Valve-in-valve transcatheter aortic valve implantation for degenerated bioprosthetic heart valves

Standard

Valve-in-valve transcatheter aortic valve implantation for degenerated bioprosthetic heart valves. / Eggebrecht, Holger; Schäfer, Ulrich; Treede, Hendrik; Boekstegers, Peter; Babin-Ebell, Jörg; Ferrari, Markus; Möllmann, Helge; Baumgartner, Helmut; Carrel, Thierry; Kahlert, Philipp; Lange, Philipp; Walther, Thomas; Erbel, Raimund; Mehta, Rajendra H; Thielmann, Matthias.

in: JACC-CARDIOVASC INTE, Jahrgang 4, Nr. 11, 11.2011, S. 1218-1227.

Publikationen: SCORING: Beitrag in Fachzeitschrift/ZeitungSCORING: ZeitschriftenaufsatzForschungBegutachtung

Harvard

Eggebrecht, H, Schäfer, U, Treede, H, Boekstegers, P, Babin-Ebell, J, Ferrari, M, Möllmann, H, Baumgartner, H, Carrel, T, Kahlert, P, Lange, P, Walther, T, Erbel, R, Mehta, RH & Thielmann, M 2011, 'Valve-in-valve transcatheter aortic valve implantation for degenerated bioprosthetic heart valves', JACC-CARDIOVASC INTE, Jg. 4, Nr. 11, S. 1218-1227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcin.2011.07.015

APA

Eggebrecht, H., Schäfer, U., Treede, H., Boekstegers, P., Babin-Ebell, J., Ferrari, M., Möllmann, H., Baumgartner, H., Carrel, T., Kahlert, P., Lange, P., Walther, T., Erbel, R., Mehta, R. H., & Thielmann, M. (2011). Valve-in-valve transcatheter aortic valve implantation for degenerated bioprosthetic heart valves. JACC-CARDIOVASC INTE, 4(11), 1218-1227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcin.2011.07.015

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{ab94ecf4ce5347f4baf5c474e0db3bd6,
title = "Valve-in-valve transcatheter aortic valve implantation for degenerated bioprosthetic heart valves",
abstract = "OBJECTIVES: We sought to analyze outcomes of patients with degenerated surgically implanted bioprosthetic heart valves undergoing valve-in-valve (viv) transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI).BACKGROUND: Redo cardiac surgery for degenerated bioprosthetic heart valves is associated with increased risks, particular in elderly patients with comorbidities. For these patients, TAVI may be an attractive, less invasive treatment option.METHODS: Data from 47 patients age 64 to 97 years (logistic euroSCORE: 35.0 ± 18.5%) undergoing transfemoral (n = 25) or transapical (n = 22) viv-TAVI for failed bioprosthetic aortic valves 113 ± 65 months after initial surgery at 9 clinical sites in Germany and Switzerland were analyzed.RESULTS: Valve-in-valve TAVI was technically successful in all patients, with 2 patients requiring bailout implantation of a second TAVI prosthesis for severe regurgitation during the procedure. There was 1 procedural death as the result of low-output failure. Valvular function after viv-TAVI was excellent with respect to valve competence, but increased transvalvular gradients ≥20 mm Hg were noted in 44% of patients. Vascular access complications occurred in 6 (13%) patients, and 5 (11%) patients required new pacemaker implantation after viv-TAVI. Renal failure requiring dialysis occurred in 4 (9%) patients. Mortality at 30 days was 17% (1 procedural and 7 post-procedural deaths), with 3 of 8 fatalities the result of non-valve-related septic complications.CONCLUSIONS: Valve-in-valve TAVI can be performed with high technical success rates, acceptable post-procedural valvular function, and excellent functional improvement. However, in these predominantly elderly high-risk patients with multiple comorbidities, viv-TAVI was associated with 17% mortality, often because of septic complications arising in the post-operative phase.",
keywords = "Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Analysis of Variance, Aortic Valve/physiopathology, Bioprosthesis, Cardiac Catheterization/adverse effects, Female, Germany, Heart Valve Diseases/mortality, Heart Valve Prosthesis, Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation/adverse effects, Humans, Kaplan-Meier Estimate, Male, Middle Aged, Prosthesis Design, Prosthesis Failure, Registries, Retrospective Studies, Risk Assessment, Risk Factors, Switzerland, Treatment Outcome",
author = "Holger Eggebrecht and Ulrich Sch{\"a}fer and Hendrik Treede and Peter Boekstegers and J{\"o}rg Babin-Ebell and Markus Ferrari and Helge M{\"o}llmann and Helmut Baumgartner and Thierry Carrel and Philipp Kahlert and Philipp Lange and Thomas Walther and Raimund Erbel and Mehta, {Rajendra H} and Matthias Thielmann",
note = "Copyright {\textcopyright} 2011 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.",
year = "2011",
month = nov,
doi = "10.1016/j.jcin.2011.07.015",
language = "English",
volume = "4",
pages = "1218--1227",
journal = "JACC-CARDIOVASC INTE",
issn = "1936-8798",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "11",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Valve-in-valve transcatheter aortic valve implantation for degenerated bioprosthetic heart valves

