Usability and usefulness of (electronic) patient identification systems---A cross-sectional evaluation in German-speaking radiation oncology departments

Standard

Usability and usefulness of (electronic) patient identification systems---A cross-sectional evaluation in German-speaking radiation oncology departments. / Baehr, Andrea; Grohmann, Maximilian; Guberina, Maja; Schulze, Katrin; Lange, Tim; Nestle, Ursula; Ernst, Philipp; DEGRO Working Group for Patient Safety.

in: STRAHLENTHER ONKOL, Jahrgang 200, Nr. 6, 06.2024, S. 468-474.

Publikationen: SCORING: Beitrag in Fachzeitschrift/ZeitungSCORING: ZeitschriftenaufsatzForschungBegutachtung

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{5a64ff1139d743d5b87d1876d64b9d25,
title = "Usability and usefulness of (electronic) patient identification systems---A cross-sectional evaluation in German-speaking radiation oncology departments",
abstract = "PURPOSE: Patient misidentification in radiation oncology (RO) is a significant concern due to the potential harm to patient health and the burden on healthcare systems. Electronic patient identification systems (ePIS) are increasingly being used as an alternative or supplement to organizational systems (oPIS). The objective of this study was to assess the usability and usefulness of ePIS and oPIS in German-speaking countries.METHODS: A cross-sectional survey was designed by a group of experts from various professional backgrounds in RO. The survey consisted of 38 questions encompassing quantitative and qualitative data on usability, user experience, and usefulness of PIS. It was available between August and October 2022.RESULTS: Of 118 eligible participants, 37% had implemented some kind of ePIS. Overall, 22% of participants who use an oPIS vs. 10% of participants who use an ePIS reported adverse events in terms of patients' misidentification in the past 5 years. Frequent or very frequent drop-outs of electronic systems were reported by 31% of ePIS users. Users of ePIS significantly more often affirmed a positive cost-benefit ratio of ePIS as well as an improvement of workflow, whereas users of oPIS more frequently apprehended a decrease in staffs' attention through ePIS. The response rate was 8%.CONCLUSION: The implementation of ePIS can contribute to efficient PI and improved processes. Apprehensions by oPIS users and assessments of ePIS users differ significantly in aspects of the perceived usefulness of ePIS. However, technical problems need to be addressed to ensure the reliability of ePIS. Further research is needed to assess the impact of different PIS on patient safety in RO.",
author = "Andrea Baehr and Maximilian Grohmann and Maja Guberina and Katrin Schulze and Tim Lange and Ursula Nestle and Philipp Ernst and {DEGRO Working Group for Patient Safety}",
year = "2024",
month = jun,
doi = "10.1007/s00066-023-02148-9",
language = "English",
volume = "200",
pages = "468--474",
journal = "STRAHLENTHER ONKOL",
issn = "0179-7158",
publisher = "Urban und Vogel",
number = "6",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Usability and usefulness of (electronic) patient identification systems---A cross-sectional evaluation in German-speaking radiation oncology departments

AU - Baehr, Andrea

AU - Grohmann, Maximilian

AU - Guberina, Maja

AU - Schulze, Katrin

AU - Lange, Tim

AU - Nestle, Ursula

AU - Ernst, Philipp

AU - DEGRO Working Group for Patient Safety

PY - 2024/6

Y1 - 2024/6

N2 - PURPOSE: Patient misidentification in radiation oncology (RO) is a significant concern due to the potential harm to patient health and the burden on healthcare systems. Electronic patient identification systems (ePIS) are increasingly being used as an alternative or supplement to organizational systems (oPIS). The objective of this study was to assess the usability and usefulness of ePIS and oPIS in German-speaking countries.METHODS: A cross-sectional survey was designed by a group of experts from various professional backgrounds in RO. The survey consisted of 38 questions encompassing quantitative and qualitative data on usability, user experience, and usefulness of PIS. It was available between August and October 2022.RESULTS: Of 118 eligible participants, 37% had implemented some kind of ePIS. Overall, 22% of participants who use an oPIS vs. 10% of participants who use an ePIS reported adverse events in terms of patients' misidentification in the past 5 years. Frequent or very frequent drop-outs of electronic systems were reported by 31% of ePIS users. Users of ePIS significantly more often affirmed a positive cost-benefit ratio of ePIS as well as an improvement of workflow, whereas users of oPIS more frequently apprehended a decrease in staffs' attention through ePIS. The response rate was 8%.CONCLUSION: The implementation of ePIS can contribute to efficient PI and improved processes. Apprehensions by oPIS users and assessments of ePIS users differ significantly in aspects of the perceived usefulness of ePIS. However, technical problems need to be addressed to ensure the reliability of ePIS. Further research is needed to assess the impact of different PIS on patient safety in RO.

AB - PURPOSE: Patient misidentification in radiation oncology (RO) is a significant concern due to the potential harm to patient health and the burden on healthcare systems. Electronic patient identification systems (ePIS) are increasingly being used as an alternative or supplement to organizational systems (oPIS). The objective of this study was to assess the usability and usefulness of ePIS and oPIS in German-speaking countries.METHODS: A cross-sectional survey was designed by a group of experts from various professional backgrounds in RO. The survey consisted of 38 questions encompassing quantitative and qualitative data on usability, user experience, and usefulness of PIS. It was available between August and October 2022.RESULTS: Of 118 eligible participants, 37% had implemented some kind of ePIS. Overall, 22% of participants who use an oPIS vs. 10% of participants who use an ePIS reported adverse events in terms of patients' misidentification in the past 5 years. Frequent or very frequent drop-outs of electronic systems were reported by 31% of ePIS users. Users of ePIS significantly more often affirmed a positive cost-benefit ratio of ePIS as well as an improvement of workflow, whereas users of oPIS more frequently apprehended a decrease in staffs' attention through ePIS. The response rate was 8%.CONCLUSION: The implementation of ePIS can contribute to efficient PI and improved processes. Apprehensions by oPIS users and assessments of ePIS users differ significantly in aspects of the perceived usefulness of ePIS. However, technical problems need to be addressed to ensure the reliability of ePIS. Further research is needed to assess the impact of different PIS on patient safety in RO.

U2 - 10.1007/s00066-023-02148-9

DO - 10.1007/s00066-023-02148-9

M3 - SCORING: Journal article

C2 - 37713170

VL - 200

SP - 468

EP - 474

JO - STRAHLENTHER ONKOL

JF - STRAHLENTHER ONKOL

SN - 0179-7158

IS - 6

ER -