmerkungen des Dekanats

Copyright © 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

PubMed 28389122