AU - Eggebrecht, Holger

AU - Schäfer, Ulrich

AU - Treede, Hendrik

AU - Boekstegers, Peter

AU - Babin-Ebell, Jörg

AU - Ferrari, Markus

AU - Möllmann, Helge

AU - Baumgartner, Helmut

AU - Carrel, Thierry

AU - Kahlert, Philipp

AU - Lange, Philipp

AU - Walther, Thomas

AU - Erbel, Raimund

AU - Mehta, Rajendra H

AU - Thielmann, Matthias

N1 - Copyright © 2011 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

PY - 2011/11

Y1 - 2011/11

N2 - OBJECTIVES: We sought to analyze outcomes of patients with degenerated surgically implanted bioprosthetic heart valves undergoing valve-in-valve (viv) transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI).BACKGROUND: Redo cardiac surgery for degenerated bioprosthetic heart valves is associated with increased risks, particular in elderly patients with comorbidities. For these patients, TAVI may be an attractive, less invasive treatment option.METHODS: Data from 47 patients age 64 to 97 years (logistic euroSCORE: 35.0 ± 18.5%) undergoing transfemoral (n = 25) or transapical (n = 22) viv-TAVI for failed bioprosthetic aortic valves 113 ± 65 months after initial surgery at 9 clinical sites in Germany and Switzerland were analyzed.RESULTS: Valve-in-valve TAVI was technically successful in all patients, with 2 patients requiring bailout implantation of a second TAVI prosthesis for severe regurgitation during the procedure. There was 1 procedural death as the result of low-output failure. Valvular function after viv-TAVI was excellent with respect to valve competence, but increased transvalvular gradients ≥20 mm Hg were noted in 44% of patients. Vascular access complications occurred in 6 (13%) patients, and 5 (11%) patients required new pacemaker implantation after viv-TAVI. Renal failure requiring dialysis occurred in 4 (9%) patients. Mortality at 30 days was 17% (1 procedural and 7 post-procedural deaths), with 3 of 8 fatalities the result of non-valve-related septic complications.CONCLUSIONS: Valve-in-valve TAVI can be performed with high technical success rates, acceptable post-procedural valvular function, and excellent functional improvement. However, in these predominantly elderly high-risk patients with multiple comorbidities, viv-TAVI was associated with 17% mortality, often because of septic complications arising in the post-operative phase.

AB - OBJECTIVES: We sought to analyze outcomes of patients with degenerated surgically implanted bioprosthetic heart valves undergoing valve-in-valve (viv) transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI).BACKGROUND: Redo cardiac surgery for degenerated bioprosthetic heart valves is associated with increased risks, particular in elderly patients with comorbidities. For these patients, TAVI may be an attractive, less invasive treatment option.METHODS: Data from 47 patients age 64 to 97 years (logistic euroSCORE: 35.0 ± 18.5%) undergoing transfemoral (n = 25) or transapical (n = 22) viv-TAVI for failed bioprosthetic aortic valves 113 ± 65 months after initial surgery at 9 clinical sites in Germany and Switzerland were analyzed.RESULTS: Valve-in-valve TAVI was technically successful in all patients, with 2 patients requiring bailout implantation of a second TAVI prosthesis for severe regurgitation during the procedure. There was 1 procedural death as the result of low-output failure. Valvular function after viv-TAVI was excellent with respect to valve competence, but increased transvalvular gradients ≥20 mm Hg were noted in 44% of patients. Vascular access complications occurred in 6 (13%) patients, and 5 (11%) patients required new pacemaker implantation after viv-TAVI. Renal failure requiring dialysis occurred in 4 (9%) patients. Mortality at 30 days was 17% (1 procedural and 7 post-procedural deaths), with 3 of 8 fatalities the result of non-valve-related septic complications.CONCLUSIONS: Valve-in-valve TAVI can be performed with high technical success rates, acceptable post-procedural valvular function, and excellent functional improvement. However, in these predominantly elderly high-risk patients with multiple comorbidities, viv-TAVI was associated with 17% mortality, often because of septic complications arising in the post-operative phase.

KW - Aged

KW - Aged, 80 and over

KW - Analysis of Variance

KW - Aortic Valve/physiopathology

KW - Bioprosthesis

KW - Cardiac Catheterization/adverse effects

KW - Female

KW - Germany

KW - Heart Valve Diseases/mortality

KW - Heart Valve Prosthesis

KW - Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation/adverse effects

KW - Humans

KW - Kaplan-Meier Estimate

KW - Male

KW - Middle Aged

KW - Prosthesis Design

KW - Prosthesis Failure

KW - Registries

KW - Retrospective Studies

KW - Risk Assessment

KW - Risk Factors

KW - Switzerland

KW - Treatment Outcome

U2 - 10.1016/j.jcin.2011.07.015

DO - 10.1016/j.jcin.2011.07.015

M3 - SCORING: Journal article

C2 - 22115663

VL - 4

SP - 1218

EP - 1227

JO - JACC-CARDIOVASC INTE

JF - JACC-CARDIOVASC INTE

SN - 1936-8798

IS - 11

ER -